Mycetophagidae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3826.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C7900FD-656C-4180-80DA-449C310CD2B8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6141930 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787B1-FFF7-FFD1-ACC5-FABEFA10BFE6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mycetophagidae |
status |
|
Key to the world genera of Mycetophagidae View in CoL View at ENA
This key is based primarily on dissected specimens but characteristics of the genera Triphyllopsis Nikitsky (1989, 1993 ) and Pseudotriphyllopsis Nikitsky (1996) were extracted from the literature.
1. Head ( Figs 1C, 1K View FIGURES 1 A – L ) only slightly narrower than greatest pronotal width, more or less abruptly constricted behind eyes to form broad neck and short to moderately long temples ( Figs 7A–B View FIGURES 7 A – H , 8A–B View FIGURES 8 A – H ); pronotum more or less quadrate with very weakly defined lateral carinae, distinctly narrower than combined elytral bases ( Figs 7D View FIGURES 7 A – H , 8D View FIGURES 8 A – H ); male with pair of slender, oblique setose impressions between procoxae and anterior pronotal angles ( Figs 7E View FIGURES 7 A – H , 8E View FIGURES 8 A – H ); antennal club 2-segmented ( Figs 1K View FIGURES 1 A – L , 7C View FIGURES 7 A – H ) OR tarsi 3-3-3 ( Fig. 8C View FIGURES 8 A – H ); length less than 2 mm ......................................................... ... Bergininae ...2
- Head ( Figs 1A–B, 1D–J View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H I –J, 5M–O) distinctly narrower than greatest pronotal width, not abruptly constricted behind eyes; pronotum ( Figs 1A–B, 1D–J View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H M–N) with more distinctly rounded sides and distinct lateral carinae, not or only slightly narrower than combined elytral bases; male without paired ventral prothoracic impressions; antennal club with at least 3 segments ( Figs 1A–B, 1E–F View FIGURES 1 A – L ); tarsi 4-4- 4 in female, 3-4- 4 in male....................................................... 3
2(1) Temples shorter than eye or neck ( Fig. 7B View FIGURES 7 A – H ); antennal club 2-segmented ( Figs 1K View FIGURES 1 A – L , 7C View FIGURES 7 A – H ); tarsi 4-4- 4 in female, 3-4- 4 in male; dorsal surfaces clothed with distinct, thickened setae, usually more or less decumbent ( Figs 1K View FIGURES 1 A – L , 7G View FIGURES 7 A – H ); length more than 1.5 mm; North and Central America, West Indies, southern Europe, Caucasus, India, Sri Lanka, East Indies....... Berginus Erichson View in CoL
- Temples much longer than eye and about as long as neck ( Figs 1C View FIGURES 1 A – L , 8B View FIGURES 8 A – H ); antennal club 3-segmented ( Fig. 8H View FIGURES 8 A – H ); tarsi 3-3- 3 in both sexes; dorsal surfaces clothed with minute, fine setae barely visible at lower magnifications ( Fig. 8D View FIGURES 8 A – H ); lateral edges of each elytron with row of deep pores ( Fig. 8G View FIGURES 8 A – H ); length less than 1.3 mm; Seychelles, Christmas I., Australia Nesolathrus Scott
3(1). Metacoxal length (parallel to long axis of body) more than half its width (perpendicular to long axis of body) ( Fig. 6C View FIGURES 6 A – G ), well-
separated from elytral epipleura; metanepisternum relatively short and broad, its length less than 2.5 times its width; metaventrite distinctly shorter than abdominal ventrite 1; sides of pronotum usually distinctly serrate ( Fig. 6D View FIGURES 6 A – G ); scutellar shield strongly transverse ( Fig. 6E View FIGURES 6 A – G ) or absent; elytral punctures large, nude and distinctly seriate ( Fig. 6G View FIGURES 6 A – G ); pterothorax and abdomen sometimes with large setose cavities ( Figs 6C, 6F View FIGURES 6 A – G ); hind wings usually absent; southern Europe, North Africa Esarcinae ................................................................................................. Esarcus Reiche View in CoL - Metacoxal length (parallel to long axis of body) much less than half its width (perpendicular to long axis of body) ( Figs 9G View FIGURES 9 A – G , 11E View FIGURES 11 A – I , 14H View FIGURES 14 A – H ); large, nude, seriate elytral punctures and setose pterothoracic and abdominal cavities always absent................................................................................................. Mycetophaginae ...4
4(3). Mesepimera not reaching mesocoxal cavities, which are closed laterally by the meeting of mesoventrite and metaventrite ( Figs 13D, 13G View FIGURES 13 A – L , 15A, 15C View FIGURES 15 A – C ).................................................................................. 5
- Mesepimera reaching mesocoxal cavities ( Figs 9F–G View FIGURES 9 A – G , 11E View FIGURES 11 A – I , 12D View FIGURES 12 A – L , 14H View FIGURES 14 A – H )............................................ 8
5(4). Base of pronotum distinctly narrower than combined elytral bases ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H O); antennomeres 9 and 10 about 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomere 11 shorter and narrower than 9 or 10 ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B H, 5O); mesoventrite carinate for most of its length ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3 A – B C); vestiture of moderately long erect and inclined setae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H O); New Zealand...................... Zeclaviger gen. nov.
- Base of pronotum not or barely narrower than combined elytral bases; antennomeres 9 and 10 transverse or only slightly longer than wide; antennomere 11 at least slightly longer than 9 or10; mesoventrite not carinate, sometimes with short anterior linear prosternal rest; vestiture without long, erect setae......................................................... 6
6(5). Elytral vestiture dual, consisting of longer and shorter, inclined or decumbent setae, the longer setae forming about 12 longitudinal rows separated by at least two rows of shorter setae ( Figs 1H View FIGURES 1 A – L , 3A View FIGURES 3 A – B ); apical maxillary palpomere more or less parallel-sided and not wider than subapical one ( Fig. 15B View FIGURES 15 A – C ); shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly greater than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at same point; hind wings well-developed; cosmopolitan ( Fig. 1H View FIGURES 1 A – L ).... Typhaea Stephens View in CoL
- Elytral vestiture single, consisting of inclined or decumbent setae of more or less equal length ( Fig. 2A View FIGURES 2 A – B ); apical maxillary palpomere distinctly wider than subapical one ( Figs 13A–B View FIGURES 13 A – L ); shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities subequal to or less than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at the same point ( Fig. 13D View FIGURES 13 A – L ); hind wings more or less reduced (apical field shortened or absent, medial field reduced, radial cell sometimes absent).......................................... 7
7(6). Pronotum widest near middle; lateral pronotal carinae distinctly serrate; posterior pronotal angles acute; lateral edges of elytra visible from above for most of their lengths; elytral apex obliquely truncate; protarsomere 1 in male distinctly expanded; abdominal ventrite 1 in male with two large patches of setigerous spicules accompanied by glandular openings ( Figs 4C, 4 View FIGURES 4 A – C F); southern Europe, North Africa.......................................................... Typhaeola Ganglbauer
- Pronotum widest well behind middle ( Fig. 2A View FIGURES 2 A – B ); lateral pronotal carinae simple; posterior pronotal angles not acute; lateral edges of elytra not visible from above; elytral apex broadly rounded; protarsomere 1 in male not expanded; abdominal ventrite 1 in male with two slender transverse pore fields ( Figs 4A, 4 View FIGURES 4 A – C D); southern Africa................. Afrotyphaeola gen. nov.
8(4). Antennae gradually expanded apically or with weak club composed of 4 or more antennomeres ( Figs 1D–F View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H J, 9D); elytral punctation seriate, but puncture rows sometimes not clearly visible due to dense interstrial punctation and recumbent setae ( Figs 1D–F View FIGURES 1 A – L ).......................................................................................... 9
- Antennae with distinct 3-segmented club ( Figs 1A–B, 1I –J View FIGURES 1 A – L , 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B F–G, 5I, 5M–N, 14B); punctation seriate or not............ 11
9(8). Frontoclypeal suture somewhat angulate and not deeply impressed; paired basal pronotal impressions absent; posterior pronotal angles more or less embracing elytral bases ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H J); shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly less than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at same point; tibial spurs biserrate; hind wings reduced and strap-like; Juan Fernandez Is......................................................................... Filicivora Leschen & Lawrence
- Frontoclypeal suture deeply impressed and straight or curved ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B E, 9A); paired basal pronotal impressions present ( Figs 1E–F View FIGURES 1 A – L ); shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly greater than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at same point ( Fig. 9G View FIGURES 9 A – G ); tibial spurs simple ( Fig. 9C View FIGURES 9 A – G ); hind wings well-developed................................... 10
10(9). Basal pronotal impressions very small and sometimes indistinct; elytron with sutural stria; antennal club indistinct; eyes rounded; elytra usually unicolorous red or brown ( Fig. 1D View FIGURES 1 A – L ); eastern Palaearctic, Caucasus, North Africa, Japan............................................................................................... Eulagius Motschulsky
- Basal pronotal impressions large and distinct ( Figs 1E–F View FIGURES 1 A – L ); elytra without sutural stria; antennal club usually distinctly 4- to 6- segmented ( Fig. 9D View FIGURES 9 A – G ); eyes elongate-oval, usually slightly emarginate ( Fig. 9A View FIGURES 9 A – G ); elytra usually with dark and light pattern, occasionally black; widely distributed except Australia and New Zealand....................... Mycetophagus Hellwig View in CoL
11(8). Pronotum widest at base, which is as wide as or wider than combined elytral bases ( Figs 1I –J View FIGURES 1 A – L ); posterior pronotal angles more or less embracing elytral humeri ( Figs 11C–D View FIGURES 11 A – I ); pronotal hypomera ( Figs 12F, 12H View FIGURES 12 A – L ) and elytral epipleura ( Fig. 12I View FIGURES 12 A – L ) usually strongly oblique or almost vertical, not visible in lateral view; pronotal disc with pair of elongate, slit-like, basal impressions, usually darkly pigmented ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B C); metaventrite not shorter than first abdominal ventrite ( Fig. 12D View FIGURES 12 A – L ); frontoclypeal suture not deeply impressed, forming a fine curved or angulate line ( Fig. 11A View FIGURES 11 A – I ); scutellar shield widest at base and broadly rounded at apex ( Fig. 12K View FIGURES 12 A – L ); antennal club usually slender, often with antennomeres 9–11 at least slightly elongate ( Fig. 11I View FIGURES 11 A – I ); tibial spurs usually bipectinate and sometimes highly complex ( Figs 11B, 11G View FIGURES 11 A – I –HN, 12B); body more or less flattened, often with complex, dual vestiture ( Figs 11A, 11I View FIGURES 11 A – I , 12A View FIGURES 12 A – L ).................................................................. 12
- Pronotum usually widest anterior to base ( Figs 1G–H, 1L View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H I, 5N); IF pronotum widest at base, THEN posterior pronotal angles not embracing elytral humeri ( Figs 1A View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H M) OR metaventrite distinctly shorter than first abdominal ventrite; base of pronotal disc without or with subcircular paired impressions; frontoclypeal suture usually more deeply impressed; elytral epipleura more or less flattened, often partly visible in lateral view; scutellar shield usually widest behind base and apically truncate ( Figs 10G View FIGURES 10 A – H , 14D View FIGURES 14 A – H ), body usually more convex with simple vestiture........................................... 13
12(11). Outer edge of protibia lined with closely-spaced, spine-like setae; protibial apex with one long bipectinate spur and another much shorter spur ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B I, 12B); apical maxillary palpomere slightly longer than preapical one and strongly obliquely truncate
so that outer edge is acute ( Fig. 12C View FIGURES 12 A – L ); apical labial palpomere as wide as or slightly wider than preapical one and attached at its apex ( Fig. 12C View FIGURES 12 A – L ); elytra with distinct rows of punctures ( Figs 1I View FIGURES 1 A – L , 12J View FIGURES 12 A – L ); Madeira, Japan, Australia.......... Litargops Reitter - Outer edge of protibia lined with finer, less closely spaced setae ( Fig. 11G View FIGURES 11 A – I ); protibial apex with two bipectinate spurs ( Figs 11G–H View FIGURES 11 A – I ); apical maxillary palpomere distinctly longer than preapical one and not strongly, obliquely truncate ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B K); apical labial palpomere distinctly narrower than preapical one and attached subapically ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B J); elytra punctures not forming distinct rows ( Fig. 1J View FIGURES 1 A – L ); widely distributed........................................................ Litargus Erichson View in CoL
13(11). Body about 2.5 times as long as wide ( Fig. 1G View FIGURES 1 A – L ); lateral pronotal carinae dentate ( Figs 10B, 10E View FIGURES 10 A – H ); sides of elytra parallel for most of their lengths; elytral punctation distinctly seriate ( Fig. 10F View FIGURES 10 A – H ); abdominal ventrites 2–4 in male each with a pair of small, circular setose patches near midline ( Fig. 10H View FIGURES 10 A – H ); Chile and Argentina............................ Pseudochrodes Reitter
- Body shorter and broader ( Figs 1A–B, 1L View FIGURES 1 A – L , 5 View FIGURES 5 A – H I, 5M–N); lateral pronotal carinae simple or minutely denticulate ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 3 A – B D, 14E); sides of elytra more or less curved for most of their lengths; elytral punctation seriate or not; abdominal ventrites in male without paired, subcircular setose patches..................................................................... 14
14(13). Elytra with distinct puncture rows....................................................................... 15
- Elytra without distinct puncture rows (occasionally with indistinct or incomplete rows)............................. 16
15(14). Shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly less than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at same point; sides of elytra distinctly converging beyond middle; elytra with short scutellary striole; pronotum at least 0.65 times as long as wide; hind wings absent; abdominal ventrites in male without pore fields; central Asia.............. Triphyllopsis Nikitsky
- Shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly greater than length of abdominal ventrite 1 at same point; sides of elytra more or less parallel, converging only at posterior fourth; elytra without scutellary striole; pronotum less than half as long as wide; hind wings well-developed; abdominal ventrites 1 to 3 in male each with a pair of transversely oriented V- or U-shaped pore fields (as in Fig. 4B View FIGURES 4 A – C ); Japan...................................... Triphyllioides Miyatake
16(14). Posterior pronotal angles at least slightly acute and sometimes embracing elytral bases; basal pronotal foveae absent; shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly less than length of abdominal ventrite 1; scutellar shield strongly transverse; hind wings absent........................................................................... 17
- Posterior pronotal angles right or obtuse, not embracing elytral bases; basal pronotal foveae usually present; shortest distance between mesocoxal and metacoxal cavities distinctly greater than length of abdominal ventrite 1; scutellar shield slightly transverse; hind wings present.............................................................................. 18
17(16). Mesoventrite carinate; posterior pronotal angles not or only slightly embracing elytral bases ( Fig. 1A View FIGURES 1 A – L ); prosternal process extending well beyond procoxae, narrowly rounded at apex; prosternum in male with pubescent fovea (as in Fig. 14E View FIGURES 14 A – H ); abdominal ventrite 1 in male with pair of U-shaped pore fields (as in Figs 4B, 4 View FIGURES 4 A – C E); Caucasus................. Triphyllina Reitter
- Mesoventrite not carinae, with small subtriangular prosternal rest; posterior pronotal angles distinctly embracing elytra; prosternal process not extending beyond procoxae, truncate at apex; prosternum and abdominal ventrite 1 in male simple; China................................................................................ Pseudotriphyllopsis Nikitsky
18(16). Antennomeres 9 and 10 slightly longer than wide and slightly expanded apically with sensory field at apex, 11 distinctly longer than wide and distinctly longer than 9 or 10 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B F); mesoventrite more or less concave, with small anterior subquadrate prosternal rest; vertex in male with pubescent fovea ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B E, 5M); prosternum and abdomen in male simple; southern North America and Central America.......................................................... Neotriphyllus gen. nov.
- Antennomeres 9 and 10 transverse ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B G); mesoventrite with linear or triangular prosternal rest ( Figs 14H View FIGURES 14 A – H , 15 View FIGURES 15 A – C E); vertex in male without pubescent fovea; abdomen in male with pore fields ( Figs 4B, 4 View FIGURES 4 A – C E).................................... 19
19(18). Posterior pronotal angles broadly rounded ( Figs 2B View FIGURES 2 A – B , 15 View FIGURES 15 A – C D); mesoventrite with large triangular prosternal rest occupying most of ventrite ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15 A – C E); abdominal ventrite 1 in male with very slender, curved linear pore fields extending from anterolateral angles to mesal fourth ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15 A – C G); length less than 1.3 mm; North and Central America................. Thrimolus Casey View in CoL
- Posterior pronotal angles not broadly rounded ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 3 A – B D, 14E); mesoventrite with linear or small, triangular prosternal rest ( Fig. 14H View FIGURES 14 A – H ); abdominal ventrite 1 in male with shorter and broader linear or C-shaped pore fields ( Figs 4A–B View FIGURES 4 A – C ); length greater than 1.3 mm; Holarctic and Notogean........................................................................ 20
20(19). Antennomeres 9 and 10 slightly transverse, slightly expanded apically, with sensory fields at apex; anterior edge of mesoventrite with 2 small carinae; prosternum in male without setose fovea; abdominal ventrites 1–4 in male each with pair of Vshaped or linear pore fields; habitus ( Fig. 1L View FIGURES 1 A – L ); Eurasia........................................... Triphyllus Dejean
- Antennomeres 9 and 10 distinctly transverse and widest at middle, with sensory fields often occupying half of antennomere ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B G, 14B); anterior edge of mesoventrite with short linear or narrowly triangular elevation ( Fig. 14H View FIGURES 14 A – H ); prosternum in male with setose fovea ( Fig. 14E View FIGURES 14 A – H ); abdomen with U-shaped or linear pore fields on ventrite 1 only ( Figs 4B, 4 View FIGURES 4 A – C E)............. 21
21(20). Antennomere 11 distinctly narrower than 9 or 10 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 A – B G); prosternal process parallel-sided, slightly emarginate at apex; procoxal cavity without slit-like extension; Eurasia and eastern North America.................... Pseudotriphyllus Reitter View in CoL
- Antennomeres 9–11 of equal width; prosternal process slightly expanded almost to apex, then narrowed and apically truncate ( Fig. 14E View FIGURES 14 A – H ); procoxal cavity with short, curved, slit-like extension ( Fig. 14E View FIGURES 14 A – H ); New Zealand, Madagascar and Chile................................................................................. Nototriphyllus gen. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |