Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4896.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0824AFA4-4E8B-419B-972C-0FA0A88538FF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4387683 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C08789-C533-4F6B-FF62-D12F89F9FB15 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931 |
status |
|
Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931 View in CoL
Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4
Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931: 271 View in CoL , fig. 19G–H; Majumder & Tikader, 1991: 152, figs 320–325; Biswas & Raychaudhuri, 2000: 132, figs 8–14.
Sphingius delakharae Pawaria et al., 2018: 164 View in CoL , figs 1.1–4, 2.5–8, 3.1–6, 4.7–10. syn. nov.
Type material. S. barkudensis : lectotype Ƌ (here designated) and paralectotypes 2♀ from INDIA: Odisha (formerly Orissa): Ganjam: Chilika Lake (= Chilka Lake ): Barkuda Island (formerly part of Madras Presidency ) (19°33’12.7’’N, 85°08’47.2’’E), 13 m a.s.l., leg. F.H. Gravely, 3–19 August 1919, deposited in NZC-ZSI (no register number), examined. S. delakharae GoogleMaps : holotype ♀ from INDIA: Madhya Pradesh: Chhindwara: Delakhari (22°25’26.4’’N, 78°36’42.3’’E), 558 m a.s.l., leg. Atul K. Bodkhe, 15 August 2017, deposited in SRL JDPSM (no register number), not examined GoogleMaps . Paratype Ƌ, same as holotype, not examined. The colour images provided in the original description ( Pawaria et al. 2018: figs 2.5, 7–8, 4.7, 9–10) are diagnostic and were used for comparison .
Other material examined. INDIA: Kerala: Thrissur, Chimmony Wildlife Sanctuary , 10°25’06.80’’N, 76°32’07.25’’E, 709 m a.s.l., 23 July 2013, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from ground, by hand: 1 subadult GoogleMaps Ƌ, 2♀, 1 juvenile ( ADSH562701 View Materials ). Ernakulam, Illithodu , 10°11’55.94’’N, 76°33’00.57’’E, 24 m a.s.l., 25 February 2014, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from ground, by hand: 3Ƌ, 5♀ ( ADSH562702 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Sphingius barkudensis are closely related to S. penicillus Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001 , but can be separated by the following features: males by long, straight retrolateral tibial apophysis without basal tuft of setae (retrolateral tibial apophysis of S. penicillus short, stout with apical curvature and with basal tuft of setae), median tegular apophysis with triangular prolateral process (median tegular apophysis of S. penicillus with spine-like anterior process) and medially originating and straight embolus ( S. penicillus with prolaterally originating and curved embolus); females by short, stout copulatory ducts, which are long, slender and inverted U-shaped in S. penicillus (compare Figs 3I, K View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 A–B, D with Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: figs 848–851).
Redescription. Male (ADSH562702; Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 , C–H). Carapace, eye region, chelicerae, fangs, opisthosoma, pedipalpal segments brownish; clypeus, endites, labium, leg segments, spinnerets yellowish-brown; opisthosoma dorsally provided with paired anterior and median white spots. Carapace shiny, sparsely covered with erect black hairs, with prominent intercoxal discs; cephalic groove less prominent; thoracic part rebordered, with irregularly scattered black smudges. Fovea longitudinal, straight, reddish. AME black, others pearly white. Clypeus provided with a single row of erect setae. Chilum prominent, inverted triangular. Chelicerae baso-retrolaterally provided with a bunch of long narrow hairs, with an elongated, unmodified shaggy/bent hair originating near the base of fang ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F–H, arrow 2: Sh); promargin with four teeth, retromargin with two denticles, middle promarginal teeth largest ( Fig. 3H View FIGURE 3 ); promargin bordered by a series of long hairs with ventrally oriented tips and are smaller than the shaggy/ bent hair ( Fig. 3F View FIGURE 3 ); fangs moderately long. Endites with reduced scopulae. Sternum rebordered, with coxal and intercoxal extensions, with setae at margins ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ). Metatarsi III and IV provided with distal preening brush, that on III prominent ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 , arrow 1). Pedicel encircled with collar ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ). Opisthosoma tubular, with complete dorsal scutum, ventral scutum smaller than dorsum ( Fig. 3A, C View FIGURE 3 ); venter medially depressed ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ). Anal tubercle prominent ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ). Spinnerets basally encircled with black hairs. Body length 5.08. Carapace length 2.23, width 1.78. Opisthosoma length 2.85, width 1.51. Eye diameters: ALE 0.13, AME 0.10, PLE 0.08, PME 0.11. Eye interdistances: ALE–PLE 0.06, AME–ALE 0.01, AME–AME 0.04, AME–PME 0.11, PME–PLE 0.05, PME–PME 0.05. Chelicerae length 0.83. Clypeus height at ALEs 0.09, at AMEs 0.13. Chilum length 0.06, width 0.26. Measurements of pedipalp and legs. Pedipalp 2.12 [0.69, 0.37, 0.32, 0.74], I 6.82 [1.89, 0.96, 1.54, 1.35, 1.08], II 5.74 [1.56, 0.82, 1.16, 1.22, 0.98], III 4.79 [1.30, 0.69, 0.91, 1.10, 0.79], IV 7.76 [2.01, 0.84, 1.73, 2.08, 1.10]. Leg formula: 4123. Spination: pedipalp: femur do 1, patella pl 1 do 1, tibia pl 1 pld 2 do 1 rld 1, tarsus/cymbium pld 1 plv 3 do 1 rl 1 rlv 1; legs: femur I pl 1 do 1, II–III do 1, IV do 2; patellae I–IV spineless; tibiae I–II spineless, III pl 1 pld 3 plv 1 rl 1 rld 1 rlv 3, IV pl 2 plv 3 rl 2 rlv 3; metatarsi I–II spineless, III pl 1 plv 1 rl 1 rlv 1, IV pl 2 plv 4 rl 2 rlv 2; tarsi I–IV spineless. Pedipalp ( Figs 3I View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 A–B). Retrolateral tibial apophysis long, gradually narrowing towards blunt apex ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 : RTA). Cymbium dorsally with dense mat of hairs ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 , arrow). Bulbous roughly ovoid, longitudinally divided, 2/3 rd of retrolateral part less sclerotised. Median tegular apophysis sclerotised, roughly roundish with prolateral triangular process, situated disto-retrolaterally ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–B: MA, PP). Accessory tegular apophysis apparently absent. Embolus postero-medially originating, narrow, slightly wavy, with broad embolic base, with blunt tip, directed at 9 o’clock ventrally ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 : E, EB). Conductor thin, wide, membranous, lamellate, originating disto-medially ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–B: C).
Female (ADSH562702; Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Like male except the following: cheliceral promargin with three teeth. Sternum with less prominent intercoxal extensions. Opisthosoma elongate-ovoid without scuta, creamy with black shades dorsally and laterally; dorsum with four pairs of white spots: one anterior, one median and two posteriors, with a large white patch just above anal tubercle. Leg segments brownish with black shades. Pedicel lacks collar. Palp with single claw. Body length 5.68. Carapace length 2.36, width 1.97. Opisthosoma length 3.32, width 1.71. Eye diameters: ALE 0.13, AME 0.10, PLE 0.12, PME 0.11. Eye interdistances: ALE–PLE 0.06, AME–ALE 0.02, AME–AME 0.03, AME–PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.07, PME–PME 0.06. Chelicerae length 0.86. Clypeus height at ALEs 0.05, at AMEs 0.09. Chilum length 0.03, width 0.19. Measurements of palp and legs. Palp 2.39 [0.81, 0.45, 0.46, 0.67], I 7.08 [1.95, 1.13, 1.53, 1.38, 1.09], II 5.84 [1.65, 0.89, 1.24, 1.16, 0.90], III 5.20 [1.42, 0.77, 0.97, 1.28, 0.76], IV 8.91 [2.33, 1.14, 1.85, 2.27, 1.32]. Leg formula: 4123. Spination: palp: femur do 1 v 3, patella pl 1 do 1, tibia pl 1 pld 2 do 2, tarsus/cymbium pl 2 pld 1 plv 1 do 1 rl 1 rlv 1; legs: femur I pl 1 do 1, II–III do 1, IV do 2; patellae I–IV spineless; tibiae I–II do 1, III pl 2 plv 3 do 1 rl 2 rlv 2, IV pl 2 plv 3 rl 2 rlv 3; metatarsi I–II spineless, III pl 1 plv 2 rl 1 rlv 1, IV pl 1 pld 2 plv 3 v 1 rl 2 rlv 2; tarsi I–IV spineless. Genitalia ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 J–K, 4C–D). Epigynum with a small anterior, sclerotised hood, with membranous epigynal plate ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 : AH, EP). Copulatory openings crescent-shaped, medio-laterally placed ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 : CO). Copulatory ducts short, stout, with slight median constriction, connected to outer surface of spermathecae ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 : CD). Bursae globular with slender stalks, originating on median portion of copulatory ducts ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 : B). Spermathecae spherical, situated posteriorly ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 : S). Fertilization ducts long, spine-like ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 : FD).
Justification for the synonymy. Pawaria et al. (2018) described S. delakharae on the basis of seven female and one male specimen collected in Madhya Pradesh. Even though we could not examine the type specimens of this species, the colour images of the genitalia provided in the original description are diagnostic and show that this species shares the features of S. barkudensis : long, straight retrolateral tibial apophysis, medially oriented narrow embolus, round median tegular apophysis with anterior triangular process, epigynum with a single anterior hood and vulva with short copulatory ducts and globular spermathecae (compare Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 I–K, 4A–D with Pawaria et al. 2018: figs 2.7–8, 4.9–10). Based on these observations, we propose S. delakharae a junior synonym of S. barkudensis .
The ZSI collection has two glass bottles for S. barkudensis . The first bottle is labelled as “ Types ” (5754/H2) and contains a male and a female specimens in fairly good condition. The female genitalia were intact whereas the left pedipalp of the male was detached, but was not found inside the bottle. The second bottle (1770/18) contains five females with intact genitalia, two female prosoma and two juveniles, all in fairly good condition.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sphingius barkudensis Gravely, 1931
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2020 |
Sphingius delakharae
Pawaria, S. & Bodkhe, A. & Kamble, S. & Uniyal, V. & Talwar, S. 2018: 164 |
Sphingius barkudensis
Biswas, V. & Raychaudhuri, D. 2000: 132 |
Majumder, S. C. & Tikader, B. K. 1991: 152 |
Gravely, F. H. 1931: 271 |