Eleodes, Eschscholtz, 1829
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-69.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52ED5896-72C3-4D1F-B12D-E7A02FDB7346 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C187D0-FFB1-FFE2-FF55-3833EFE5FC2B |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Eleodes |
status |
|
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF ELEODES SUBGENUS PROMUS OF THE UNITED STATES
The subgenus Promus is represented in the United States by eight species. Eleodes knullorum is highly variable ( Triplehorn 1971) and thus keys to two distinct forms, which occur sympatrically in southwestern Texas ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). The definitional boundaries of E. knullorum may need revision when examined in the context of the group’ s entire geographic range, which includes northern Mexico.
1. Elytral disc strongly flattened, lateral margin distinctly carinate ( Fig. 5A–B View Fig ) ...................... ............................................. E. opacus (Say)
1′. Elytral disc laterally rounded.......................2
2. Body strongly fusiform, males without profemoral spines, anterior angles of pronotum rounded ( Fig. 5E–F View Fig ) ...................................... .................................. E. fusiformis LeConte
2′. Body not strongly fusiform, males with single profemoral spine, anterior pronotal angles often acute.................................................3
3. Elytra clothed with minute yellow setae originating from small, evenly spaced punctures ....................... E. spiculiferous Triplehorn
3′. Elytra glabrous, without setae, punctation variable.........................................................4
4. Elytra with deeply impressed, sulcate striae, intervals convex ( Fig. 1 View Fig )................................ ..................................... E. compositus Casey
4′. Elytra without sulcate striae........................5
5. Elytra with>25 conspicuous, neatly arranged, longitudinal striae comprised of small punctures, anterior pronotal angles rounded ( Fig. 5C–D View Fig ) .................................. E. striolatus LeConte
5′. Elytra without neatly arranged striae, or with few, large punctures, anterior pronotal angles acute ............................................. 6
6. Elytra with conspicuous strial punctures, often quite large ( Fig. 5G–H View Fig )........... E. goryi Solier
6′. Elytra with small, inconspicuous punctures ( Figs. 2–4 View Fig View Fig View Fig ) .................................................... 7
7. Pronotum constricted behind anterior angles, evenly arcuate in posterior half, prosternal process large, forming triangular wedge ( Fig. 2 View Fig ) ................................. E. subnitens LeConte
7′. Pronotum with lateral margins evenly arcuate anteriorly, sinuate posteriorly, prosternum variable, not forming a large triangular wedge ( Figs. 3–4 View Fig View Fig )....................................................... 8
8. Prosternum flat, horizontal, extending beyond procoxae. Male profemoral tooth blunt, dentate ( Fig. 4A–B View Fig )................................................ ............... E. knullorum Triplehorn (form 1)
8′. Prosternum declivous behind procoxae. Males with strong profemoral spines ....................... 9
9. Southwestern Texas. Abdomen not attenuate posteriorly, female gonostyle reniform, inserted on anterior dorsal surface of coxite ( Fig. 4C–D View Fig ) ................. E. knullorum Triplehorn (form 2)
9′. Arizona, southwestern New Mexico. Abdomen attenuate posteriorly, female gonostyle truncate mesally, inserted on posterior face of coxite ( Fig. 3 View Fig )............................................ ........... E. madrensis Johnston , new species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |