Miridiba huesiotoi Li & Yang, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.749.1355 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25FD5744-861D-45E4-B6AD-350716AA29BF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770324 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B56743-A628-0634-FDBF-FA78FE9EE6C5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Miridiba huesiotoi Li & Yang, 2015 |
status |
|
Miridiba huesiotoi Li & Yang, 2015
Miridiba huesiotoi Li & Yang in Li et al., 2015: 524 View Cited Treatment (type loc.: Green Island, Taiwan, China).
Miridiba huesiotoi – Bezděk 2016: 271 (catalogue). — Gao et al. 2018: 13 View Cited Treatment (catalogue); 2019: 461 (species list; in key).
Diagnosis
See Li et al. (2015).
Remarks
Miridiba huesiotoi was described based on the male holotype and eleven paratypes (5 males and 6 females) ( Li et al. 2015). According to the original description, M. huesiotoi can be separated from M. formosana by having pubescence on pronotum, elytra and scutellum hardly observable; apex of clypeus moderately bilobed; anterior angles slightly protuberant; metafemora slender, slightly broadened at middle; parameres with upper part curved downwardly, exceeding the end of the ventral branches extremely. In our opinion, features at the external morphology are not discrete enough to differentiate M. huesiotoi from M. formosana . 1) Setae on body distinctly short / distinctly long. 2) The apex of clypeus moderately bilobed / weakly bilobed. 3) Anterior angles of pronotum slightly protuberant / moderately protuberant. 4) Metafemora slender, slightly broadened at middle / expanded anteriorly and posteriorly. 5) Parameres with upper part curved / strongly curved. These differences found by Li et al. (2015) could be due to intraspecific variability of M. formosana . However, given that we were unable to examine the types of M. huesiotoi to study the variability of these characters or to compare them with the type of M. formosana ; M. huesiotoi is considered a valid species until further investigation is done. Based on the 9-segmented antennae and the parameres described by Li et al. (2015), this species is included in this genital morphotype I “ Trichophora ”.
Distribution
China (Taiwan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Miridiba huesiotoi Li & Yang, 2015
Gao, Chuan-bu & Coca-Abia, María Milagro 2021 |