Paradoris, BERGH, 1884

Valdés, Ángel, 2002, A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136 (4), pp. 535-636 : 592-599

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00039.x

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B5879A-756E-6C01-93E8-F95126C2AA51

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Paradoris
status

 

GENUS PARADORIS BERGH, 1884 View in CoL

Paradoris Bergh, 1884a: 686 View in CoL . Type species: Paradoris granulata Bergh, 1884 View in CoL , by monotypy.

Percunas Marcus, 1970: 945 View in CoL . Type species: Percunas mulciber Ev. Marcus, 1970 View in CoL ; by original designation. Diagnosis

Dorsum covered with simple tubercles, stiffened by integumentary spicules. Head with two conical oral tentacles. Anterior border of the foot grooved and notched. Labial armature with rodlets. Radula composed of simple, hamate teeth, with a short, strong cusp. Reproductive system with a flattened, granular prostate, having two well differentiated regions. Penis and vagina devoid of hooks. Accessory glands and sacs armed with copulatory spines are normally present.

Remarks

Bergh (1884a) described the genus Paradoris based on Paradoris granulata Bergh, 1884 , as being a ‘typical dorid’ characterized by having the jaws divided into three portions, several accessory glands and several sacs with copulatory spines. According to Bergh (1884a) the relationships of Paradoris are uncertain, and this genus is probably close to the archidorids, from which it differs by having jaws.

Marcus (1970) described Percunas based on Percunas mulciber Marcus, 1970 as having the labial cuticle divided into four areas with rodlets, all radular teeth hook-shaped, massive prostate, several darts in the muscular diverticula and multiple glands annexed to the penial papilla. Baba (1989), Miller (1995), and Ortea (1995) recognized that Percunas is a synonym of Paradoris .

Perrone (1990) transferred Discodoris indecora Bergh, 1881 to the genus Paradoris , without any justification, and Ortea (1995) regarded P. indecora as a synonym of P. granulata . The type material of P. indecora is lost, but in the original description there is enough information to recognize it as a synonym of P. granulata .

Miller (1995) and Ortea (1995) found some variability in Paradoris when describing new species, and modified the diagnosis of the genus to accommodate these new species. According to these authors some species, such as Paradoris leuca Miller, 1995 and Paradoris ceneris Ortea, 1995 , lack both accessory glands and copulatory spines, whereas Paradoris mollis Ortea, 1995 has copulatory spines but lacks accessory glands.

PARADORIS INDECORA ( BERGH, 1881) View in CoL

( FIGS 34A View Figure 34 , 35 View Figure 35 , 36 View Figure 36 )

Discodoris indecora Bergh, 1881: 108–112 View in CoL , pl. J, figs 26–33, pl. K, figs 11–19.

Paradoris granulata Bergh, 1884a: 686–691 View in CoL , pl. 76, figs 10–24.

Paradoris granulata View in CoL var. Bergh, 1884a: 691–693, pl. 77, figs 25–32.

Type material

Discodoris indecora Bergh. The original type material, collected from Trieste , Italy, is lost. Paradoris granulata Bergh, 1884 . LECTOTYPE (here selected): Trieste, Italy, April–May 1979 – 80, 24 mm preserved length, leg. Graeffe ( ZMUC GAS-2120 ); PARALEC TOTYPES: Trieste, Italy, April–May 1979 –80, six specimens, 8–24 mm preserved length, leg. Graeffe ( ZMUC).

Two other specimens labelled as Paradoris granulata var. belong to the same species. They were probably collected from Trieste, Italy, April–May 1979 –80, 11– 19 mm preserved length, leg. Graeffe ( ZMUC GAS- 2121).

Additional material

Cabo de Palos , Murcia, Spain, 4 August 1984, one specimen, 14 mm preserved length, leg. J. Templado ( MNCN 15.05 About MNCN /18231) .

External morphology

The general colour of the living animals is uniformly pale grey with a pale brown tinge in the centre of the dorsum ( Fig. 34A View Figure 34 ). There are several dark brown spots on the tips of the larger tubercles, also associated with groups of small opaque white dots. The rhinophores are dark brown with the apex and some spots opaque white. The gill is pale grey with the apices of the leaves bright yellow and dark brown. The whole dorsum is covered with small, rounded tubercles ( Fig. 35E View Figure 35 ). The largest tubercles occur in two lines running from the rhinophores to the gill. The rhinophoral and branchial sheaths have tubercles no different from those on the rest of the dorsum. There are eight tripinnate branchial leaves, forming a circle. The anal papilla is situated in the centre of the branchial circle of leaves. The rhinophores are elongate, having 14 lamellae in a 24-mm preserved length specimen.

Ventrally there are two long and conical oral tentacles ( Fig. 36E View Figure 36 ). The tentacles are grooved longitudinally. The anterior border of the foot is grooved and notched.

Anatomy

The posterior end of the glandular portion of the oral tube has six strong retractor muscles ( Fig. 36C View Figure 36 ) which attach to the body wall. The oval, muscular buccal bulb has two additional muscles attached; two long and thin salivary glands connect with it at each side of the oesophageal junction. The buccal bulb is half the length of the glandular portion of the oral tube. The labial cuticle has two areas covered with a number of simple rodlets ( Fig. 35D View Figure 35 ). The radular formula is 20 ¥ 22.0. 22 in a 24-mm long specimen. Rachidian teeth are absent. The lateral teeth are narrow and elongate, having a single cusp and lacking denticles ( Fig. 35A View Figure 35 ). The teeth from the middle portion of the half-row are larger than those closer to the medial portion of the radula, and they have a short and strong cusp compared to the base ( Fig. 35B View Figure 35 ). The outermost teeth are smaller and also lack denticles ( Fig. 35C View Figure 35 ). Some of them completely lack a cusp. The oesophagus is long and connects directly to the stomach ( Fig. 36A View Figure 36 ).

The ampulla is very long and convoluted ( Fig. 36C View Figure 36 ). It branches into a short oviduct and the prostate. The oviduct enters the female gland mass near to its centre. The prostate is tubular and has two portions distinguishable by their colour and texture ( Fig. 36B View Figure 36 ). It connects with a long duct that narrows and expands again into the large ejaculatory portion of the deferent duct. The muscular deferent duct opens into a short common atrium with the vagina. Connected to the atrium there us a large, ramified accessory gland and two muscular sacs each containing a rigid spine. The vagina is long and thin. At its proximal end it joins the bursa copulatrix. From the bursa copulatrix leads another duct connecting to the uterine duct and the seminal receptacle. The bursa copulatrix is oval in shape, about four times as large as the seminal receptacle ( Fig. 36B View Figure 36 ).

In the central nervous system ( Fig. 36D View Figure 36 ) the cerebral and pleural ganglia are fused and distinct from the pedal ganglia. There are three cerebral nerves leading from each cerebral ganglion and three pleural nerves leading from each pleural ganglion. There is a separate abdominal ganglion on the right side of the visceral loop. The buccal ganglia are near to the rest of the central nervous system, joined to the cerebral ganglia by two relatively short nerves. Gastrooesophageal, rhinophoral and optical ganglia are present. The pedal ganglia are clearly separated, having two nerves each one. The pedal and parapedal commissures are enveloped together with the visceral loop.

The circulatory system ( Fig. 36A View Figure 36 ) consists of a large heart and a two blood glands situated in front of and behind the central nervous system.

Remarks

Ortea (1995) revised the Atlantic species of Paradoris and concluded that Paradoris granulata Bergh, 1884 , the type species of the genus, is a junior synonym of Discodoris indecora Bergh, 1881 . The material from the Mediterranean examined here is identical to Ortea’s (1995) redescription of this species. He also described more new species from the area that appear to be distinct in several anatomical details.

ZMUC

Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Nudibranchia

Family

Discodorididae

Loc

Paradoris

Valdés, Ángel 2002
2002
Loc

Paradoris

Bergh R 1884: 686
1884
Loc

Paradoris granulata

Bergh R 1884: 691
1884
Loc

Paradoris granulata

Bergh R 1884: 691
1884
Loc

Discodoris indecora Bergh, 1881: 108–112

Bergh R 1881: 112
1881
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF