Microchelonus exceptus, Papp, Jenő, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.62.3.217.2016 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BDD709-4066-8424-9CE1-FAF8FD5AFB20 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Microchelonus exceptus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microchelonus exceptus sp. n.
(Figs 182–191)
Materialexamined – Femaleholotype: CostaRica, SanJosé, Escazu, 28–31 May 1988, leg. F. D. Parker. – Holotype is in good condition: (1) glued direct to the pin by right gena andrightpropleuron; (2) rightforecoxa + femurlessvisibleowingtothemounting. Holotype is deposited in HNHM, Hym. Typ. No. 12234 .
Etymology – Thenewspeciesreceivedthename “exceptus” indicatingitsexceptional similarity to M. candidus sp. n.
Figs 182–197. 182–191. Microchelonus exceptus sp. n. (f, holotype): 182 = ultimate four flagellomeres, 183 = headindorsalviewwithindicationofitssculpture, 184 = headinlateral viewwithindicationofitssculpture, 185 = clypeus, 186 = propodealcarinaindorsalview, 187 = propodeum, 188 = hindfemur, 189 = distalpartofrightforewing, 190 = carapacein dorsalviewwithindicationofitssculpture, 191 = carapaceinlateralview. 192–197. Microchelonusfascis Papp, 2010 (f, holotype): 192 = scape, pedicelandproximal / distalpartof flagellomeres, 193 = headindorsalviewwithindicationofitssculpture, 194 = hindfemur + tibia, 195 = distalpartofrightforewing, 196 = carapaceindorsalviewwithindicationof itssculpture, 197 = posteriorthirdofcarapaceinventralview.
Description of the female holotype – Body 3.6 mm long. Antenna shorter than body (2.8 mmlong), andwith 16 antennomeres. Scapeglobose, 2.3 timesaslongasbroad (cf. Fig. 453). Firstflagellomerefivetimesaslongasbroadapically, furtherflagellomeresshorteningsothatpenultimateflagellomeresubcubic, 1.3 timeslongerthanbroad (Fig. 182). – Headindorsalviewtransverse, twiceasbroadaslong, eye 1.3 timesaslongastemple, templerounded (Fig. 183). OOLone- thirdlongerthanPOL. Eyeinlateralviewtwiceas highaswide, genabeyondeyeclearlybroadeningventrallyandjustwiderthaneye, gena polishedwithhairpunctures (Fig. 184 seearrows). Clypeus 1.25 timesaswidebelowas highmedially, itslowermarginconvex (Fig. 185). Clypeuspunctate, interpuncturesshiny. Facedenselyrugulose, headabovetransverso-denselysubstriolate, dull.
Mesosomainlateralview 1.4 timesaslongashigh. Mesoscutumscabrous, scutellum roughlyrugose (cf. Fig. 49). Propodealcarinawithfoursmalldenticules (Fig. 186), propodeumonitshorizontalsurfacewithamedianparallel-shapedareolabasalis, otherwise areolated (Fig. 187). Hindfemur 3.8 timesaslongasbroadmedially (Fig 188). Hindbasi- tarsusaslongastarsomeres 2–4 combined.
Forewingshorterthanbody (2.9 mmlong). Pterostigma 2.6 timesaslongaswide andisuing r justdistallyfromitsmiddle, r 1.4 timeslongerthan 3–SR, 1–R1 0.6 timesas longaspterostigma (Fig. 189 seearrows).
Carapaceindorsalview 1.8 timesaslongasbroadposteriorly, hindthirdofcarapace polished (Fig. 190). Carapaceinlateralview 3.8 timesaslongashighposteriorly, declivous behind (Fig. 191). Carapaceapico-ventrallynotincurved (cf. Fig. 108). Ovipositorsheath short, concealed.
Groundcolourofbodyblack. Scapeandpedicelbrownish. Flagellumblack, third flagellomereapicallyandfourthflagellomereentirelystrawyellow. Palpilightbrownish. Tegulablackish. Carapaceanteriorlyandbeforeitsmiddlewithatransverselemonyellow band. Forelegyellow, femurbrown. Middleandhindlegsblack, trochanters, femoraand tibiaebasallystrawyellow, tarsidarkwithlittleyellowishpattern. Wingsbrownishfumous, pterostigmadarkbrown, parastigmalemonyellow. Veinsyellowtobrownish, brown.
Maleandhostunknown.
Distribution – Costa Rica.
Taxonomic position – The new species, Microchelonus exceptus , is closest to M. candidus consideringtheircommonfeatures: longtempleindorsalview, short 1–R1 offorewingandyellowringofflagellum; thetwospeciesdiffer fromeachotherbythefollowingtraitskeyed:
HNHM |
Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.