Osmylus Latreille, 1802
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4581.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20A9776D-AE5F-41BC-A35B-0C5E42EDFE48 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C47176-FFA7-8D12-7AD2-0355FDF490B8 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Osmylus Latreille, 1802 |
| status |
|
Osmylus Latreille, 1802 View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 , 18–21 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 )
(= Hyposmylus McLachlan, 1870: 200 . Type species: Osmylus punctipennis Walker, 1860: 183 )
(= Dictyosmylus Navás, 1910: 189 . Type species: Dictyosmylus lunatus Navás, 1910: 189 )
(= Plesiosmylus Makarkin, 1985: 41 . Type species: Osmylus tessellatus McLachlan, 1875: 36 )
(= Plethosmylus Krüger, 1913a: 43 . Type species: Osmylus hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875: 181 )
Type species. Hemerobius maculatus Fabricius, 1787: 247 (by monotypy).
Diagnosis. Wings elongate, broad, posterior margin occasionally straight distally; FW typically with irregular mottled infuscation; HW mostly hyaline except for pterostigma wing margin and wing base; FW subcostal veinlets often forked near wing margin distally, interlinking crossveins present or absent; RP with at least two gradate series in both wings, dense crossveins in basal 3/4 of wing, RP1 originating close to origin of RP; FW M fork close to, or opposite to RP1; FW cubital area with crossveins present or absent; female forecoxa typically with a prominent process on the anterior surface; male tergite 9 with variably-shaped dorsal processes often present; gonarcus mainly external, enlarged, sclerotized and densely setose in lateral view; entoprocessus shape variable and poorly sclerotised. Female genitalia with sternite 8 variable in shape, sometimes with lateral processes; spermatheca oval or cylindrical.
Comments. Some authors further divide Osmylus into two subgenera ( Osmylus and Plesiosmylus ), although the basis for at least Plesiosmylus is problematic due to a lack of apomorphic characters ( Makarkin 1985). Matsuno & Yoshitomi (2016) described the larvae of three Japanese species and found that larval characters also did not support the division of subgenera as proposed by Makarkin (1985). They also synonymised O. kisoensis Iwata with O. pryeri McLachlan. Krüger (1915) erected Plethosmylus largely based on the interlinking of costal veinlets with crossveins, but this has not been accepted by some subsequent authors (e.g., Nakahara, 1914; Makarkin, 1985; Sekimoto & Yoshizawa, 2011). Xu et al. (2016) provided a key to species of Osmylus , but it requires examination of both male and female genitalic characters for an identification. The lack of external diagnosable features and limited specimens on which species have been described means that we do not fully understand the intraspecific variability expressed in the genus and how it impacts the validity of all species described. Osmylus appears to mostly be distributed in the temperate Palaearctic region.
Included species.
O. angustimarginatus Xu, et al., 2016 ( China)
O. atomatus (Yang et al. in Huang et al., 1988) ( China) View in CoL
O. biangulus Wang & Liu, 2010 ( China)
O. bipapillatus Wang & Liu, 2010 ( China)
O. cilicicus Krüger, 1913c ( Turkey) View in CoL
O. conanus Yang, 1987 ( China) View in CoL
O. decoratus Nakahara, 1914 View in CoL ( Japan, Russia)
O. elegantissimus Kozhanchikov, 1951 View in CoL ( Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Ukraine, Russia)
O. fuberosus Yang, 1997 ( China) View in CoL
O. fulvicephalus ( Scopoli, 1763) (Europe) View in CoL
O. hyalinatus McLachlan, 1875 View in CoL ( Japan, Russia)
O. lucalatus Wang & Liu, 2010 ( China) View in CoL
O. maoershanicola Xu, et al., 2016 ( China)
O. megistus Yang, 1987 ( China) View in CoL
O. minisculus Yang, 1987 ( China) View in CoL
O. multiguttatus McLachlan, 1870 View in CoL ( Turkey, Ukraine)
O. pachycaudatus Wang & Liu, 2010 ( China) View in CoL
O. posticatus Banks, 1947 ( China) View in CoL
O. pryeri McLachlan, 1875 View in CoL ( Japan, Russia) (= O. kisoensis Iwata, 1928 View in CoL ; = O. shikokuensis Kuwayama, 1953 View in CoL ) O. punctipennis Walker, 1860 View in CoL ( China, India)
O. shaanxiensis Xu, et al., 2016 ( China)
O. taiwanensis New, 1991 View in CoL ( China)
O. tessellatus McLachlan, 1875 View in CoL ( Japan, Russia)
O. wuyishanus Yang, 1999 ( China) View in CoL
O. xizangensis Yang et al. in Huang et al., 1988 ( China) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Osmylinae |
Osmylus Latreille, 1802
| Winterton, Shaun L., Martins, Caleb Califre, Makarkin, Vladimir, Ardila-Camacho, Adrian & Wang, Yongjie 2019 |
O . angustimarginatus
| Xu 2016 |
O . maoershanicola
| Xu 2016 |
O . shaanxiensis
| Xu 2016 |
O. lucalatus
| Wang & Liu 2010 |
O . pachycaudatus
| Wang & Liu 2010 |
O . zheanus (
| Yang & Liu 2001 |
O . wuyishanus
| Yang 1999 |
O . fuberosus
| Yang 1997 |
O . taiwanensis
| New 1991 |
O . conanus
| Yang 1987 |
O . megistus
| Yang 1987 |
O . minisculus
| Yang 1987 |
O. shikokuensis
| Kuwayama 1953 |
O . elegantissimus
| Kozhanchikov 1951 |
O . posticatus
| Banks 1947 |
O . kisoensis
| Iwata 1928 |
O . decoratus
| Nakahara 1914 |
O . cilicicus Krüger, 1913c ( Turkey )
| Kruger 1913 |
O . hyalinatus
| McLachlan 1875 |
O . pryeri
| McLachlan 1875 |
O. tessellatus
| McLachlan 1875 |
O . multiguttatus
| McLachlan 1870 |
O . punctipennis
| Walker 1860 |
O . fulvicephalus (
| Scopoli 1763 |
