Oecetis excisa Ulmer
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.277232 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6186077 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C687EA-FFAF-FFC0-FF40-AF0977FCFEED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oecetis excisa Ulmer |
status |
|
Oecetis excisa Ulmer View in CoL
Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6
Oecetis excisa Ulmer 1907: 15 View in CoL (male, female, original description); Flint 1982b: 50 (male, distribution); Paprocki et al. 2004 (distribution).
Oecetis mutila Navás 1918: 22 (male); Schmid 1949: 382 (to synonymy)
Oecetis castilleja Navás 1920a: 134 (female); Schmid 1949: 382 (possible synonym of O. excisa View in CoL ); Flint 1972: 244 (to synonymy).
Oecetis muhnia Navás 1920b: 28 (male); Flint 1972: 244 (to synonymy).
Oecetis apicata Navás 1931: 323 (female); Flint 1982b: 50 (to synonymy).
Oecetis excisa View in CoL is common and widespread in the Neotropical Region. This species was synonymized with O. apicata Navás (1931) by Flint (1982b). In this same work, he stated, “it may be shown that O. excisa View in CoL is a synonym of O. inconspicua ( Walker 1852) View in CoL .” We collected specimens of O. excisa View in CoL and O. inconspicua View in CoL and were able to distinguish the 2 species based on differences in the inferior appendages, tergum X, and wing venation. The genitalia of the 2 species are easily distinguished by the shape of the dorsal process of each inferior appendage (in lateral view), which is longer and thinner in O. excisa View in CoL compared to O. inconspicua View in CoL ( Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 B, 7B). In dorsal view, tergum X of O. excisa View in CoL is broad basally and abruptly narrowed distally ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 C), whereas tergum X of O. inconspicua View in CoL is slightly narrowed and rounded distally ( Fig. 7 C). Finally, R2+3 is forked just before the terminus of R 1 in the hind wings of O. excisa View in CoL , but it is unforked in O. inconspicua View in CoL .
Material examined. ARGENTINA: Salta: Parque Nacional Calilegua, AºYuto, 23º38´40"S, 64º35´53"W, 7.xi.2006, C. Molineri et al. cols., ( IML) ― 1 male; Córdoba: Dique Los Molinos, Feb. 1955, A Willink, ( NMNH) ― 1 male. BRAZIL: Corias St., Lago Feia, near Formosa, 25.iv.1972, ( NMNH) ― 1 male. MEXICO: Linares, Río Camacho, 21–22.vi.1965, ( NMNH) ― 1 male. PARAGUAY: Río Aquiblaban, Cerro Cora, 2.ii.1973, O. S. Flint col., ( NMNH) ― 1 male. VENEZUELA: Base Camp, 0°51´N, 66°10´W, ( NMNH) ― 1 male.
Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, Venezuela.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oecetis excisa Ulmer
Martín, Paola Rueda, Gibon, Francois-Marie & Molina, Carlos Israel 2011 |
Oecetis apicata Navás 1931 : 323
Flint 1982: 50 |
Navas 1931: 323 |
Oecetis castilleja Navás 1920a : 134
Flint 1972: 244 |
Schmid 1949: 382 |
Navas 1920: 134 |
Oecetis muhnia Navás 1920b : 28
Flint 1972: 244 |
Navas 1920: 28 |
Oecetis mutila Navás 1918 : 22
Schmid 1949: 382 |
Navas 1918: 22 |
Oecetis excisa
Flint 1982: 50 |
Ulmer 1907: 15 |