Myosotis elongata var. parviflora Strobl
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4081/nhs.2015.248 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B53071-5E23-ED26-E87A-443DFC22B68D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Myosotis elongata var. parviflora Strobl |
status |
s.l. |
Myosotis elongata var. parviflora Strobl View in CoL in Flora 67: 635. 1884. [ Myosotis sylvatica s.l.]
Locus classicus: [ Italy, Sicily] “ Colma Grande [...] Bosco di Castelbuono [...] Waldwiesen und Buschwelrk der Nebroden, Fosse di S. Gandolfo, Pizzo �ntenna [...] Pietra Fucile, Balato reale, Piano della battaglia, Pozzo di Mennonica (Porcari Cat.)” .
Lectotype (here designated): [ Italy, Sicily] “ In re- gione elatiore montium Madoniarum locis umbrosis, solo calcareo: Fosse di S. Gandolfo 1850 m ”, 07.1873, Strobl (� DMONT!).
Other original specimens mentioned by Strobl are kept in FI, NAP, PAL and possibly in other herbaria (not seen).
Note. When describing the new taxon M. sylvatica subsp. subarvensis, Grau (1964: 571-572) suggested that this could be a synonym of M. elongata var. parviflora and other doubtful names of taxa described from Sicily and the South Balkans. However, the author also added that “eine Typifizierung kaum möglieh ist” [“a typification is hardly possible”] for all these names. Both the collection locality and the morphological characters of the type material of M. elongata found in ADMONT support Grau’s hypothesis that M. sylvatica subsp. subarvensis corresponds to M. elongata var. parviflora .
Although M. sylvatica subsp. elongata View in CoL and subsp. subarvensis View in CoL , as well as other infraspecific taxa, are rec- ognized in most recent floristic treatments based on weak quantitative differences (Grau & Merxmüller in Tutin & al. 1972, Pignatti 1982, Greuter & al. 1984), their taxonomic (and geographic) separation is very doubtful. For example, two specimens collected by Todaro at Busambra in the same day have been identified by Grau one as M. sylvatica subsp. subarvensis View in CoL and the other (the isotype!) as M. sylvatica subsp. elongata View in CoL , which would suggest the hardly plausible co-existence of two conspecific taxa in the same area and habitat.
Morphological variation of the Myosotis sylvatica View in CoL group in Italy needs to be better investigated and it may be that some of the taxa currently accepted are not worthy of recognition.
Sabato S., 1990 – Remarks on the Publication Dates of Tenore’s “Flora Napolitana”. Taxon, 39 (3): 409- 416.
Selvi F., Cecchi L., 2009 – Typification of names taxa of Boraginaceae described by Italian botanists. Taxon, 58: 621-626.
Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.�. (eds.), 1972 – Flora Europaea, 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
S |
Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Myosotis elongata var. parviflora Strobl
Cecchi, Lorenzo & Selvi, Federico 2015 |
Myosotis elongata var. parviflora
Strobl 1884: 635 |