Merospirifer sp.

Sun, Yuanlin & Baliński, Andrzej, 2011, Silicified Mississippian brachiopods from Muhua, southern China: Rhynchonellides, athyridides, spiriferides, spiriferinides, and terebratulides, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (4), pp. 793-842 : 825

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2010.0106

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB9544-FF8E-A65C-FCEC-FA9498FDF7AC

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Merospirifer sp.
status

 

Merospirifer sp.

Fig. 25 View Fig .

Material.—Very fragmentary six ventral and three dorsal valves.

Remarks.—This smooth shelled spriferoid is characterised by the presence of thin subparallel dental adminicula and absence of ventral median septum and crural plates. In the apical region of the delthyrium there is a small, strongly indented anteriorly plate which is attached to the dental flanges slightly below the interarea, but sometimes becomes strongly convex ( Fig. 25A View Fig 2, A 4 View Fig ). Dental adminicula bent medially just below the delthyrial margin then slightly diverge to the valve floor ( Fig. 25D View Fig 1 View Fig ) similarly as it was noted in Merospirifer linguifera (Phillips, 1836) by Brunton (1984). The surface micro−ornamentation is well preserved on one specimen in the form of elongated, densely packed exopunctae ( Fig. 25A View Fig 6 View Fig ).

The present very fragmentary material differs from Eomartinioposis Sokolskaya, 1941 by having very weak ventral sulcus. The former differs also from Globispirifer Tachibana, 1964 in having not elongated shell and from Kisilia Nalivkin, 1979 in having smooth shell and strong and long dental adminicula. The specimens are also similar in general shape of the shell to Crassumbo Carter, 1967 but differ in having well differentiated dental adminicula which are not buried in the umbonal callus. The specimens from the Muhua Formation are the most similar both externally and internally to Merospirifer Reed, 1949 which was re−described by Brunton (1984). Stratigraphic and geographic range.—According to Brunton (1984: 96) the genus occurs throughout the Viséan in the British Isles but some closely related species have been also reported from the Tournaisian. The present material is very poor and comes from samples MH1, MH2, M2–8, and GB.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0106

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF