Larentiinae

Hausmann, Axel & Parra, Luis E., 2009, An unexpected hotspot of moth biodiversity in Chilean northern Patagonia (Lepidoptera, Geometridae), Zootaxa 1989, pp. 23-38 : 32-33

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.185522

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6223298

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC87C0-EB08-FF99-04D6-0055FD0BFB3A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Larentiinae
status

 

[ Larentiinae View in CoL View at ENA 2]

[172–176] [Perizomini]: Attribution to tribe according to the Palearctic concept ( Mironov 2003). For doubts about generic assignment see under P. pastoralis . Probably the species is related to Ennada and certain “ Nebula ” species e.g., N. ceres ( Larentiini ?, see below) and does not belong to Perizomini. Multigene analysis (COI, EF1alpha, 28S) shows these three branches ( Perizoma pastoralis , Ennada and Nebula ceres -group) united.

[172–176] Perizoma pastoralis ( Butler, 1882)

[177–179] Ennada pellicata ( Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875) : The position in the tribe Larentiini is well supported by habitus and genitalia structure. See remarks to [172–176]. The status of both forms with and without the projection of medial area towards the termen as infrasubspecific, infrapopulational forms is confirmed by COI data.

[180–191] “ Nebula ” sp. 1 and “ Nebula ceres ( Butler, 1882) : See remarks to [172–176].

[198–210] Eupithecia sp. 4: Difficult group with variable habitus, probably including Eupithecia spurcata (Warren, 1904) . COI data revealing a heterogenous pattern of different haplotypes, mean “intra”specific variation 1.7%, maximum pairwise distance 3.4%. Probably corresponding to several different species.

[217–219] Genus AH 6 sp. 1: Possibly an eupitheciine genus, as tentatively suggested by position in the NJ tree. In the multigene analysis (COI, EF1alpha, 28S) however rather grouping with Perizoma pastoralis than with Eupitheciini .

[220–222] “ Nebula ” diana ( Butler, 1882) and “ Nebula ” adela ( Butler, 1893): For polyphyly of the genus ” Nebula ” and doubtful generic combination(s) see remarks [41–46; 49–58; 180–191; 220–222].

[223; 226–231]: see remarks to genus Hoplosauris [30–33; 223; 226–231]

[232] Triptiloides sp. 1 ( cf. esmeralda ): Molecular analysis (COI) suggesting species diversity from T. esmeralda [233–235]: minimum pairwise distance: 2.3% (mean intraspecific variation of the latter 0.2%).

[236–240] Orthonama plemyrata ( Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875) : In Scoble (1999) as synonym of Orthonama obstipata ( Fabricius, 1794) . Separated from Old world sister species in Hausmann & Hebert (2008).

[241–242] Rheumaptera sp. 1 (cf. " Larentia " irma ): see remarks to genus Rheumaptera [59–64; 241–242]. Tribal and generic relationships awaiting revision. Molecular analysis (COI) not revealing close relationship to Palaearctic species of the genus Rheumaptera .

[#] Hoplosauris valeria Butler, 1893 : specimen not yet barcoded; unnamed genus according to Scoble (1999), but assignment to Hoplosauris probable.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Geometridae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Geometridae

Genus

Psilaspilates

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF