Heteroscelis servillii Laporte, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5278.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DFCD52A4-3A24-460C-8309-329A26BCE322 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7915281 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BADF22-9335-FFF4-FF22-3095FCFB5DD5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Heteroscelis servillii Laporte, 1833 |
status |
|
Heteroscelis servillii Laporte, 1833
( Figs. 1–14 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 )
Heteroscelis servillii Laporte, 1833: 86 ; Stål 1870: 31; Kirkaldy 1909: 30 (syn.).
Phyllocheirus servillei: Spinola 1837: 306
Phyllochirus servillei: Amyot & Serville 1843: 80 (emen); Stål 1862: 93; Stål 1870: 31 (syn.); Kirkaldy 1909: 30.
Agerrus remipes Stål, 1859: 434 ; Stål 1862: 93 (syn.); Schouteden 1907: 19; Kirkaldy 1909: 30.
Bodetria brenthoides Walker, 1867: 119 ; Stål 1870: 31 (syn.); Distant 1900: 63; Schouteden 1907: 19; Kirkaldy 1909: 30.
Bodetria chrysoclora Walker, 1868: 528 ; Stål 1870: 31 (syn.); Distant 1900: 63; Schouteden 1907: 19; Kirkaldy 1909: 30.
Bodetria indecora Walker, 1868: 528 ; Stål 1870: 31 (syn.); Distant 1900: 63; Schouteden 1907: 19; Kirkaldy 1909: 30.
Heteroscelis brenthoides: Schouteden 1907: 19 ; Kirkaldy 1909: 30 (syn.).
Heteroscelis servillei: Distant 1900: 63 ; Schouteden 1907: 19; Pirán 1961: 87; Thomas 1992: 46; Grazia & Schwertner 2011: 713; Grazia et al. 2015: 686; Silva et al. 2018: 404; Lupoli 2019: 80; Cazorla 2021: 10; Castro-Huertas et al. 2022: 9; Roell et al. 2023: 28, 29, 47.
Phyllocheirus brenthoides: Kirkaldy 1909: 30 .
Phyllocheirus servillii: Kirkaldy 1909: 30 ; Pirán, 1961: 87 (syn.).
Heteroscelis zischkai Kormilev, 1951: 40 ; Pirán 1961: 88; Thomas 1992: 46 (syn.).
Heteroscelis dureti Pirán, 1954: 19 ; Thomas 1992: 46 (syn.).
Heteroscelis bergi Pirán, 1954: 20 ; Thomas 1992: 46 (syn.).
Heteroscelis carcavalloi Pirán, 1961: 96 ; Thomas 1992: 46 (syn.).
Heteroscelis amazonica Pirán, 1961: 98 ; Thomas 1992: 46 (syn.).
Types examined
SURINAM. Agerrus remipes Stål, 1859 ; female syntype; labels: “Surinam.”, “Stål”, “ Agerrus remipes Stål. Typ. ”, “111”, “TYPUS”, “NHRS—GULI 000096153”; (NHRS). Photo examined ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
BRAZIL. Heteroscelis amazonica Pirán, 1961 ; female holotype; labels: “Ig do Passarinho Manaus. Am. 24.II.55. Costa Leite e N. Cerqueira—cols. 07. 9/59”, “ Heteroscelis amazonica Pirán 1960 ”, “ HOLOTYPUS ”; (MNRJ) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ).
BRAZIL. Heteroscelis carcavalloi Pirán, 1961 ; female alotype; labels: “Sítio Vieiralves Manaus—Am. 21.Xll.65. Elias e Rappa—cols. 02. 9/59”, “ Heteroscelis carcavalloi Pirán 1960 ”, “ ALLOTYPUS ”; (MNRJ).
BRAZIL. Bodetria brenthoides Walker, 1867 ; female holotype; labels: “Amazon St. Paul / 60 32” “Type”, “ Holotype ”, “1. Bodetria brenthoides ”; “NHMUK 010592390”; (NHMUK). Photo examined ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
BRAZIL. Bodetria chrysoclora Walker, 1868 ; male holotype; labels: “Braz / 62 57” “Type”, “ Holotype ”, “ Bodetria chrysoclora ”; “NHMUK 010592391”; (NHMUK). Photo examined ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
BRAZIL. Bodetria indecora Walker, 1868 ; male holotype; labels: “Braz / 62 57” “Type”, “ Holotype ”, “ Bodetria indecora ”; “NHMUK 010592393”; (NHMUK). Photo examined ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
BOLIVIA. Heteroscelis carcavalloi Pirán, 1961 ; male holotype; labels: “ HOLOTYPUS ”, “Yungas del Palmar. IV–954. A. Martinez.”, “ Heteroscelis carcavalloi Pirán, 1960 .”; (MACN). Photo examined ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
BOLIVIA. Heteroscelis zischkai Kormilev, 1951 ; female alotype; labels: “ BOLIVIA, Region Chaparé, Dep. Cochabamba (400 mtr), 30. VIII. 1951. Dirings.”. Heteroscelis zischkai Kormilev. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. ”. “ ALLOTYPE ”; (MACN) ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ).
PARAGUAY. Heteroscelis dureti Pirán, 1954 ; female holotype; labels: “ Heteroscelis dureti Det. Pirán. 952”, “ HOLOTYPUS ”, “ Paraguay, Villarrica, Schade col. 15.IV.46”; (MACN). Photo examined ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ).
ARGENTINA. Heteroscelis bergi Pirán, 1954 ; male holotype; labels: “Missiones—Argentina. Dep. Concep.— Sta. Maria. M.J. Viana”, “53.484”, “ HOLOTYPUS ”, “ Heteroscelis bergi Det. Pirán. 952”; (MACN). Photo examined ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).
Other material examined. VENEZUELA, Guayana : (Conuco, Rio Moroco), 3 males, 18/ 19.I.1972 G. & E. Scherer ( NMPC); Zulia: (Kasmera, 9.94907, -72.75292), 1 female, 20.IX.1961 F. Fernandez Y. & C. J. Rosales (UFRG); Cx. Panamexicana El Vigia Coloneito: (Km 8.32611, -72.08742), 1 female, 6.I.1955. F. Fernandez Y. & C. J. Rosales (UFRG); Aragua: (El Limón, 10.30589, -67.63212), 1 male, 2.III.1951 F. Fernandes (UFRG); Aragua: (Maracay, 10.23535, -67.59113), 1 female, 2.V.1953 N. Angeles (UFRG). TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: 2 males, XII.1953 G. u. Helga Frey. ( NMPC). BRAZIL, 1 female, 11.IV.1962 Cerq. (UFRG); Pará: (Belém Mocambo, - 1.45583, -48.50444), 1 female, 6.II.1979 P Tadeu (UFRG); (Peixe-boi, -1.10168, -47.27259), 1 male, 12.IV.1977 P Waldir. (UFRG); (Serra Norte Manganês -6.01748, -50.30386), 1 female, 22.X.1984 T. Pimentel; Amazonas: (Manaus, CEPLAC, -2.8905, -59.9576), 1 female, 15.VII.1977 (UFRG); (Serra dos Porcos, 0.416667, -69.366667), 1 male, 25.II.1977 Franklim (INPA); (Manaus, CEPLAC, Am 010 Km 31, -2.8905, -59.9576), 1 male, 7.V.1988 Albuquerque (UFRG); (Manaus, -3.04361, -60.01282), 1 male, 5.V.1976 Paraluppi (UFRG); (Manaus, Br 174 Km 41, Agricultura Geológica -2.6770, -60.04668), 1 male, 15.VI.1981 C.A. Fonseca (INPA); (Itacoatiara, -3.1373, - 58.4418), 1 female, Dirings (MCNZ); Amapá: (Serra do Navio, 1.65803, -52.28195), 1 female, 13.VII.1961 AP. J & B. Bechyné (UFRG); Rio Grande do Norte: (Natal, -5.8101, -35.22674), 1 male, I.1952 M. Alvarenga (UFRG); Pernambuco: (Paudalho, Acerolândia, -7.850, -35.250. 160m), 1 male, II.2016 Grossi & Parizotto (CERPE); (Paudalho, Acerolândia, -7.850, -35.250. 160m), 1 female, XI.2017 Grossi & Parizotto (CERPE); Mato Grosso do Sul: (Bonito, Praia da Figueira -21.2972, -56.5005), 1 female, 01.III.2009 Grossi & Parizotto (DZUP); Rio Grande do Sul: (Cerro Azul -27.7403, -51.5199), 1 female, I.1931 Pe. Buck leg. (MCNZ); ECUADOR, Amazonia: 1 female, II.1998 lgt. Bezdek ( NMPC); Napo: (Tiputini Biodiversity Station, 216m, -0.6379, -76.1495), 1 male, 06.II.1999 T.L. Erwin, et al. (USNM); (Tiputini Biodiversity Station, 216m, -0.6379, -76.1495), 1 female, 22.X.1998 T.L. Erwin, et al. (USNM); PERU, Pucalipa : (Rio Ucayali, -8.4084, -74.6058), 1 female, Dirings (MCNZ); BOLIVIA, Cochabamba (Chapare, 400m -16.80922, -65.71926), 1 female, 07.IX.1951 Dirings (MACN).
Records retrieved from iNaturalist
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, San Juan-Laventille: (10.605137, -61.42763), 14.II.2021.
BRAZIL, Amazonas: (Manaus, -3.095784, -59.989879), 13.VIII.2020.
BRAZIL, Espírito Santo: (S„o Gabriel de Palha, -18.906837, -40.478105), II.2014.
BRAZIL, S„o Paulo: (Campinas, -22.819691, -47.064677), 16.II.2023.
BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro: (Cabo Frio, -22.886901, -42.026649), 8.I.2017.
Diagnosis. Mandibular plates distinctly longer than clypeus, converging apically; head length anterior to the eyes more than 2/3 of the total length of the head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , D); urosternite III tubercle yellow or orange at apex, and surpassing the posterior margin of metasternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , B).
Redescription
BODY: General color ranging from brown and dark red to iridescent hues of green, yellow, blue and purple, with or without yellow spots on the pronotum, scutellum and coria (more commonly observed in non-iridescent specimens).
HEAD: Labium almost reaching the metasternum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , B); proportion of antennomeres: I<II<III ≅ IV ≅ V.
THORAX: Coria longer than scutellum, not reaching the posterior margin of connexival segment VI, uniformly punctured; membrane dark and surpassing posteriorly the abdomen; metapleural evaporatoria surpassing posteriorly the anterior limit of coxae; peritreme reaching or surpassing half the pleural width; apex of peritreme rounded, posterior margin a little more arched than the anterior, both convex ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , E); profemora with rudimentary ante-apical spine; foretibial length on average 3.5x larger than the width of the tibial dorsal expansion ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , F).
ABDOMEN: Posterior angles of urosternites III to VII ending in minute spine, more developed in VII ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , B).
Male:
MEASUREMENTS (n=13): Head length 1.76 ± 0.28 (1.30–1.84); width 1.29 ± 0.07 (1.20–1.50); pronotum length 2.00 ± 0.26 (1.50–2.40); width 4.21 ± 0.26 (3.80–4.50); scutellum length 2.38 ± 0.16 (2.08–2.60); width 2.30 ± 0.13 (2.08–2.56); length of antennomeres: I (n=11) 0.39 ± 0.03 (0.30–0.40), II (n=11) 0.71 ± 0.09 (0.60 –0.90), III (n=11) 0.95 ± 0.10 (0.80–1.04), IV (n=11) 1.03 ± 0.14 (0.72–1.20); V (n=8) 1.09 ± 0.20 (0.72–1.40); length of labiomeres: I (n=8) 0.67 ± 0.08 (0.60–0.80), II (n=8) 0.87 ± 0.07 (0.80–1.00), III (n=8) 0.45 ± 0.07 (0.40–0.60), IV (n=8) 0.68 ± 0.09 (0.60–0.90); width of foretibal expansion (n=10) 0.59 ± 0.07 (0.48–0.72); width of abdomen (n=11) 3.21 ± 0.18 (2.96–3.50); total length 7.04 ± 0.65 (6.10–8.30).
GENITALIA: Pygophore ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ): setae denser on posterolateral angles and on medial portion of dorsal rim; dorsal rim sinuous, medially concave; ventral rim slightly sinuous, medially concave; segment X with surface corrugated and with a membranous longitudinal line; head of parameres lateroventrally directed in posterior view. Phallus ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ): conjunctival dorsal lobe with one pair of long projections and one single forked central projection, ventral lobes with two projections each.
Female:
MEASUREMENTS (n=15): Head length (n=11) 2.06 ± 0.38 (1.40–2.60); width (n=11) 1.47 ± 0.20 (1.20– 1.90); pronotum length (n=13) 2.45 ± 0.26 (1.92–2.80); width (n=13) 4.83 ± 0.42 (3.92–5.60); scutellum length 2.88 ± 0.32 (2.24–3.40); width 2.56 ± 0.40 (1.84–3.00); length of antennomeres: I (n=12) 0.42 ± 0.06 (0.30–0.50), II (n=12) 0.79 ± 0.15 (0.56 –1.10), III (n=12) 1.04 ± 0.21 (0.60–1.30), IV (n=8) 1.22 ± 0.39 (0.80–2.00); V (n=5) 1.03 ± 0.18 (0.96–1.30); length of labiomeres: I (n=9) 0.77 ± 0.11 (0.60–0.90), II (n=9) 1.02 ± 0.16 (0.70–1.30), III (n=9) 0.50 ± 0.10 (0.40–0.70), IV (n=9) 0.85 ± 0.14 (0.60–1.00); width of foretibal expansion (n=11) 0.72 ± 0.09 (0.56–0.90); width of abdomen 3.70 ± 0.33 (3.04–4.30); total length (n=8) 8.28 ± 1.05 (6.88–9.50).
GENITALIA ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ): Valvifers VIII posterior margin bisinuous, slightly projected over the basal angles of laterotergites IX; laterotergites VIII wider than long, with spiracles equidistant from the basal angle and the lateral margin; valvulae IX with 1+1 bean-shaped secondary thickenings; vesicular area half the length of the proximal part of the ductus receptaculi; capsula seminalis oval.
Distribution: Colombia, Ecuador (new record), Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Guyana, Surinam, French Guyana, Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay and Argentina ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Heteroscelis servillii Laporte, 1833
Sampaio, Vinicius Gomes, Roell, Talita & Campos, Luiz Alexandre 2023 |
Heteroscelis brenthoides:
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Heteroscelis servillei:
Thomas, D. B. 1992: 46 |
Piran, A. A. 1961: 87 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Distant, W. L. 1900: 63 |
Bodetria chrysoclora
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Distant, W. L. 1900: 63 |
Stal, C. 1870: 31 |
Walker, F. 1868: 528 |
Bodetria indecora
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Distant, W. L. 1900: 63 |
Stal, C. 1870: 31 |
Walker, F. 1868: 528 |
Bodetria brenthoides
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Distant, W. L. 1900: 63 |
Stal, C. 1870: 31 |
Walker, F. 1867: 119 |
Agerrus remipes Stål, 1859: 434
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Schouteden, H. 1907: 19 |
Stal, C. 1862: 93 |
Stal, C. 1859: 434 |
Phyllochirus servillei:
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Stal, C. 1870: 31 |
Stal, C. 1862: 93 |
Amyot, C. J. B. & Serville, A. 1843: 80 |
Phyllocheirus servillei:
Spinola, M. 1837: 306 |
Heteroscelis servillii
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 30 |
Stal, C. 1870: 31 |
Laporte, F. L. 1833: 86 |