Abrocoma schistacea Thomas, 1921
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mspecies |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2290CAA5-B986-4C69-9B14-241BC11FAB98 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B087CB-8456-963C-FF7D-F942FBAD754C |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Abrocoma schistacea Thomas, 1921 |
status |
|
Abrocoma schistacea Thomas, 1921
Sierra del Tontal Chinchilla Rat
Abrocoma schistacea Thomas, 1921:216 . Type locality “Los Sombreros, Sierra Tontal, Alt. 2700m,” San Juan Province, Argentina.
Abrocoma cinerea schistacea: Ellerman, 1940:155 . Name combination.
CONTEXT AND CONTENT. Context same as genus. Abrocoma schistacea is monotypic (Braun and Mares 2002). A. cinerea View in CoL , A. budini View in CoL , A. famatina View in CoL , A. schistacea , A. uspallata View in CoL , and A. vaccarum View in CoL comprise the cinerea View in CoL complex ( Patton et al. 2015).
NOMENCLATURAL NOTES. The holotype specimen (BMNH [British Museum of Natural History] specimen 21.6.21.11; skin and skull; adult female) was obtained by E. Budin, field number 1296, on 29 January 1921 (Braun and Mares 2002). Abrocoma schistacea was considered a subspecies of A. cinerea by Ellerman (1940), and Braun and Mares (2002) recognized it as a distinct morphospecies based on size. A. schistacea has a greater total length, tail length, and hind foot length than A. cinerea (Braun and Mares 2002) . A. schistacea is also commonly called Sanjuanina chinchilla rat.
DIAGNOSIS
Abrocoma schistacea is distinguished from other species of chinchilla rats that occur in its general distribution range because it is restricted to southern San Juan Province and by a combination of characters including size, pelage coloration, and morphological characters (Braun and Mares 2002; Taraborelli et al. 2011). A. schistacea lacks the drab throat patch that is present in A. budini (Catamarqueña chinchilla rat) and A. famatina (Famatina chinchilla rat— Thomas 1921). Here, we present a rudimentary key developed for differentiating the species most likely to be confused with A. schistacea .
1. Body size large, total length> 300 mm; head and body length> 190 mm; tail length> 120 mm; skull length> 48 mm ....... Abrocoma budini (Budini’s chinchilla rat) Body size medium, total length <300 mm; head and body length <190 mm; tail length <120 mm; skull length <48 mm ...2
2. Tail length <50% of head and body length; tail length <30% of total length. Interorbital breadth> 7 mm and length of diastema 13.9 ± 1.1 mm ......................................... Abrocoma cinerea (Jujeña chinchilla rat) Tail length> 50% of head and body length; tail length> 30% of total length. Interorbital breadth <7 mm and length of diastema <13.9 mm ............................ 3
3. Tail length <90 mm. White to very pale orange incisors......... Abrocoma vaccarum (Mendocina chinchilla rat) Tail length> 90 mm. Orange incisors................. 4
4. Incisors are large and orthodont; molariform teeth appear broad. Hypoflexus appears to have a slightly narrower breadth. Mean condylobasal length is 45.4 ± 2.4 mm; and length of maxillary toothrow> 9.6 mm .................. Abrocoma schistacea (Sierra del Tontal chinchilla rat) Incisors are small, narrow, short, and opisthodont; molariform teeth do not appear unusually broad. Hypoflexus appears to have a wide breadth. Mean condylobasal length <44 mm; and length of maxillary toothrow <9.6 mm .. 5
5. Pre-Andean foothills species; inhabiting an altitudinal range of 1,800 –2,000 m ........................................ Abrocoma uspallata (Uspallata chinchilla rat) Andean foothills species; inhabiting an altitude> 3,500 m .......... Abrocoma famatina (Famatina chinchilla rat)
GENERAL CHARACTERS
Abrocoma schistacea (Fig. 1) is a saxicolous species, with a medium-sized body (mean mass ± SE = 174.11 ± 10.12 g, n = 9— Taraborelli et al. 2011). Dorsal coloration of A. schistacea is grayish drab, slightly darker along the midline. Hairs of venter are grayish basally for most of their length; venter similar to, but paler than, dorsum. Dorsal surface of tail is similar to the midline of the dorsum; tail is white below. Whitish hairs surround the perianal region. Forefeet and hind feet are covered with whitish hairs. Sternal gland is covered with hairs that are white to their bases, and it appears as a distinct patch on venter (Braun and Mares 2002; Taraborelli et al. 2011).
Mean measurements (mm ± SE) from Taraborelli et al. (2011) and Braun and Mares (2002), respectively, for mixed sexes of A. schistacea were: total length 263.56 ± 4.11 (n = 9), 290.4 ± 21.2 (n = 8); head and body length 161.56± 2.06 (n = 9), 182.9 ± 14.1 (n = 8); tail length 101.3 ± 2.58 (n = 10), 107.5 ± 9.8 (n = 8); hind foot length 27.91 ± 0.64 (n = 10), 27.9 ± 1.7 (n = 8); ear length 25.60 ± 1.21 (n = 10), 24.6 ± 1.5 (n = 8). Mean ratio of tail length to head and body length is 63.14 ± 1.60% and that of tail length to total length is 38.64 ± 0.61% (n = 9— Taraborelli et al. 2011).
Mean cranial measurements (mm ± SE —Braun and Mares 2002) for mixed sexes of A. schistacea were: zygomatic breadth 22.9 ± 1.3 (n = 12), breadth of braincase 18.6 ± 1.1 (n = 12), palatilar length 20.6 ± 1.7 (n = 12), width of bullae 12 ± 0.6 (n = 4), and length of mandible 33.3 ± 2.3 (n = 4). Nasals are slightly wider at midlength and taper posteriorly. Dorsal edge of zygoma is slanted outward, so that medial edge is easily visible in dorsal view and anterior ascending maxillary portion of zygoma is thin. Zygomatic arches are expanded. Frontals are noticeably constricted. Mastoid islands are of medium size (<23% but> 20% of mastoid breadth). Posterior border of palate is rounded. Mesopterygoid fossae are wide. Bullae are slightly inflated (Braun and Mares 2002; Fig. 2 View Fig ).
DISTRIBUTION
Members of the family Abrocomidae are endemic to South America and are distributed from southern Peru across the northwestern tip of Chile southward to central Argentina (Mares and Ojeda 1982; Braun and Mares 2002; Fig. 3 View Fig ). Within the genus Abrocoma , A. bennettii is restricted to the western slopes of the Andes in Chile (Braun and Mares 1996), A. boliviensis is found only in Bolivia, and the remaining species occur in Argentina. Thomas (1921) restricted the distribution of A. schistacea to southern San Juan Province at Sierra Tontal in Leoncito National Park (2,700 m) and at Pedernal (1,200 m), sites separated by a distance of 51 km. Patton et al. (2015) indicates that it occurs at an elevation range of 1,100 –2,900 m. Glanz and Anderson (1990) confirmed the presence of this species at Sierra Tontal. Taraborelli et al. (2011) recorded A. schistacea at Sierra de La Usina y Majaditas in Leoncito National Park, 15 km from Sierra Tontal, at 13 gulches between 2,115 and 2,884 m, and in latitudinal ranges of 31°45 ′ 24.3 ″ – 31°57 ′ 4 ″ S and 69°13 ′ 28.5 ″ – 69°22 ′ 44.4 ″ W. In the Sierras of southwestern San Juan Province, the climate is cold and dry, with broad temperature fluctuations between daytime and nightime as well as seasonal temperature fluctuations The function of the posterior tooth seems to be food manipulation in the mouth (Braun and Mares 1996). Both teeth form a barrier to the forward movement of food in the mouth. This structure was not found in any of the skeletal specimens examined by Braun and Mares (1996) or by us, indicating that it is not preserved in skulls that have been cleaned. There is no information about these false teeth in other species of Abrocoma .
Abrocoma schistacea is adapted for a saxicolous existence. Some of its specializations are padded feet with leathery tubercles on the pads and claws reduced in size and length ( Taraborelli et al. 2011). These footpads assist in traction on rock surfaces and protect the feet against impacts (Mares and Lacher 1987).
(mean annual temperature ± SE = 14.55 ± 5.65°C). Predominant winds are dry and warm from the northwest (ranging in velocity between 20 and 30 km /h at midday). Precipitation is in the form of snow or hail in winter (reaching 75 mm), and rainfall in summer is about 25mm (Le Houérou 1999; Le Houérou et al. 1999; Márquez 1999). No fossils of A. schistacea are known.
FORM AND FUNCTION
Dental formula of Abrocoma schistacea is i 1/1, c 0/0, p 1/1, m 3/3, total 20. Incisors are broad, large, and orthodont ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Molariform teeth appear broad and hypoflexus appears to have a slightly narrower breadth (Braun and Mares 2002).
We recorded buccal epidermal denticles, or false teeth, in the midline of the mouth and a tongue with a horny pad in A. schistacea . Braun and Mares (1996) noted these false teeth in A. vaccarum . The larger, anteriorly positioned tooth appears to be bilobed and directed posteriorly. These false teeth are not preserved with the skull or other skeletal material but appear to be epidermally derived denticles that function as additional midline teeth (Braun and Mares 1996). The function of the anterior tooth seems to be to maintain food items on the tongue and push them forward against the rough palatal ridges and molariform teeth.
ONTOGENY AND REPRODUCTION
Abrocoma schistacea lives in social groups of 3–4 individuals, 1 male and 2 females or 2 males and 2 females (n = 3 groups— Taraborelli et al. 2011). No sexual dimorphism was detected by Taraborelli et al. (2011), who calculated a male body mass/female body mass of 1.03. A. schistacea could possess a polygynous mating system like other saxicolous rodents (Mares and Lacher 1987), but more studies are needed to determine the mating system in this specie and in the genus Abrocoma .
Other hystricognath rodents give birth to precocial young after a long gestation period. In captivity the gestation period of A. cinerea is 116 days, litter size averages 2.2 (range 1–3), and neonates weigh 22 g ( Kleiman et al. 1979). Female A. bennettii give birth twice a year to litters that range from 1 to 6 ( Mann 1978). These data are unknown for A. schistacea .
ECOLOGY
Fresh feces of Abrocoma schistacea are blackish brown and shiny, and deposited in latrines, which are black or reddish, and may have a crystalline appearance from urine. These deposits have a strong odor and can be used to locate individuals and social groups. Groups defecate on piles of boulders, and massive latrines could correspond to a social group or to a few individuals, suggesting long time use and fidelity to particular crevices ( Taraborelli et al. 2011). Crevices inhabited by A. schistacea are located within walls of flagstones or piles of massive stone blocks. From our observations we think that the rocks provide the only reliable refuge from both predators and the deep winter cold and also serve as lookout posts for predator detection. The crevices used by A. schistacea are on the east hillsides, receiving sunlight in the morning. The orientation of burrow holes was most frequently northeasterly-easterly (mean angle of orientation 81°30 ′ ± 0°05 ′ — Taraborelli et al. 2011). Mean values (± SE) for burrow features were: number of holes per burrow, 5.4± 0.5; diameter of burrow crevice, 8.4± 0.9 cm; depth of galleries, 29.5 ± 3.5cm; height of burrow crevice from foot of hill, 5.8± 0.5 m; distance between burrows 127.4 ± 49.9 m; and distance from burrow to nearest vegetation, 3.7± 0.4 m. Plant species nearest to the burrows were shrubs such as Gymnophyton (yerba agria) and Larrea (jarilla— Taraborelli et al. 2011).
Abrocoma schistacea occurs in the piedmont habitat of the Monte desert biome, with typical desert shrubs, various cacti and herbs (Braun and Mares 2002). At El Leoncito, vegetative sampling ( Taraborelli et al. 2011) revealed total plant cover of 23.31 ± 1.81% (SE). Plant cover was lower in summer (January 2007, 14.92 ± 2.83%) than in autumn (April 2006; 27.62 ± 2.85%) and spring (October 2006; 28.42 ± 3.42%). Species richness was higher in autumn (15 plant species) with more herbs than in other seasons of the year; richness was 10 species in spring and 11 in summer. In the areas inhabited by A. schistacea , plants classified as shrubs provided more ground cover (15.8 ± 1.26%) in relation to herbs (5.41 ± 0.66%) and cacti (1.25 ± 0.75%). The dominant vegetation comprised Gymnophyton polycephalim (Umbelliferae; 27.6%), Larrea nitida and L. divaricata ( Zygophyllaceae ; 20.7%— Taraborelli et al. 2011).
Abrocoma schistacea is herbivorous, with the frequency of creosotebush, Larrea divaricata and L. nitida , in the diet exceeding 80% during the summer and autumn seasons, which would classify A. schistacea as a creosotebush specialist. The ability to digest creosotebush, with its many tannins and resins ( Mabry et al. 1977), is rare among mammals. Gymnophyton , Stipa (Gramminea) , and Bougainvillea (Nyctaginaceae) appear to be avoided in the diet by this species. For A. schistacea , diversity in food availability was greater in autumn than in summer (Ha ′ = 2.955; Hs ′ = 2.245) and trophic niche breadth was narrower in autumn (0.29 ± 0.01 PSa; 0.61 ± 0.01 PSs), and the opposite occurred in summer ( Taraborelli et al. 2011). In regard to seasonal variations within El Leoncito, our data concur with those expected from theory of Feinsinger et al. (1981), when the availability of resources is low, the width and the breadth of the trophic niche is bigger than with high availability of resources.
Taraborelli et al. (2011) recorded 15 footprints and 2 tail prints of A. schistacea very early in the morning in a sand footprint trap. Therefore, this species is potentially diurnal, with activity early in the morning. A. cinerea , the most researched species, is nocturnal (Glanz and Anderson 1990); A. schistacea is nocturnal and crepuscular, if not occasionally diurnal (Braun and Mares 1996).
CONSERVATION
Abrocoma schistacea has no direct threats. However, future scenarios of climate change could be potential threats for this species because it is a specialist that inhabits only the pre- Andean foothills of southern San Juan Province ( Argentina). The Administration of National Parks of Argentina gives special value to A. schistacea because this species is endemic to the region where El Leoncito National Park is located. This species has been categorized as “Low Concern” ( Ojeda 2012), but it is currently listed as “Data Deficient” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 2015). Concerning rarity, A. schistacea has low numbers of individuals (0.15 individuals per hectare— Taraborelli et al. 2011), restricted distributional range, and high degree of specialization. Protection of its populations should be taking place because of its low abundance, restricted and patchy distribution, and high degree of specialization.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Abrocoma schistacea Thomas, 1921
Taraborelli, Paula A., Sassi, Paola L., Dacar, MARíA A., Moreno, Pablo & Ojeda Abstract, Ricardo A. 2015 |
Abrocoma cinerea schistacea:
ELLERMAN, J 1940: 155 |
Abrocoma schistacea
THOMAS, O 1921: 216 |