Acropimpla teoceloana Khalaim, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.31.4.10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287F8-FFCE-FFFC-A246-FE52047391AB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acropimpla teoceloana Khalaim |
status |
sp. nov. |
Acropimpla teoceloana Khalaim , sp.n.
Figs 1–9 View Figs 1–5 View Figs 6–9 .
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Holotype: ♀ ( UNAM), Mexico,[State of] Veracruz, Municipality Teocelo , Malaise trap, August 2017, coll. M. López-Ortega.
COMPARISON. The new species is immediately distinguished from three other North American species of Acropimpla by extensive brownish yellow markings on scutellum, postscutellum ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–5 ) and metasomal tergites 1–4 ( Figs 7, 9 View Figs 6–9 ), propodeum with lateromedian longitudinal carinae developed mediodorsally ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–5 ), first tergite with lateromedian longitudinal carinae very strong and reaching posterior margin of first tergite ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–9 ), and by the shorter ovipositor ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–5 ). Acropimpla teoceloana sp.n. also differs from another Mexican species, A. tequila , by complete pleural and submetapleural carinae ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ), and petiolate areolet in the fore wing ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–5 ), and from two Nearctic species by entirely reddish brown hind femur ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ).
DESCRIPTION. Female. Body length 8.8 mm. Fore wing length about 6.6 mm.
Antennal flagellum with 23/24 flagellomeres. Mandible broad basally, strongly tapered in basal half, with upper tooth broader and somewhat longer than the lower tooth. Clypeus 1.8 times as broad as long, with lower margin bilobate ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–5 ). Malar space short, about 0.2 times as long as basal mandibular width. Face transverse, 1.25 times as broad as long, with weak median longitudinal prominence, with fine distinct punctures, smooth between punctures. Vertex and gena polished, with very fine and sparse punctures. Eye with short and sparse setae. Lateral ocellus separated from eye by its own maximum diameter ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–9 ). Occipital carina mediodorsally dipped and narrowly interrupted ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–9 ).
Epomia distinct, curved; pronotum behind epomia polished ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–5 ). Mesoscutum punctate on subpolished and weakly shining background; punctures denser on median lobe anteriorly and sparser posteriorly. Notaulus deep, extending in anterior 0.4 of mesoscutum ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–9 ). Mesopleuron polished, with fine and sparse punctures. Metapleuron polished, impunctate ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ). Submetapleural carina strong, complete ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ). Propodeum strongly convex in lateral view ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ), with lateral longitudinal carinae absent anteriorly and posteriorly, but distinct centrally ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–5 ); propodeum punctate laterally ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ), polished dorsally, impunctate anteriorly and posteriorly, and with moderately dense punctures centrally ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–5 ). Pleural carina distinct.
Fore wing ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–5 ) with vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS; areolet strongly oblique, triangular, petiolate above, receiving vein 2m-cu near its outer corner; petiole almost as long as vein 2rs-m. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly above middle, distal section of CU distinct ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–9 ).
First tergite of metasoma about as long as posteriorly broad, abruptly angulated centrally in lateral view; lateromedi- an longitudinal carinae strong and complete (i.e. almost reaching posterior margin of first tergite), strongly converging towards centre in anterior 0.4 of tergite and weakly converging in posterior 0.6 of tergite ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–9 ); dorsolateral longitudinal carinae complete, quite strong before and behind spiracle. Second tergite distinctly transverse, 0.6 times as long as maximally broad. Tergites 2–5 densely punctate, with posterior margins smooth, with subbasal and subapical transverse impressions delimiting convex central part on each tergite (second tergite with smooth basomedian convexity across subbasal transverse impression) ( Fig. 9 View Figs 6–9 ); tergite 6 with sparser punctures, with subbasal transverse impression and posterior smooth margin reduced. Sclerotised parts of sternites 2–5 brownish black. Ovipositor straight, slightly compressed laterally, projecting beyond hind margin of subgenital plate by about 1.4 times length of hind tibia; ovipositor sheath 1.6 times as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–5 ); apex of ovipositor with weak dorsal angle, dorsal valve beyond nodus slightly concave, lower valve with about four oblique teeth ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–5 ).
Head and mesosoma predominantly black ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–5 ). Antenna pale brown basally to dark brown apically; lower halfs of scape and pedicel yellow. Clypeus yellow-brown ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–5 ). Basal half of mandible yellow-brown, apical half reddish brown, teeth black. Palpi brownish yellow. Pronotum with lower corner, posterior corner and upper margin behind base of notaulus brownish yellow. Tegula, mesepimeron, dorsal parts of scutellum and postscutellum yellow ( Figs 1, 4 View Figs 1–5 ). Posterior part of metapleuron and posterolateral corners of propodeum narrowly brownish yellow ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ). Wings distinctly infumate with yellowish brown ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–5 ); pterostigma brown. Legs predominantly whitish yellow to brownish yellow; hind leg with coxa and femur brownish, tibia whitish with distal 0.2 fuscous ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ); tarsomeres 5 of all legs infuscate. First tergite brownish yellow, mediodorsally with dark brown marks ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–9 ). Tergites 2 and 3 brownish yellow, with dark brown transverse bands in anterior about 0.3 and posterior 0.15 ( Fig. 9 View Figs 6–9 ). Tergite 4 dark brown in anterior half and on posterior margin, remain- der brownish yellow ( Fig. 9 View Figs 6–9 ). Tergite 5 and following tergites dark brown to brownish black.
Male. Unknown.
ETYMOLOGY. The new species is named after the type locality, Teocelo [Municipio].
DISTRIBUTION. Mexico (Veracruz).
UNAM |
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.