Meloidogyne incognita

Gordon, Kara L, Schrimsher, Drew W & Lawrence, Kathy S, 2022, Additional fertilizer and nematicide combinations on upland cotton to manage Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne incognita in Alabama, Journal of Nematology 54 (1), pp. 1-15 : 11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.21307/jofnem-2022-003

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12191731

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87F3-FFE3-FB76-FCE7-F9F054C32CAD

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Meloidogyne incognita
status

 

Meloidogyne incognita View in CoL microplot evaluation

The combination of a nematicide ST + 28-0-0-5 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB was the most effective treatment in increasing root fresh weight sampled at PHS + FB. The application of 28-0-0-5 at PHS had the lowest M. incognita eggs per gram of root sampled at PHS + FB, followed by a nematicide ST + (NH4)2SO4 + Vydate® + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB. Studies found that plants which had increased nitrogen available had lower nematode population levels ( Miller and Wihrheim, 1966; Rodriguez-Kabana, 1986). Seed cotton yield was greatest with the combination of a nematicide ST + 28-0-0- 5 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB. The combination of a nematicide ST + 28-0-0-5 + Vydate® C-LV + Max-In® Sulfur at PHS and FB also supported the largest root fresh weight among treatments. Similarly, a study conducted by Bednarz et al. (2000) found that cotton yields were greatest using 28-0- 0-5 in a loamy sand soil type. Analyzing nematicide applications individually indicated overall seed cotton yield was increased by 7% with a nematicide ST and 6% with two foliar applications of Vydate® C-LV.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF