Scatophila Becker, 1869
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2025.012 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03564920-D40B-4ED4-A32B-DD4FA91BA354 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16972895 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C51867-FFE9-B621-31A2-28F965EAF839 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Scatophila Becker, 1869 |
| status |
|
Genus Scatophila Becker, 1869 View in CoL
Scatophila Becker, 1896: 237 View in CoL .
Type species: Ephydra caviceps Stenhammar, 1844 View in CoL , by original designation.
Centromeromyia Frey, 1954: 40 . Type species: Centromeromyia eremita Frey, 1954 View in CoL , by original designation (synonymized by ZATWARNICKI 1991: 329).
The contaminata View in CoL species group
Diagnosis. Face moderately produced anteriorly, not sexually dimorphic; 2–3 large setae on the facial margin and 2 distinct setae on the midface of which the ventral one is nearly as strong as the marginal ( Figs 1–3, 5, 6 View Figs 1–6 , 13, 16, 17 View Figs 13–17 , 23–25 View Figs 21–25 ); gena very narrow; anterior margin of epandrium almost straight ( Figs 7, 10 View Figs 7–12 , 18 View Figs 18–20 ); neohypandrium present, elongate, slightly deflected before the top ( Figs 9, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 20 View Figs 18–20 ); postgonite arcuately deflected, its proximal margin slightly convex, distal process of postgonite triangular, bifurcate on the top ( Figs 9, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 20 View Figs 18–20 ); phallus (= aedeagus) without ventral process, in dorsal view with broadly oval distal margin ( Figs 8, 11 View Figs 7–12 , 19 View Figs 18–20 ); anterior margin of the dorsal opening of phallus almost straight or broadly convex; phallapodeme in lateral view ( Figs 9, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 20 View Figs 18–20 ) refracted medially or arcuately deflected, in dorsal view generally with broad proximal extension and sharp subapical lateral process ( Figs 8, 11 View Figs 7–12 , 19 View Figs 18–20 ).
Species included. Scatophila contaminata ( Stenhammar, 1844) , S. exilis Cresson, 1935 , S. ordinaria Sturtevant & Wheeler, 1954 , and S. pumilio ( Loew, 1860) .
Remark. The placement of S. pumilio in the contaminata group was informally proposed by ZATWARNICKI & MATHIS (1994, illustration legend on page 364 and a remark on page 368) and is confirmed herein.
Key to European species of the contaminata View in CoL group
1 Body black, unicolorous ( Figs 3, 5 View Figs 1–6 ); face of male with white microtomentum ( Figs 2, 5, 6 View Figs 1–6 ), face of female shiny ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–6 ); mesonotum uniform, without pattern ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–6 ); phallapodeme bar-like, gradually broadened posteriorly ( Figs 8, 9 View Figs 7–12 ). ................................................. .......................... S. contaminata ( Stenhammar, 1844) View in CoL .
– Body grey with pattern on mesonotum ( Figs 13, 15, 17 View Figs 13–17 , 22, 24, 25 View Figs 21–25 ); face not shiny, without whitish microtomentum ( Figs 13, 16, 17 View Figs 13–17 ); phallapodeme Y-shaped or helmet-like posteriorly ( Figs 11, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 19, 20 View Figs 18–20 ). ....... 2
2 Acrostichal setulae similar in size ( Fig. 25 View Figs 21–25 ); margin of wing at apex of vein R 4+5 rounded ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–25 ); knob of halter light brown; the male terminalia with epandrial anterior margin slightly rounded medially ( Fig. 10 View Figs 7–12 ), and phallapodeme Y-shaped, split posteriorly ( Fig. 12 View Figs 7–12 ). ...................................... S. pumilio ( Loew, 1860) View in CoL
– Presutural acrostichal setulae larger than others ( Fig. 15 View Figs 13–17 ); wing slightly pointed at apex of vein R 4+5 ( Fig. 14 View Figs 13–17 ); knob of halter white; the male terminalia with epandrial anterior margin even ( Fig. 18 View Figs 18–20 ), and phallapodeme helmet-like in dorsal view ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ). ............................ ......................... S. hirsovae sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Scatophila Becker, 1869
| Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz & Kejval, Zbyněk 2025 |
Centromeromyia
| FREY R. 1954: 40 |
Scatophila
| BECKER T. 1896: 237 |
