Eustigmaeus formosus, Mierski, Andrzej Ka Ż & Czyk, Justyna Do Ñ, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157100 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277052 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887B5-FFF6-FF89-5432-FBDBFC25FDB2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eustigmaeus formosus |
status |
sp. nov. |
1. Eustigmaeus formosus sp. n. ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 1 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURES 5 7 )
Locus typicus. North Poland. Tczew province. “Opalenie Górne” Reserve, near Mala Karczma village. Oakhornbeam forest (Notation: “JUDO 9 A...G”).
The research place has been traced in TilioCarpinetum forest, fragment with Tilia cordata, Quercus robur, Acer platanoides and Carpinus betulus . In wealthy and heterogeneous fleece the most important were: Aegopodium podagraria, Galeobdolon luteum, Hepatica nobilis, Majanthemum bifolium and Mercurialis perennis . Besides, there are plant species which are quite rare in regional scale, or species which are lawfully protected: Platanthera bifolia, Asarum europaeum, Asperula odorata and Equistemum pratense .
Sampled material: plants fragments, litter, soil, moss from fallen logs as well as from bark of trees.
Specimens. Holotype: female, slide N o 9A / P1 (coll. date: 31 Jun. 1999). Paratypes: female, 9E / P1 and female, 9E / P5 (coll. date 0 5 Mar. 2000).
Type repository. Holotype is kept in ZMH. Both paratypes are deposited in DAM.
Etymology. The Latin word “ formosus ” means “shapely”, “beautiful”.
General character. The species of “ pinnatus ” group ( Kaźmierski 2000): sabreshaped dorsal setae, three pairs of aggenital setae (ag), genu II with four setae, including thornshaped famulus k.
Description of holotype, female (slide N o 9A / P1).
Idiosoma. Relatively large (in comparison with other Eustigmaeus species), broadly oval ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 3 ). Length: 425, width: 321. Ratio of length to width (from measurements of all the specimens) = proportion index: 1.32 1. 37. Shields: P, HY (embraced also the ventral side) and SA. Cuticle broad, strongly sclerotized. Ornamentation: composed of multiangular “meshes” equal in largeness, with irregulary outlined “craters” inside of all the polygons. The bottoms of “craters” dotted by alveolae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 7 ). All the idiosoma is covered with ornament ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 3 ), together with ventral side and coxisternal regions ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ), thus, only trochanteres and the remaining leg segments are deprived of polygons. Eyes rounded ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 3 ), moreless as large as single polygon, situated between setae be and ce. Caudal setae (li = d, e, le) straight or at least only slightly bended, sharp, strongly serrated ( Figs.1, 3 View FIGURES 1 3 ), shorter and broader than the remaining dorsal setae. The latter are sabreshaped ( Figs.1, 2 View FIGURES 1 3 ), sharp on the ends and rough only (without serration). Length of setae: ae 88, be 107, ce 80, de 85, he 72, a 71, b 95, c 95, la 76, li 68, lm 79, e 39, le 31. Ventral side ornamented. Lack of sternal shields (SP and SM). Ventral chaetotaxy: 3 (1a, 3a, 4a). Genital chaetotaxy: (3 3). Setae ge situated on smooth genital plates. Setae ag set on the ornamented cuticle (ag3 on the lips) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 7 ).
Gnathosoma . Basal part hidden under the anterior projection of aspidosoma ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). The length of subtly bent cheliceral stylets: 40. Palps ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 7 ): tibial claw strong, thick, terminally rounded (blunt), with downed tip, additionally with short and stout thorn on its base. Palpal tarsus (= “thumb”) rather slender, approximately as long as claw, ended by trident trifurcate eupathidium (p). Besides, five different in length and shape setae, as well as small, proximal solenidium occur. A complete palpal chaetotaxy is: [0 3 4+claw with thorn 5+(p)+]. The shape and localization of setae as in Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 7 .
Legs. Relatively short. Chaetotaxy: I (2 1 6 3+ k 5+ p + ’’ 13+), II (2 1 3+1 3+ k 6 9+), III (2 2 3 1 6 7+), IV (2 1 2 1 6 6+). Apotele with two claws and empodium. Empodiae composed of main stem and three bifurcate chetoids (=rylets), divided on very base. They look like three pairs of hairs, the tips of which are forked additionally on their very ends. Detailed organotaxy of leg I ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5 7 ) from trochanter to tarsus (symbols of trochanteral and femoral setae are newly proposed): trochanter trv (nude); femur bfl’’ (slightly serrated), tfv (nude), tfl’ (nude), tfl’’ (slightly serrated), tfd’, tfd’’ (both strongly serrated); genu l’, l’’, d (all strongly serrated), famulus k (in form of thick thorn); tibia v’, v’’ (both nude), l’, l’’ (both strongly serrated), d (strongly serrate), solenidiae p and ’’.The latter one is distinctly longer and more developed than the basal solenidium p.Tarsus three pairs of eupathidials: (ft), (tc) and (p), three pairs of normal setae: (pl), (at), (u), single seta vs and long solenidium I. Symbol at for anterials is used instead of Grandjean’s designation a for avoid a homonym (Setae (a) are dorsal setae). All tarsal setae nude. One of four setae on femur II is much shorter, in form of narrow thorn.
Differentiating diagnosis. The new species is similar in total view to Eustigmaeus pinnatus ( Kuznetzov, 1977) . The main differences between both closely related species are as follow:
Dimensions. The new species is larger: holotype: length 425 / width 321, paratypes females: 440 / 321 (Holotype of E. pinnatus : 330 / 265).
Proportions. The new species is narrower: ratio of length to width: 1,32 1,37 (Holotype of E. pinnatus : 1,24).
The shape of setae. The new species has two categories of dorsal setae: broadly lanceolate, shorter and strongly serrate caudal setae (li, e, le) and sabreshaped, longer and narrower, unserrated the remaining ones (All the dorsal setae of E. pinnatus are about equally shaped, in form of broad sabres with serration).
Genital chaetotaxy. The new species: (3 3), E. pinnatus : (4 3). However, some of specimens of E. pinnatus from Poland have three pairs of ge setae in oposition to Kuznetzov’s description ( Kuznetzov 1977) (Individual variability?).
ZMH |
Zoologisches Museum Hamburg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |