Prosoponoides minutus, Irfan & Zhang & Peng, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.8.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7526742 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87CE-BDB4-FF7B-FF2E-3D9FFC50F8C7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prosoponoides minutus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Prosoponoides minutus sp. nov. (ḿAEƦ)
Figures 270–273 View FIGURE 270 View FIGURE 271 View FIGURE 272 View FIGURE 273 , 286 View FIGURE 286 .
Types. Holotype ♂, CHINA, Yunnan, Gongshan County, Qiqi Dongshaofang , 27.69521ºN, 98.48514ºE, 3208m, 29 September 2007, Xian-jin Peng leg. (20070929) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 7♂ 3♀, same data as holotype male (20070929); GoogleMaps 2♂ 1♀, Gongshan County, Dabadi to Yakou , along the tunnel, 27.7898889°N, 98.4510278°E –27.7961944°N, 98.4545278°E, 2984m, 02 October 2002, Heng-mei Yan leg. (Yan 021002); GoogleMaps 2♂, Fugong County , 18km, Lumadeng, Yama river bridge, 25.13561°N, 98.84166°E, alt. 1612m, 7 October 2007, Xian-jin Peng leg. (20071007); GoogleMaps 1♂, Gongshan County , Bingzhongluo Township, Gemalaka, 27.98139ºN, 98.48134ºE, 4000m, 20 August 2006, Peng Hu leg. (Hu 060820) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Gongshan County, Bingzhongluo Township , Gemalaka 27.98631ºN, 98.47069ºE, 3808m, 21 August 2006, Peng Hu leg. (Hu 060820) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Gongshan County, Cikai Township , Dahaituo, 27.78440°N, 98.46038°E, alt. 3363m, 13 August 2006, Peng Hu leg. (Hu 060813) GoogleMaps ; 5♀, Fugong County, Pihe Township , Yueliangtian Village, 26.56784°N, 98.90884°E, alt. 1520m, 20, 23, 24 August 2005, Guo Tang leg. (Tang –05–08) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This epithet derives from the Latin adjective “ minutus ”, meaning “small” and refers to the small body size of this spider.
Diagnosis. The new species can be distinguished from all other congeners by the tip of distal suprategular apophysisrectangular,mesallygrooved;anteriorprojection of lamella characteristca absent; lateral projection of lamella characteristca sharp, slightly curved with pointed end ( Figs 270A, B, D View FIGURE 270 , 271 View FIGURE 271 ); Entrance grooves with one coil, spermathecae tongue-shaped ( Fig. 272B, C View FIGURE 272 ).
Description. Male (holotype, Fig. 273A, B View FIGURE 273 ): Total length: 1.62. Carapace 0.77 long, 0.71 wide; cephalic region slightly elevated yellow; cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.14 high. Sternum cordiform, yellow. Labium wider than long. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae with two promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Eyes: AER recurved, PER procurved, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.05, PME 0.05, PLE 0.06, AME–AME 0.02, PME–PME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.05, PME–PLE 0.06, AME–PME 0.05, ALE–ALE 0.29, PLE–PLE 0.30, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 3.72 (1, 1.1, 1.01, 0.61), II 3.29 (0.93, 0.97, 0.88, 0.51), III 2.15 (0.66, 0.62, 0.52, 0.35), IV 2.82 (0.81, 0.84, 0.72, 0.45). Leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tm I 0.31 and Tm IV 0.18. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-2-2. Abdomen 0.96 long, 0.64 wide, oval, pale, with white patches dorsally; ventral side pale.
Palp ( Figs 270A–D View FIGURE 270 , 271 View FIGURE 271 ): Patella shorter than tibia; tibia with two retrolateral and a dorsal trichobothria; paracymbium sclerotized, U-shaped; tegulum sclerotized, excavated ventrally; distal suprategular apophysis rectangular, distal part mesally grooved. Lamella characteristca with three well developed apophyses; lateral projection longer than wide, slightly curved, extending forward; the anterior projection absent; dorsal projection short, slightly curved and the posterior projection relatively long with pointed end. Embolic membrane broad, extending forward. Embolus sclerotized, slightly curved, projecting upward.
Female (one of paratypes, Fig. 273C, D View FIGURE 273 ): Total length: 2.33. Carapace 0.88 long, 0.68 wide; cephalic region slightly elevated, yellow; cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.16 high. Sternum cordiform, yellow. Labium wider than long. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae with two promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Eyes: AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.05, PME 0.05, PLE 0.05, AME–AME 0.03, PME–PME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.05, PME–PLE 0.06, AME–PME 0.05, ALE–ALE 0.31, PLE–PLE 0.33, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 3.12 (0.83, 0.96, 0.79, 0.54), II 2.84 (0.80, 0.87, 0.68, 0.49), III 1.91 (0.59, 0.54, 0.43, 0.35), IV 2.53 (0.76, 0.75, 0.61, 0.41). Leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tm I 0.36 and Tm IV 0.21. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-2-2. Abdomen 0.88 long, 0.68 wide, oval, pale, with white patches dorsally; ventral side pale.
Epigyne ( Fig. 272A–C View FIGURE 272 ): Posteriorly with two openings of entrance grooves separated by median septum, margins curved and sclerotized. Parmula wider than long, with a socket ventrally. Vulva: wider than long, entrance grooves started from ventral wall, with one coil, turning points and spermathecae present dorso-mesally on apices; spermathecae tongue-shaped, pointing away from each other; fertilization ducts long, present dorsolaterally, extending upward.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 286 View FIGURE 286 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |