Mystrothrips, Priesner. These, 1949

Mound, Laurence A. & Tree, Desley J., 2018, Asia-Australia distribution patterns among species of Mystrothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae), with two new species, Zootaxa 4526 (3), pp. 347-357 : 348

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4526.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36B290D8-C78F-480C-9B55-67E8C9E55AA2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951270

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE3108-FFE3-FF9F-66CD-8E3CFA42AAA7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mystrothrips
status

 

Key to Mystrothrips View in CoL species

[* based on description]

1. Prosternal basantra well-developed ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ); antennal segment IV with 4 sense cones; antennal segments I–IV with one or more capitate setae.................................................................................. clavatoris View in CoL

-. Prosternal basantra weak or absent ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–8 , 11 View FIGURES 9–15 ); antennal segment IV with 3 sense cones; antennal segments I–IV with apical setae all acute........................................................................................ 2

2. Antennal segment III with 3 sense cones................................................................... 3

-. Antennal segment III with 2 or 0 sense cones................................................................ 4

3. Postocellar setae with apices broadly expanded (Fig. 16)................................................. dilatus View in CoL

-. Postocellar setae finely acute............................................................ dammermanni group

4. Antennal segment III with 0 sense cones; compound eye with 3 facets ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 ); maxillary stylets about 0.3 of head with apart; inner apex of fore tarsus with minute recurved tooth in both sexes.................................... nomadus View in CoL sp.n.

-. Antennal segment III with 2 sense cones; compound eye of microptera with at least 7 facets ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); maxillary stylets about 0.5 of head width apart; female without, male with or without fore tarsal tooth..................................... 5

5. Head smooth medially, without strong reticulate sculpture ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–28 ).......................................... levis View in CoL *

-. Head with well-developed reticulate sculpture............................................................... 6

6. Maxillary stylets scarcely retracted anterior to occipital ridge ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); meso and metanotal reticulate lines with many small tubercles ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–8 ); male without fore tarsal tooth................................................ brachystylis View in CoL sp.n.

-. Maxillary stylets retracted almost to postocular setae; meso and metanotal reticulate sculpture lines smooth (Figs 20, 21); male with small fore tarsal tooth....................................................................... reteanum View in CoL

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF