Rhynostelis Moure and Urban, 1995
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2019-0029 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D06396B-D9E4-48B7-A43E-C845D4C0A145 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B68C5B-FFD9-8A17-FC82-FE399BF9F83B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhynostelis Moure and Urban, 1995 |
status |
|
Rhynostelis Moure and Urban, 1995 View in CoL
( Figs. 1-21 View Figures 1-5 View Figures 6-10 View Figures 11-15 View Figures 16-21 )
Type species: Anthidium multiplicatum Smith, 1879 by original designation.
Rhynostelis View in CoL was described as a monotypic cleptoparasitic genus based on only two females originating from the Amazonas state, in northern Brazil: a female collected by Henry Bates in São Paulo de Olivença and described as male by Smith (1879) under the name Anthidium multiplicatum, and a second female that emerged from a nest of Eufriesea View in CoL built within the walls of a termite nest in Manaus ( Moure and Urban, 1995). Moure and Urban (1995) assumed that the female from Manaus belonged to the same species based on the manuscript note made by Moure of the type specimen of R. multiplicata View in CoL and most likely on Moure’s own recollection of the specimen. After examining photographs of the type specimen deposited in the NHMUK ( Figs.16-21 View Figures 16-21 ), we concluded that the two females interpreted as Rhynostelis multiplicata View in CoL by Moure and Urban (1995) actually correspond to two distinct species. Additionally, we recognize here a third new species of the genus from Panamá. The three species have similar color pattern and can be easily distinguished mainly by details of structure of the female mandible, clypeus and supraclypeal area.
The species of Rhynostelis View in CoL can be recognized by the combination of a carinate frons; juxtantennal carina present; strong paraocular carina; pronotal lobe with short lamina; omaulus lamellate, almost extending ventrally; bigibbous scutum and scutellum; scutoscutellar suture broad and forming two foveae; fore and mid tibiae with one midapical spine on outer surface; hind tibia with flat apical projection on outer surface (more developed in females); arolia present; base of propodeum with irregular foveae. In addition, the females exhibit a tubercle or projection on the supraclypeal area; mandibles with raised condylar carina and a strong antero-basal projection.
Key to females of Rhynostelis View in CoL (only the male of R. plesiognatha View in CoL sp. nov. is known)
1. Mandible with bifurcated condylar carina; axillae rounded; scutellum with shallow posterior emargination ( Fig. 8 View Figures 6-10 ); tergal pilosity brown to black ( Figs. 9 View Figures 6-10 and 14 View Figures 11-15 ); disc of T2 with larger and deeper punctures on its basal third ……………………………………………….2
1’. Mandible with simple condylar carina; axillae somewhat triangular; scutellum with strong posterior emargination ( Fig. 3 View Figures 1-5 ); tergal pilosity yellowish ferruginous ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1-5 ); disc of T2 with shallow punctures throughout.......................... Rhynostelis chrysogaster View in CoL sp. nov.
2. Supraclypeal area not raised, except for the medial carina; clypeus with a small medial tubercle on its upper margin; mandible with a short truncate projection near anterior articulation ( Figs. 6 and 7 View Figures 6-10 ) ..... ..................................................................... Rhynostelis plesiognatha View in CoL sp. nov.
2’. Supraclypeal area and upper margin of clypeus with a large beak-shaped protuberance; mandible with a large horn-shaped projection near anterior articulation ( Figs. 11 and 12 View Figures 11-15 )............................... ...................................................................................... Rhynostelis multiplicata View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Rhynostelis Moure and Urban, 1995
Parizotto, Daniele R. & Melo, Gabriel A. R. 2020 |
Rhynostelis
Moure and Urban and Melostelis Urban 1995 |
Rhynostelis
Moure and Urban and Melostelis Urban 1995 |
Eufriesea
Cockerell 1908 |