Irridiculum, Andrew Hamilton, K. G., 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3768.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B537D07F-E104-4B7A-8FD1-5C383AADB070 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5678089 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B80150-FFDB-3411-FF23-FA41FE875181 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Irridiculum |
status |
gen. nov. |
Irridiculum gen. nov.
Type-species: Irridiculum deformatum sp. nov., the only included species.
Etymology. irridiculum (neuter noun), Latin for “laughing-stock”.
Diagnosis. Immediately recognizable by pointed processes on both the tip of the head and the humeral angles of the thorax. Tylus produced as erect, hornlike process longer than 2 × diameter of eye; frons unicarinate; crown deeply sulcate behind ocelli ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 10 – 16 A); antenna projecting dorsad, pedicel deeply excavated, enclosing short postpedicel, and with prominent ventral “lip” ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 18 – 32 C); basiconic sensillum broadly triangular with single median angle; pronotum strongly arched, humeral angles produced as laterally-directed hornlike processes, tips upturned; scutellum globular, base longer than pronotum, tip a slender spine arising from middle of posterior margin, as long as scutellar base. Tegmina with venation carinate, forming meshwork of irregular cells apically, appendix broad and oblique, extending nearly from wing tip across end of blunt-tipped clavus ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40 – 46 A). Hind wing slender, pointed, with 3 long, apical cells and large, wrinkled appendix ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40 – 46 B). Hind tibia short and stout ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 10 – 16 A), its pecten with 10 black-tipped spines; pecten of basitarsomere with 12 such spines in irregular row; pecten of second tarsomere with 7 such spines. Male unknown. Ovipositor 2nd valvulae leaflike, 1.4 mm long, broad, 3 × as long as wide near base ( Fig. 17B View FIGURES 17 A – R ). Length: 9–10 mm.
Remarks. The shape of the antennal basiconic sensillum appears to be unique. The remarkable body shape appears to combine features of various other genera. For example, the scutellar shape is similar to that of Blastocaena Maa (1963, fig. 26N) with the apical process arising from the middle of the posterior margin; but that genus has a forked basiconic sensillum ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 18 – 32 C) as in Sigmasoma E. Schmidt. Like the latter genus, Irridiculum has a head process and numerous costal cells, and like Maxudea E. Schmidt it has prominent humeral processes. The similarity of the new genus to Maxudea is entirely superficial. The pronotal processes of Maxudea are swept backwards ( Maa 1963, fig. 15A) and the scutellar process arises from a nearly flat scutellum ( Maa 1963, fig. 28A), as in most “Enderleiniinae,” instead of having a bulbous and deeply grooved scutellar base as in other Machaerotini.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Cercopoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |