Simulium (Hellichiella) congareenarum (Dyar & Shannon, 1927)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4442.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6162E13B-C61B-4476-8507-4B79FDEED9CB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6485552 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487FA-C24C-5265-FF44-8480CCE4FD4A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Simulium (Hellichiella) congareenarum |
status |
|
Simulium (Hellichiella) congareenarum View in CoL species group
Simulium (Hellichiella) latipes (Meigen, 1804)
Tunisia: Clergue-Gazeau & Boumaiza (1986: 605–606, 608, 610, 612, 618–619): dichotomous key, illustration of larval hypostoma (as S. yerburyi ). Clergue-Gazeau et al. (1991: 54): listed but locality unspecified. Adler & Crosskey (2018: 52): inventoried but legitimacy of record questioned. Jendouba Province: Bailly- Choumara et al. (1971: 379, 381): brief description of breeding site (as S. latipes and S. yerburyi ).
Comment: We suspect that records of S. latipes (including S. yerburyi ) for North Africa (Tunisia) are based on misidentifications of the S. vernum complex. All Tunisian references to S. latipes (or S. yerburui ) probably trace to the specimens (two?) collected by Bailly-Choumara et al. (1971), which were almost certainly of the S. vernum complex. This was the rationale of Adler & Crosskey (2018) for questioning the records. We note that the illustration and identification key provided by Clergue-Gazeau & Boumaiza (1986) actually pertain to S. latipes (as S. yerburyi ), although the provenance of the specimens used for illustration is not known.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Hellichiella |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Hellichiella |