Hypoxys triangularis (Dallas, 1851) Nunes et al., 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:121EA9DC-F17B-46FD-8987-F879BC6DAA99 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6911511 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787C3-FFDC-FFF3-C2AB-FC14FA57FDB3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hypoxys triangularis |
status |
|
Hypoxys triangularis Group
( Figs. 1–12 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 )
Diagnosis. Body uniformly green with corium reddish-brown ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) (green with yellow spots in H. triangularis — see Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 19E–F), and a median large yellow spot on the ventral surface. Species of the H. triangularis group also lack any transversal black stripe on pronotum and ventral surface, like in the other species groups of Hypoxys , except H. triangularis (see Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 19E). Trichobothria with base yellowish ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ). Male genitalia. Paramere (Pa) usually ax-shaped ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ). Inner wall of pygophore laterally swollen ( Figs. 3B–C View FIGURE 3 , 8 View FIGURE 8 —black arrow). Ventral rim (Vr) with expansions slightly developed and rounded ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Female genitalia ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Valvifers VIII (Vf8) with mediolateral crest swollen (black arrow); outer lateral angle of the posterior margin (red arrow) rounded or ending in an acute projection.
Redescription. Head. Mandibular plates without spot ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Antennae yellow with setae more densely distributed on antennomeres III, IV and V.
Thorax.Anterolateral margin of pronotum usually not punctured, except H. subrastratus (see Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 19I) and H. saltensis sp. n. ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ). Apex of humeral angle with margin brown ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Pronotum and scutellum usually with brown punctures ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Anterior margin of scutellum without yellow stripe, like the one found in some species of H. quadridens and H. oxyacanthus groups. Costal margin of corium with a black spot reaching approximately 1/3 of corial extension ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 ). Propleura with concolorous punctures concentrated on posterior half. Evaporatorium slightly whitish ( Figs. 10F View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ). Metasternal process with arms of anterior bifurcation receiving fourth and most of third rostral segment ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ).
Abdomen. Dorsal surface with brown spots. Connexivum with two barely excavated areas ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ) and usually not associated with dark spot (except H. triangularis ). Pseudosutures with or without adjacent dark green spot ( Figs. 10B View FIGURE 10 , 11D View FIGURE 11 ).
Male. Pygophore dorsally with brown to reddish brown spot occupying about 1/2 of the length of the pygophore; distal part of dorsal surface coarse ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ). Superior process (Pc) of genital cup brown and positioned near to dorsal rim ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Paramere directed posterolaterally ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ); base with a swollen and rounded protuberance ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 , blue arrow). Proctiger (Proc) with posterior face triangular, elliptical or pentagonal, and bent ventrally ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
Female. Valvifers VIII and Valvifers IX (Vf9) convex ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ). Laterotergites VIII (La8) with margin black ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Laterotergites IX (La9) with outer lateral margin sinuous, well projected beyond sclerite uniting laterotergites VIII; almost reaching level of laterotergites VIII ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ). Capsula seminalis (Cs) with two thick projections of equal lengths ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); projections of capsula seminalis of the same width as pars intermedialis (Pi) ( Fig. 6F View FIGURE 6 ).
Comments. Five new species are described into H. triangularis group. Therefore, the new composition of the group is: Hypoxys triangularis ; H. capito ; H. subrastratus ; H. myrtacivorus sp. n.; H. saltensis sp. n.; H. striatus sp. n.; H. curvatus sp. n. and H. ocanensis sp. n. The H. triangularis group has species associated with cultivated plants of the family Myrtaceae Juss. (Angiosperma; Myrtales ): H. triangularis associated the Eugenia uniflora L. (brazilian-cherry) and Psidium guajava (guava) ( Lima et al. 2010); H. subrastratus associated the Eugenia uniflora (brazilian-cherry) (data base Inaturalist; Fernandes pers. Comm.); H. myrtacivorus sp. n. associated the Myrciaria dubia (Kunth) McVaugh (camu-camu) ( Panduro et al. 2001), Eugenia malaccensis L. (red jambo) and Eugenia uniflora L. (see comments of H. myrtacivorus sp. n.). Parameres of this species group are also almost straight in dorsal view and never strongly curved laterally, characteristic shared with Hypoxys balteatus group (see in Mendonça et al. 2021). The internal genitalia of some Edessinae genera were described, but never compared or discussed in a comprehensive way ( Pantochlora vivida Stål, 1870 , ilustrated— Kumar (1969); Brachystethus Laporte, 1832 — Grazia & Barcellos (2003); Paraedessa Silva & Fernandes, 2013 — Silva et al. (2013); Ascra Say, 1832 — Santos et al. (2015); Plagaedessa Almeida & Fernandes, 2018 — Almeida et al. (2018); Pygoda Amyot & Serville, 1843 — Fernandes et al. (2018); Graziaedessa anastrephae Eger, 2021 , only the phallus described— Eger (2021); Edessa ovina group— Fernandes & Silva (2021)). The internal genitalia of species of Hypoxys have not been describe yet. This is the first attempt to compare and use internal genitalia to characterize the groups of species. Studying the internal genitalia of species belonging to the Hypoxys , we observed some characteristics that support Hypoxys and its groups of species. The female internal genitalia present the following characteristics for Hypoxys : distal part of vesicular area of the ductus receptaculi sclerotized ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 , yellow arrow); base of the capsula seminalis spherical and sclerotized ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 , green arrow); capsula seminalis dilated with thick projections well-developed ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ); posterior annular crest more developed than anterior annular crest ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). The phallus of Hypoxys species have the phallotheca cylindrical and curved dorsoventrally ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). The differences observed between the species belonging to different groups of Hypoxys were: the H. quadridens ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) and H. oxyacanthus ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) groups share the projections of capsula seminalis wider and more dilated than the pars intermedialis. In H. triangularis ( Fig. 6D, E, F View FIGURE 6 ) and H. balteatus ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ) groups the projections of capsula seminalis are almost as wide as pars intermedialis. Groups H. quadridens and H. oxyacanthus share median portion of pars intermedialis thickened and spherical, while in H. triangularis group this structure is spherical or cylindrical, and in H. balteatus group the same structure is cylindrical. The H. quadridens group shows the base of capsula seminalis conical ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 , red arrow). Hypoxys oxyacanthus group has the globose base of capsula seminalis as wide as the segment X. A comparative study of the internal genitalia in all taxa of Edessinae can help to understand the evolution of the genitalia in the subfamily and add diagnostic characteristics to the genera.
Distribution ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). BRAZIL; FRENCH GUIANA; VENEZUELA; PARAGUAY; SURINAME; GUIANA; BOLIVIA; PERU; COLOMBIA, and ARGENTINA.
Key to species of the Hypoxys triangularis group
1. Pronotum with posterior smoky brown stripe; ventral surface of the body with small yellow calli (See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 19E–F).................................................................................. H. triangularis
1’. Pronotum without dark stripe; ventral surface of the body without yellow calli ( Figs. 10A View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 )...................... 2
2. Male............................................................................................... 3
2’. Female..............................................................................................8
3. Proctiger strongly ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 11A–B View FIGURE 11 ) or moderately excavated laterally ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ).........4
3’. Proctiger shallowly excavated laterally ( Figs. 2D View FIGURE 2 , 8B View FIGURE 8 )........................................................ 7
4. Dorsal rim of pygophore medially notched (See Nunes et al. 2020 – Fig. 11A View FIGURE 11 ). Superior process of genital cup subtriangular, almost the same size on swollen area on inner wall of pygophore ( Fig. 8C View FIGURE 8 )............................ H. subrastratus
4’. Dorsal rim entire. Superior process of genital cup elliptic, bigger than swollen area on inner wall of pygophore ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4B View FIGURE 4 )................................................................................................ 5
5. Superior process of genital cup coarse in posterior view ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Paramere spearhead-shaped ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ).. H. saltensis sp. n.
5’. Superior process of genital cup smooth in posterior view ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Paramere ax-shaped ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 4D View FIGURE 4 )............. 6
6. Swollen area on inner wall globose, developed, close to posterolateral angles ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ). Ventral rim with bottom of excavation convex ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 )..................................................................... H. myrtacivorus sp. n.
6”. Swollen area on inner wall narrow, slightly developed, contiguous to posterolateral angles ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ). Ventral rim with bottom of excavation flat ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 )............................................................... H. curvatus sp. n.
7. Superior process of genital cup subtriangular, small, swollen in posterior view ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Expansions of ventral rim hardly visible ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ).......................................................................... H. striatus sp. n.
7’. Superior process of genital cup elliptic, narrow, smooth in posterior view ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ). Expansions of ventral rim visible (See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 )...................................................................... H. capito
8. Valvifers VIII with outer lateral angle rounded ( Figs. 2E View FIGURE 2 , See Nunes et al. 2020: Figs. 10D View FIGURE 10 , 11D View FIGURE 11 )..................... 9
8’. Valvifers VIII with outer lateral angle acute ( Figs. 1E View FIGURE 1 , 4E View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 )................................................ 11
9. Valvifers VIII with excavation in “V” (See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ).................................. ... H. capito
9’. Valvifers VIII with excavation in “U” ( Figs. 2E View FIGURE 2 , See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 )................................. 10
10. Valvifers VIII with mediolateral crest slightly swollen ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ); median excavation narrow, clearly narrower than base of valvifers IX ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ).................................................................... H. striatus sp. n.
10’. Valvifers VIII with mediolateral crest swollen ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ); median excavation wide, almost as wide as base of valvifers IX (See Nunes et al. 2020: Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 )................................................................ H. subrastratus
11. Mediolateral crest of valvifers VIII carinated ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 )......................................... H. ocanensis sp. n.
11’. Mediolateral crest of valvifers VIII not carinated ( Fig. 8D, 8E View FIGURE 8 )................................................ 12
12. Valvifers VIII with mesial borders forming a spiniform median projection ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 )............... H. myrtacivorus sp. n.
12’. Valvifers VIII with mesial borders not forming a spiniform projection. ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 )..................... H. curvatus sp. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |