Omophlus ( Paromohlus ) pubescens ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4027.1.4 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B00B363D-1EDA-41E0-A38A-C51F41B5B992 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5740671 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C4E40C-FB5A-FF99-FF48-FF488D7CFDEC |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Omophlus ( Paromohlus ) pubescens ( Linnaeus, 1758 ) |
| status |
|
Omophlus ( Paromohlus) pubescens ( Linnaeus, 1758)
Chrysomela pubescens Linnaeus, 1758: 601 .
= Cistela betulae Herbst, 1783: 65 ;
= Chrysomela rufitarsis Leske, 1785: 15 ;
= Omophlus armeriae Curtis, 1836: 622 ;
= Omophlus pinicola L. Redtenbacher, 1849: 604 ;
= Omophlus frigidus Mulsant, 1856b: 81 ;
= Omophlus pubescens Mulsant, 1856b: 84 ;
= Omophus amerinae Kirsch, 1869: 107.
Distribution in Iran. East Azarbaijan ( Modarres Awal 1997 under Omophlus betulae (Herbst, 1783)) . General distribution. Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Great Britain, Hungary, Iran, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Alleculinae |
|
Genus |
Omophlus ( Paromohlus ) pubescens ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
| Novák, Vladimir & Ghahari, Hassan 2015 |
Omophlus frigidus
| Mulsant 1856: 81 |
Omophlus pubescens
| Mulsant 1856: 84 |
Chrysomela rufitarsis
| Leske 1785: 15 |
Cistela betulae
| Herbst 1783: 65 |
Chrysomela pubescens
| Linnaeus 1758: 601 |