Tephrochlamys Loew, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.2.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DF488D7B-8A2A-41C8-B2FD-C888FB7F32F0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7836560 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B71833-FFF1-FFB3-FF3C-FF61FE39FD89 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tephrochlamys Loew, 1862 |
status |
|
Tephrochlamys Loew, 1862 View in CoL View at ENA
Tephrochlamys Loew, 1862: 128 View in CoL .
Type species: Tephrochlamys rufiventris Meigen, 1830 View in CoL .
Tephrochlamys: Aldrich & Darlington, 1908: 71 View in CoL . Czerny, 1924: 85; 1927: 26. Collin, 1943: 241.
Diagnosis. Humeral bristle present. Three pairs of dorsocentral bristles, but dorsocentral bristle before suture absent. First vein of wing ending at or very near level of anterior crossvein ( Gill, 1962; Wallace, 1947). Middle tibia with a single ventral apical bristle. Tergite and sternite 6 symmetrical, often macrotrichose ( Woźnica & Kirk-Spriggs, 2021). Phallapodeme free, not fused to hypandrium ( Woźnica & Kirk-Spriggs, 2021).
Remarks. This genus is similar to Tephrochlaena , but may be separated from the latter by the dorsocentral bristle present before suture. In Tephrochlaena , the dorsocentral bristle before suture is present ( Papp, 1998; Lo Giudice & Woźnica, 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Tephrochlamys Loew, 1862
Zeng, Wei, Xu, Xingnong & Yang, Ding 2023 |
Tephrochlamys: Aldrich & Darlington, 1908: 71
Collin, J. E. 1943: 241 |
Czerny, L. 1927: 26 |
Czerny, L. 1924: 85 |
Aldrich, J. M. & Darlington, P. S. 1908: 71 |
Tephrochlamys
Loew, H. 1862: 128 |