Actinoconchus sp.

Sun, Yuanlin & Baliński, Andrzej, 2011, Silicified Mississippian brachiopods from Muhua, southern China: Rhynchonellides, athyridides, spiriferides, spiriferinides, and terebratulides, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (4), pp. 793-842 : 813-814

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2010.0106

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB9544-FFBA-A669-FF2A-FBCA9F68FA60

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Actinoconchus sp.
status

 

Actinoconchus sp.

Fig. 14 View Fig .

Material.—Seven complete shells, 10 ventral, and 9 dorsal valves from sample MH1.

Description.—Shell transversely elliptical to oval in outline, subequally biconvex, sulcus and fold lacking. Ventral interior with short, subparallel and anteriorly divergent dental plates. Inside dorsal valve a small cardinal plate present, with small circular foramen, and postero−laterally bordered by elevated inner socket ridges (cardinal flanges; Fig. 14F View Fig ); low, sharp myophragm divides medially the dorsal adductor scars ( Fig. 14D View Fig 2). Externally with strong, widely distributed, concentric growth lines and flat, very long flanges; flanges do not disintegrate to spine−like projections, but are densely longitudinally striated ( Fig. 14D View Fig 4 View Fig , G).

Dimensions in mm, shell: length 7.1, width 8.8, thickness 4.7; largest complete ventral valve: length 9.8, width 12.2.

Remarks.— Xu and Yao (1988) described two new and two other species of Actinoconchus from the earliest Carboniferous of the Nanbiancun section, Guanxi Province, Southern China. The exterior of these species, as well as the details of ornamentation illustrated for three of those forms strongly suggest that they do not represent Actinoconchus but rather Cleiothyridina .

The species from Muhua are quite close externally to the type species of the genus, i.e., Actinoconchus paradoxus M’Coy, 1844 (see Brunton 1980) having similar shell shape but differing mainly in having less posteriorly protruding umbo of the ventral valve. The former are much less expanded

http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0106

laterally than Actinoconchus expansus expansus (Phillips, 1836) and A. expansus patulus Brunton, 1980 but more wide than Actinoconchus oblongus (Sowerby, 1840) and Actinoconchus obtusus ( M’Coy, 1844) . Brunton (1980) placed provisionally A. obtusus in synonymy with A. oblongus . Several other lamellose athyridids similar to Actinoconchus but with persistent ventral sulcus were placed by Jin and Fang (1983) within genus Lamellosathyris Jin and Fang, 1983 .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF