Parathalassiinae, Chvála, 1981

Brooks, Scott E. & Cumming, Jeffrey M., 2023, The first Neotropical and Afrotropical species of Microphorella Becker, with a key to the genera of Parathalassiinae and species of Microphorella from the Southern Hemisphere (Diptera: Dolichopodidae sensu lato), Zootaxa 5301 (5), pp. 581-593 : 591-592

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5301.5.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5FE72F9C-A430-4593-90C0-88EE2AD908D9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8044678

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABAF77-FFDF-FF8C-138C-FABACAE1F97C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Parathalassiinae
status

 

Key to the Southern Hemisphere genera of Parathalassiinae View in CoL View at ENA and species of Microphorella View in CoL View at ENA

Parts of this key were adapted from the Afrotropical dolichopodid key in Grichanov & Brooks (2017), the Australasian parathalassiine key in Brooks & Cumming (2022) and the Southeast Asian and Australian key to Microphorella in Shamshev & Grootaert (2004). For the Microphorella species, the key may be used to identify both sexes of several species, but females of M. bungle Brooks & Cumming , M. satunensis Shamshev & Grootaert and M. viticula Brooks & Cumming are unknown.

1 Wing with vein M 2 present; cell dm usually present ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 5–8 , 17 View FIGURES 14–18 ), but sometimes cell dm and crossvein dm-m absent ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2005, fig. 12).............................................................................. 3

- Wing with vein M 2, cell dm and crossvein dm-m absent ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–26 )............................................... 2

2 Head with parafacial and gena weakly developed, scarcely projected around lower eye margin ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ); mouthparts directed ventrally with fleshy labellum; palpus elongate and narrow or abruptly capitate and narrow basally ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ); fore coxa without spines ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ); male abdominal sternite 1 without medial projection on the anterior margin; female terminalia with acanthophorous setae on syntergite 9+10 ( New Caledonia, New Zealand)...... Chimerothalassius Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

- Head with well-developed parafacial and gena, distinctly projected around lower eye margin ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ); mouthparts directed posteriorly with narrow labellum ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ) and broad flat palpus; fore coxa with short spines ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ); male abdominal sternite 1 with medial projection on the anterior margin; female terminalia with acanthophorous spines on syntergite 9+10 ( Chile, Peru).................................................................. Neothalassius Brooks & Cumming View in CoL

3 Wing vein CuA straight, cell cua truncate apically, anal lobe partially developed ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27–32 ); setae of body and legs mainly pale ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27–32 )............................................................................................ 4

- Wing vein CuA rounded, cell cua convex apically to entirely ovoid, anal lobe not developed ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 5–8 , 17 View FIGURES 14–18 ); setae of body and legs pale ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ) or dark ( Figs 5, 6 View FIGURES 5–8 , 14, 15 View FIGURES 14–18 )................................................................... 5

4 Antennal postpedicel conical, or pear-shaped, tapering apically ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 27–32 ); face wide in both sexes, not narrowing in middle ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 27–32 ); postocular setae uni- to biseriate ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 27–32 ); scutum with acrostichal setae uniserial at least behind, sometimes reduced; prothoracic precoxal bridge partly developed; female terminalia with tergite 8 not cleft ( South Africa).................................................................................................. Amphithalassius Ulrich View in CoL

- Antennal postpedicel globular, or oval, broadly rounded at apex ( Figs 29, 30 View FIGURES 27–32 ); face moderately wide in both sexes, more or less narrowing in middle ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27–32 ); postocular setae multiseriate ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27–32 ); scutum with acrostichal setae paired and flanked by accessory setae; prothorax without precoxal bridge; female terminalia tergite 8 deeply cleft ( South Africa)................................................................................................ Plesiothalassius Ulrich View in CoL

5 Antenna with arista-like stylus at least 5X longer than broadly ovoid postpedicel ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2005, figs 1–4; Brooks & Cumming 2022, fig. 35); face narrow, about width of anterior ocellus; hypopygium with hypandrium and epandrium largely fused, cerci highly asymmetrical ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2005, figs 17, 29); female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous setae, cercus slender with long apical seta ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2005, fig. 20) (Southeast Asia, New Guinea, New Caledonia).................................................. Eothalassius Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

- Antenna with arista-like stylus shorter, 3X as long as variably-shaped postpedicel or shorter ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 5–8 , 15 View FIGURES 14–18 ); face width variable, with sides subparallel ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–18 ), or narrowed ventrally ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ); hypopygium with variable fusion of hypandrium and epandrium, cerci nearly symmetrical to highly asymmetrical; female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous spines ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–13 ) or setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–22 ), cercus relatively broad, with apex pointed or broadly rounded, with or without with long apical seta(e) ( Chile, South Africa, Southeast Asia, New Guinea, Australia)… Microphorella Becker. View in CoL ............................ 6

6 Body and legs with pale setation; head and thorax pale grey pollinose ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ); male palpus broadly clavate, flattened and pale ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ); female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous setae (female unknown in M. satunensis View in CoL ); coastal habitats and beaches.................................................................................. 7

- Body and legs with dark setation; head and thorax dark brownish or dark grey pollinose ( Figs 5–7 View FIGURES 5–8 , 14–16 View FIGURES 14–18 ); male palpus narrowly ovate or subtriangular, dark greyish brown to black ( Figs 6, 7 View FIGURES 5–8 , 16 View FIGURES 14–18 ); female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous spines ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–13 ) or setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–22 ); inland riparian and meadow habitats............................ 10

7 Scutum with five or six pairs of dorsocentral setae; male abdominal sternites 5 and 6 with equal sized posteromarginal processes........................................................................................... 8

- Scutum with four pairs of dorsocentral setae; male abdominal sternites 5 and 6 with unequal sized posteromarginal processes, sternite 5 process smaller or absent....................................................................... 9

8 Scutum usually with six pairs of dorsocentral setae, rarely five pairs; male fore tarsus thickened, entirely dark brown ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ); male terminalia with right surstylus very large and leaf-like ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 13, 16) ( Thailand, Malay Peninsula)........................................................... M. malaysiana Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

- Scutum with five pairs of dorsocentral setae; male fore tarsus slender with tarsomeres 1–2 yellow, tarsomere 3 brownish yellow and tarsomeres 4–5 brown; male terminalia with right surstylus large and subtriangular ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 38, 40) (Malay Peninsula)................................................... M. satunensis Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

9 Male abdominal sternite 5 with short slender posteromarginal process, sternite 6 with longer broad process ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 25, 26); male fore tarsus slightly thickened; male terminalia with right surstylus long, broad and crescent-shaped ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 27, 30) (New Guinea)................... M. papuana Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

- Male abdominal sternite 5 without posteromarginal process, sternite 6 with large broad process ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 31, 32); male fore tarsus slender; male terminalia with right surstylus long and narrow ( Shamshev & Grootaert 2004, figs 33, 35) (Sulawesi)............................................................ M. bira Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL

10 Face with lower margin projected anteriorly above frontoclypeal suture ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14–18 ); male foreleg with curled cluster of three long setae on trochanter ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–18 ) and long posterior seta on tibia ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14–18 ); male midleg with long seta on trochanter ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–18 ); male wing with larger costal seta posterior to apex ( Figs 17, 18 View FIGURES 14–18 ); female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–22 ) ( South Africa)............................................................. M. irwini sp. nov.

- Face barely projected anteriorly above obscure frontoclypeal suture ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ); male foreleg without long setae on trochanter and tibia; male midleg without long seta on trochanter; male wing without longer costal seta near apex ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5–8 ); female terminalia with syntergite 9+10 bearing acanthophorous spines ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–13 ) (female unknown in M. bungle View in CoL and M. viticula View in CoL ).......... 11

11 Scutum with acrostichal setae; antennal postpedicel with short tip ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–8 ); face strongly narrowed ventrally in male ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ), weakly narrowed ventrally in female ( Chile)............................................... M. amorimi sp. nov.

- Scutum without acrostichal setae; antennal postpedicel with tip longer and narrow ( Brooks & Cumming 2022, figs 40, 51); face in male and female evenly wide, about width of combined antennal bases or wider ( Australia)....................... 12

12 Hypopygium with phallus elongate, tightly curled ( Brooks & Cumming 2022, figs 53–55).. M. viticula Brooks & Cumming View in CoL

- Hypopygium with phallus relatively short, not tightly curled ( Brooks & Cumming 2022, figs 43–45, 47, 48)........... 13

13 Hypopygium with phallus tip bent and brush-like ( Brooks & Cumming 2022, figs 47, 48)............... M. iota Colless View in CoL

- Hypopygium with phallus tip straight and tubular ( Brooks & Cumming 2022, figs 44, 45).. M. bungle Brooks & Cumming View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Dolichopodidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF