Phialodonta perfida ( Burnup, 1912 ) Herbert, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.629 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ECEBD539-6E3E-45BE-A0CB-264DF3270CC0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3804746 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C78785-4621-FFF2-41D6-422A3361FD4A |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Phialodonta perfida ( Burnup, 1912 ) |
status |
gen. et comb. nov. |
Phialodonta perfida ( Burnup, 1912) View in CoL gen. et comb. nov.
Figs 14 View Fig , 16 View Fig E–H, 19I–J
Trachycystis rotula Melvill & Ponsonby, 1907: 99 , pl. 6, figs 12, 12a.
Endodonta View in CoL [ Endodonta (Afrodonta) ] perfida Burnup, 1912: 337 View in CoL , pl. 24, figs 1–6. Nom. nov. for Endodonta rotula ( Melvill & Ponsonby, 1907) , non Hombron & Jacquinot, 1852.
Endodonta (Afrodonta) perfida – Connolly 1912: 128.
Afrodonta perfida – Connolly 1939: 255.
Afrodonta rotula – Solem 1970: 356.
Diagnosis
Shell relatively large, spire distinctly raised, last adult whorl descendant, whorls slightly flat-sided; protoconch evidently smooth (somewhat worn in the material available), diameter ±425 μm; teleoconch sculptured by relatively strong, close-set, compound axial riblets, intervals between riblets with 3–4 microscopic axial threads; spiral sculpture of faint microscopic threads, but for the most part scarcely evident, even in umbilicus; aperture broadly lunate, with no visible dentition; parietal region with a single deeply recessed, low lamella, broadening inwardly; baso-columellar dentition lacking; palatal region with two recessed, relatively long, in-running ridge-like denticles, one at periphery the other in middle of base, visible by transparency; umbilicus wide. Shell translucent, corneous-brown when fresh; diameter up to 1.95 mm.
Material examined
Syntypes (of Trachycystis rotula Melvill & Ponsonby, 1907 )
SOUTH AFRICA • 2 specimens (initially registered in error as a single specimen 1907.7.20.45); E. Cape, Grahamstown, Fernkloof ; J. Farquhar leg.; following ICZN Art 72.7, these are also syntypes of Endodonta (Afrodonta) perfida Burnup, 1912 ; NHMUK 1907.7.20.44 to 45 .
Additional material (used to re-describe and figure taxon under new name Endodonta (Afrodonta) perfida Burnup, 1912 )
SOUTH AFRICA – E. Cape • 1 specimen; Grahamstown, Fernkloof ; J. Farquhar leg.; NHMUK 1912.3.25 • 3 specimens; same collection data as for preceding; NHMUK 1937.12 About NHMUK .30.2790 to 2792 • 2 specimens; same collection data as for preceding; NMSA A9618 About NMSA /T617 • 3 specimens; Grahamstown ; NMSA 2602/T617 • 2 specimens; same collection data as for preceding; NMSA 2603/T617 • 1 specimen; same collection data as for preceding; NMSA A9617 About NMSA /T617 .
Other material
SOUTH AFRICA – E. Cape • 3 specimens; Grahamstown, Fernkloof ; NMSA V3565 About NMSA • 6 specimens; same collection data as for preceding; NMSA V3567 About NMSA • 3 specimens; Grahamstown, Mountain Drive ; NMSA V3569 About NMSA .
Distribution and conservation
A narrow-range endemic ( Fig. 14 View Fig ), known only from the vicinity of Grahamstown, E. Cape, at ± 700 m a.s.l.; in leaf-litter of southern mistbelt forest. The only material available originates from the Albany Museum, Grahamstown and was collected by J. Farquhar in the early 1900s. Surveying forested habitats in the Grahamstown area should thus be identified as a priority in the hope of finding extant colonies of this species.
Remarks
Burnup (1912) proposed the name perfida on the grounds that the species was referable to Endodonta Albers, 1850 and that the name rotula Melvill & Ponsonby, 1907 was thus a junior secondary homonym of Helix rotula Hombron & Jacquinot, 1852 (non Lowe, 1831, nec Gould, 1851), a species that he also believed to be referable to Endodonta . Although rotula Melvill & Ponsonby, 1907 is not in fact referable to Endodonta , following ICZN Art 59.3, the pre-1961 replacement name remains valid.
Resembles Phialodonta aviana gen. et sp. nov. in that the internal dentition is not visible through the aperture. In that species, however, there are two low, rounded, in-running parietal ridges and three inrunning ridge-like palatal denticles. P. aviana gen. et sp. nov. is also somewhat smaller (diameter up to 1.55 mm). See remarks thereunder.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Heterobranchia |
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Punctoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Phialodonta perfida ( Burnup, 1912 )
Herbert, David G. 2020 |
Afrodonta rotula
Solem A. 1970: 356 |
Afrodonta perfida
Connolly M. 1939: 255 |
Endodonta
Burnup H. C. 1912: 337 |
Endodonta (Afrodonta) perfida
Connolly M. 1912: 128 |
Trachycystis rotula
Melvill J. C. & Ponsonby J. H. 1907: 99 |