Endeis aff. mollis ( Carpenter, 1904 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.851.1999 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7317EA8C-7C05-4E24-A38C-30F860013694 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7517135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A95E06-3E59-FFF9-FDBB-07380048BA6C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Endeis aff. mollis ( Carpenter, 1904 ) |
status |
|
Endeis aff. mollis ( Carpenter, 1904) View in CoL View at ENA
Fig. 18 View Fig
Phoxichilus mole Carpenter, 1904: 182–183 , figs 1–7.
Phoxichilus mollis – Carpenter 1907: 98. — Loman 1908: 77–78.
Endeis mollis View in CoL – Calman 1923: 293–294, fig. 16; 1927: 408; 1938: 160. — Stock 1951: 17–18, figs 23–24; 1957: 85–86; 1965: 31; 1966a: 54; 1975a: 1083–1085; 1975b: 76; 1986: 440; 1994: 19 (list), 68; 1997: 407. — Barnard 1954: 130–132, fig. 21. — Bourdillon 1954a: 4–8, figs 1–3. — Child 1977a: 441; 1979: 66; 1988a: 20–21; 1991: 144–145. — Nakamura & Child 1983: 41; 1988a: 664. — Arnaud 1987: 52. — Munilla 1994: 110. — Arango 2001: 656; 2002: 115, 120, tab. 1, figs 2–4 (phylogeny); 2003b: 2761, 2765, tab. 2, fig. 15. — Chimenz Gusso & Lattanzi 2003: tab. 1. — Paulay et al. 2003: appendix (list). — Bamber 2004: tab. 2; 2007: 256 (list). — Veena et al. 2008: 17–19, tab. 1, figs 3–5. — Müller & Krapp 2009: 115 View Cited Treatment (key), 117–119, 133, 137 (list), tab. 1, fig. 62. — Krapp & Viquez 2011: 204, tab. 1. — Gul & Ghani 2012: 206. — Sabroux et al. 2017: appendices 1–2, figs 3–5 (phylogeny); 2019b: fig. 3. — Dietz et al. 2018: 9. — Lucena & Christoffersen 2018a: 108. — Lucena et al. 2019: tab. 1. — Wang et al. 2021: 6.
Endeis cf. mollis View in CoL – Sabroux et al. 2019b: 1530, tab. 1, fig. 3.
Type material
Endeis mollis ( Carpenter, 1904) . Type(s): unknown. Type locality: Cheval Paar, Sri Lanka.
Material examined
MARTINIQUE • 1 ♀; Baie de Fort-de-France ; 14°32.6ʹ N, 61°04.7ʹ W; depth 0–1 m; 6 Sep. 2016; st. AM002; MNHN-IU-2016-838/ MK411153 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♂ ov.; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN- IU-2016-565/ MK411116 View Materials GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN-IU-2017-216 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN-IU-2017-217/ MK411200 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Remarks
The general morphology of Martinique specimens corresponds well to the description in Carpenter (1904), as well as that in Müller & Krapp (2009), including the distal spiny tubercle on the lateral processes. However, these specimens are much smaller than other records (the trunk is about half as long as indicated in Müller & Krapp 2009), the ocular tubercle and lateral processes are smaller, and the number of observed cement gland pores is 13 rather than 19 as mentioned by Müller & Krapp (2019). The CO1 barcoding tree of Sabroux et al. (2019b) showed a sister-group relationship with a specimen of Endeis mollis from Caribbean Colombia identified by Arango & Wheeler (2007), although the genetic distance is very high (p-distance = 0.157; see Appendix). It is therefore probably another species than E. mollis , but due to the complexity of taxonomy within Endeis , we refrain from describing it as a new species as long as a review for the genus is not available. All specimens were found at the same station, at the entrance of Baie de Fort-de-France.
Distribution
Endeis mollis is a commonly found pantropical species recorded from the Tropical West Atlantic (Caribbean, Surinam, Brazil), West Africa (Occidental Sahara, off Guinea, Nigeria), Indian Ocean ( South Africa, Madagascar, Somalia, Red Sea, Suez, Oman, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Christmas Islands, Philippines) and the West Pacific ( Australia, Japan mainland, Ryukyu Islands, New Caledonia, Guam, Marianas Islands, Polynesia). There is only one record from the Western Mediterranean, north of Tunis.
Depth range
0– 105 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Endeis aff. mollis ( Carpenter, 1904 )
Sabroux, Romain, Hassanin, Alexandre & Corbari, Laure 2022 |
Endeis cf. mollis
Sabroux R. & Hassanin A. & Corbari L. 2019: 1530 |
Endeis mollis
Wang J. & Sun D. & Tian P. & Huang D. & Niu W. & Zhang F. 2021: 6 |
Dietz L. & Domel J. S. & Leese F. & Lehmann T. & Melzer R. R. 2018: 9 |
Lucena R. A. & Christoffersen M. L. 2018: 108 |
Gul S. & Ghani N. 2012: 206 |
Krapp F. & Viquez C. 2011: 204 |
Muller H. - G. & Krapp F. 2009: 115 |
Veena S. & Kaladharan P. & Rohit P. & Rao G. S. 2008: 17 |
Arango C. P. 2002: 115 |
Arango C. P. 2001: 656 |
Munilla T. L. 1994: 110 |
Child C. A. 1991: 144 |
Nakamura K. & Child C. A. 1988: 664 |
Nakamura K. & Child C. A. 1983: 41 |
Child C. A. 1979: 66 |
Child C. A. 1977: 441 |
Barnard K. H. 1954: 130 |
Bourdillon A. 1954: 4 |
Stock J. H. 1951: 17 |
Calman W. T. 1923: 293 |
Phoxichilus mollis
Loman J. C. C. 1908: 77 |
Carpenter G. H. 1907: 98 |
Phoxichilus mole
Carpenter G. H. 1904: 183 |