Megaphyllum tauricum (Attems, 1907)

Lazányi, Eszter & Vagalinski, Boyan, 2013, Redefinition of the millipede subgenus Megaphyllum sensu stricto Verhoeff, 1894 and neotype designation for Megaphyllum austriacum (Latzel, 1884) (Myriapoda: Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae), Zootaxa 3741 (1), pp. 55-100 : 88-89

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3741.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF5EA9B8-C6F4-448A-BEF9-1976AB4EC308

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6151746

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887D3-FFD8-FF95-FF34-99B1FE27AC51

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Megaphyllum tauricum (Attems, 1907)
status

 

Megaphyllum tauricum (Attems, 1907) View in CoL

Figs 19a–f View FIGURES 19 a – f

Brachyiulus tauricus Attems, 1907: 13 –14, Figs 11–14 View FIGURES 11 a – g View FIGURES 12 a – g View FIGURES 13 a – f View FIGURES 14 a – g .

Chromatoiulus tauricus: Attems 1927: 223 , 236, Figs 318–320. Chromatoiulus (Chromatoiulus) tauricus: Attems 1940: 306 . Megaphyllum tauricum: Golovatch 1990: 362 .

Material examined. Ukraine: Inv. No. 3134, 1♂, 3♀, Syntypen, Krim, Alupka, leg. Stuxberg 1897, don. Jägerskiöd, Museum Göteborg (NHMW); ZMB 8652, 1♂, Krim [det. Verhoeff?] (MNB).

Distribution. Ukraine: Krimean Peninsula: Alupka, Jalta [Yalta], Gursuff (today: Gurzuf), “Dschatyr Dagh” [Mt. Chatyr-Dagh] (type localities).

Diagnosis. Differs from the most similar species M. rhodopinum by the wider, apically more rounded posterior opisthomere process (pp) ( Figs 19a–b, 19d View FIGURES 19 a – f ), and by the somewhat more tapering promere with a longitudinal indentation (i) ( Figs 19a, 19c View FIGURES 19 a – f ).

Promeres (P) ( Figs 19a–c View FIGURES 19 a – f ) posterolaterally with a significant longitudinal indentation (i); lateral margins of each promere parallel to each other. Opisthomere’s ( Figs 19a–b, 19d View FIGURES 19 a – f ) posterior process (pp) as long as solenomere. Anterior solenomere process (asp) much longer than posterior process (psp). Both sexes seem to be uniformly brown like M. rhodopinum . Body length and height: males: 28.6–30.9mm, 2.2mm. Females were not measured in the present study, but their height according to Attems (1907): 3.5mm.

Remarks. Attems (1927) mistook M. sjaelandicum for M. tauricum , the latter described by him in 1907. This misidentification was commented on by Lohmander (1936) who noticed differences between the original description of M. tauricum and its later treatment in Attems’ (1927) paper. We investigated both Attems’ type material and the material published in 1927, supplemented with material from MNB, probably identified by Verhoeff, judging by the handwriting on the labels. M. tauricum is a valid species, and in fact, the sample cited by Attems (1927) consists of M. sjaelandicum individuals.

Female vulva unknown.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Diplopoda

Order

Julida

Family

Julidae

Genus

Megaphyllum

SubGenus

Megaphyllum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Diplopoda

Order

Julida

Family

Julidae

Genus

Brachyiulus

SubGenus

Megaphyllum

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF