Amerus pratensis, (Bretfeld & Griegel, 1999)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4308.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:254C1FE2-8233-43C0-9B83-7A10BC64A092 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6040257 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A8760E-7B01-4F60-72BB-F947D0A07571 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amerus pratensis |
status |
|
Acanthoneelidus pratensis ( Bretfeld & Griegel, 1999) , Bretfeld & Griegel, 2006
Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 4B, 5, 7A, 11–13
Material examined. Paratypes. 1 ♀ on three slides (specimen ‘ad. /5’) and 2 juveniles on three slides (specimens ‘juv. /7’ and ‘juv. /8’), Poland, NW, Stettin , süde. Stettin, Zwischenoderland, 26.vi.1996, A. Griegel leg., ex coll. Griegel, [ SMC].
Diagnosis. White. 300 µm length. Integumentary channels present on head, Th. II/III and abdomen. Crossed connection of channels on head with linea ventralis. Postero-dorsal area of head with 3 + 3 cylindro-conical macrochaetae and generally with stronger chaetae than anterior part of head. Unpaired chaeta a0 present on anterodorsal area of the head. Labium: basomedian fields with 4 + 4 chaetae, basolateral fields with at least 1 + 1 chaetae.
Several cylindro-conical macrochaetae on trunk. Tita I–III each with a long, external chaeta with enlarged and flattened apex. Mucro with posterior lamellae large and wavy.
Description. Size. Specimen ‘ad. /5’ in lateral position approximately matches with the measurement of 300 µm indicated by Bretfeld & Griegel (1999), ‘juv. /7’ extended in dorsal position, reaches 325 µm from labrum to anus.
Pigmentation. Not observed in ethanol, white according to Bretfeld & Griegel (1999). Slides mounted specimens without visible pigments.
Body shape and segmentation. Orthognathous. Ratio height: length of the head could not be observed. Antennae with four distinct antennomeres, apex pointed in a lateral-anterior direction, the greatest angle being between Ant. I and Ant. II, Ant. I directed laterally, the other antennomeres directed more anteriorly (angle of Ant. IV with head axis ~ 45°; Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 A, 13A, B). Total length of antenna ~ 127 µm; max width (Ant. III) ~ 15.8 µm; ratio width: length ~ 0.12; ratio length of Ant. I: Ant. II: Ant. III: Ant. IV ~ 0.27: 0.70: 0.91: 1. Th. I diameter reduced, with steep curves between head/Th. I and Th. I/II. Detail of the connection of head with Th. I could not be analyzed. Th. II, III and abdominal segmentation unclear. The cuticle of juvenile mounted in dorsal view (‘juv. /7’) displays transversal folds on thorax and abdomen, one is roughly delimiting Th. II and III areas, the others are without clear link to a putative segmentation on abdomen. At least Abd. VI is well delimited from Abd. V tergum. Dorso-median line not observed, at least not marked by the granulation, posterior granule T of the line absent. Precoxal areas of Th. II and Th. III without particular anterior enlargement. Ratio length of head: length of thorax (distance from anterior insertion point of subcoxa I to posterior insertion point of subcoxa III): length of abdomen (distance from posterior insertion point of subcoxa III to anus) ~ 1: 0.73: 0.67 (measured on ‘Juv /7’). Each coxa long and bended ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 C, E). On each leg, length of coxa> tibiotarsus ~ femur> trochanter. Abd. VI sternum clearly separated posteriorly from Abd. VI tergum by anal aperture; separated anteriorly from Abd. V sternum by a steep curve; fused laterally with the great abdomen without any distinction in the integumentary granulation. Abd. V sternum with genital plate cryptic, enclosed deeply between Abd. IV and Abd. VI. Abd. IV sternum enlarged, creating a large ventro-posterior side bearing the furca. Abd. I–III sterna reduced with tenaculum being stuck to ventral tube ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Manubrium/dens articular processes: with double convex tips on manubrium; concavity on dens ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 J). Dens with distal part (dd) only slightly wider and longer than proximal part (dp). A delimitation mark between dp and dd can be observed on posterior side but is probably a subsequent fold due to the width difference rather than a suture, there is no articular process ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 I, J). Ratio length of manubrium: dp: dd: mucro ~ 0.75: 0.9: 1: 0.75.
Granulation. Coarse secondary granulation without peculiar pattern. Strong secondary granules occur dorsally on head, thorax and abdomen. Smaller granules are present on antennae, legs, furca and Abd. VI sternum.
Integumentary channels. Integumentary channels present on head and trunk. Exact pattern could not be determined on head, at least extending to the back of the head and probably laterally on forehead. On thorax and abdomen, the channels represent a paired tree with at least seven terminal branches, passing laterally between legs II and III and rooted to the linea ventralis ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). The channel edges are thin and smooth.
Chaetae. Seven morphological variations of chaetae on body and trunk: (i) ordinary chaetae; (ii) s-chaetae, short and swollen chaetae (s1–s3; s5) found on trunk; (iii) τ-chaetae, long and flexible chaetae with basal ring implanted in a small depression of the integument, weakly contrasted in light microscopy, found on trunk; (iv) wax rod secretory crypts associated to sensory field (sf1–6); (v) free wax rod secretory crypts (wrc1–8); (vi) inner swollen chaetae of sensory fields and (vii) neosminthuroid chaetae.
Wax secretory rods and sensory fields. Six pairs of sensory fields (sf1–6) on head and trunk, each field associated with a wax rod secretory crypt. On head: sf1 preantennal, without inner swollen chaeta; sf2 postantennal with a short, candlelight-shaped inner chaeta ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 11A). On trunk: sf3 dorsally on Th. II with three globular inner swollen chaetae ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12); sf4 on precoxal area of Th. II with two globular inner swollen chaetae ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12); sf5 on precoxal area of Th. III and sf6 on dorso-posterior part of the abdomen, each with an inner swollen chaeta ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Eight pairs of free wax rod secretory crypts including seven in Th. III tergum area (wrc1–7), one in abdominal terga area (wrc8; Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12).
Mouth parts. Mandibula as described by Bretfeld & Griegel (1999), maxilla could not be precisely analyzed.
Labium. Badly preserved on available material. Basomedian field with at least four mesochaetae and basolateral field with a least one mesochaeta on tubercle ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C). Palp could not be precisely observed, apparently with six papillae including the hypostomal one.
Maxillary outer lobe and oral fold. Maxillary palp with a mesochaeta in the sub-basal papilla, a strong, straight mesochaeta in the apical papilla ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C). Rest of the chaetotaxy ambiguous: either sublobal plate with two micro-hairs and palp with a third sub-apical micro-hair, or sublobal plate with three micro-hairs and palp without a third hair ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C). Oral fold with two microchaetae ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C).
Labrum. Labrum rather plane, ordinary ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 E, 11B). a-row with two pairs of mesochaetae (a1, a2), subapical and in dorsal position; m- and p-rows each with two pairs of mesochaetae (respectively m1, 2 and p1, 2) and an unpaired mesochaeta (respectively m0 and p0; Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B). All chaetae apparently with smooth edges, pointed upward, and clearly smaller than the pre-labral mesochaetae ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B). Labral ridge sclerotized, apparently bearing a row of apical hairs as a comb of simple, thin hairs ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B).
Head chaetotaxy. Postero-dorsal area with ten pairs of chaetae (9 + 9 mesochaetae and 1 + 1 macrochaetae), the four posterior pairs the largest ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 11A). Postero-lateral area devoid of chaetae. Antero-dorsal area dorsally with 12 + 12 micro and mesochaetae, three unpaired chaetae ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 11A). Antero-lateral area with two pairs of chaetae ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 11A). The postero-dorsal chaetae stronger than the antero-dorsal chaetae. Ventral area with 2 + 2 post-labial chaetae, the axial ones longer than the external ones ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 B, 11C).
Antenna chaetotaxy. Ant. I with three chaetae on dorsal side ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). Ant. II with four chaetae in an apical whorl, dorsal side ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). Ant. III with 10 chaetae in four rough whorls (distribution from base to apex: 1, 2, 2 and 5 chaetae); with four apical S-chaetae (S1–S4), S1 and S4 long and tubular and S2 and S3 short, in shape of light-bulb ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). Ant. IV with 12 chaetae including two in apical position and two strong macrochaetae sub-apical in posterior position, proximal chaetae longer, distal chaetae shorter ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). With seven S-chaetae including from the most basal to the most apical: three in a whorl on dorsal side (one with rounded apex, the two other could not be fully observed); one in dorsal side with pointed apex; one short with pointed apex (Sx) on postero-ventral side; one long and thick with rounded apex (Sy) on postero-dorsal side; one long with apical curve and rounded apex in posterior position ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). With two sub-apical sensory rods with truncated apex (sa), equal in size; sub-apical organite short and thick, in basal position in regard to the rods sa, and apical position in regard to the s-chaeta Sx ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B). Sub-apical organite (Or) on a small papilla ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A). Due to the lack of clearness, the distinction between sa and the two apical ordinary chaetae is not so clear, however what could be observed seems to be in agreement with the original description ( Bretfeld & Griegel 1999). Ornamentation could not be studied.
Th. II–Abd. V terga chaetotaxy. Th. II–Abd. V terga with a total of 50 + 50 chaetae, 9 + 9 τ-chaetae all in the thoracic region, 4 + 4 s-chaetae (s1, s2, s3, s5) and 8 + 8 free wax rod secretion crypts ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Dorso-lateral area of Th. II with 10 + 10 chaetae including 1 + 1 macrochaetae, 4 + 4 mesochaetae and 5 + 5 microchaetae; 2 + 2 τ-chaetae posterior to sf3 ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Precoxal areas of Th. II with 5 + 5 chaetae including 1 + 1 macrochaetae, 3 + 3 mesochaetae, 1 + 1 microchaetae; 1 + 1 τ-chaetae; 1 + 1 s-chaetae (s1; Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Dorso-lateral area of Th. III–anterior abdomen with 14 + 14 chaetae including 1 + 1 macrochaetae, 7 + 7 mesochaetae and 6 + 6 microchaetae; 4 + 4 τ-chaetae; 1 + 1 s-chaetae (s3) and 5 + 5 free wax rod secretory crypts (wrc1–4, wrc7; Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Precoxal areas of Th. III with 6 + 6 chaetae including 2 + 2 macrochaetae, 1 + 1 mesochaetae and 3 + 3 microchaetae; 2 + 2 τ-chaetae; 1 + 1 s-chaetae (s5) and 2 + 2 free wax rod secretory crypts (wrc5, wrc6; Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). Posterior area of abdomen with 15 + 15 chaetae including 1 + 1 macrochaetae, 10 + 10 mesochaetae and 4 + 4 microchaetae; 1 + 1 free wax rod secretory crypts (wrc8); 1 + 1 s-chaetae (s2; Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A, 12). s1, s5 tubular, s2, s3 bean-shaped ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Legs chaetotaxy. On leg I: coxa with a microchaeta; trochanter with a mesochaeta (median); femur with six chaetae (the short, distal one may be a special swollen chaeta but the poor preservation prevents a definitive conclusion); tibiotarsus with 17 chaetae in roughly four whorl distributed from the most proximal to the most distal as 5, 3, 2, 7 ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 C). On leg II: subcoxa 1, subcoxa 2 each with a mesochaeta; coxa unclear, at least devoid of strong chaetae; trochanter with three microchaetae (2 proximal, 1 median); femur with seven chaetae (two short median microchaetae, 5 distal mesochaetae); tibiotarsus with 16 chaetae in roughly four whorls distributed from the most proximal to the most distal as 4, 3, 2, 7 ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 D). On leg III: subcoxa 1 with a macrochaeta; subcoxa 2 with a mesochaeta; coxa with two chaetae (a proximal mesochaeta, a median microchaeta); trochanter with four chaetae (2 proximal, 2 distal); femur with 8 mesochaetae (1 proximal, 4 median, 3 distal); tibiotarsus with 15 chaetae in roughly four whorls distributed from the most proximal to the most distal as 4, 3, 2, 6 ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 E). There is least a long, flattened external chaeta and three pairs of internal thickened chaetae on each tibiotarsus ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 C–E). See Tables 9, 10, 11 for a summary.
Claws. Each pretarsus bearing two chaetae as short microspines with rounded apex, one on anterior side and one on posterior side ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 F–H). Unguis: la and lp not seen, however could be masked by the external edge of lamella L ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 F–H). Lamella Bp absent ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 F–H). Unguiculus: basal tubercle with a bulk anterior process and a thinner posterior process, both well-developed ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 F–H). Presence or absence of crests of unguiculal lamella (Ca, Cp) could not be verified on available material.
Abd. VI. Tergum: a-row with nine mesochaetae (two pairs and an unpaired), m-row with 2 + 2 mesochaetae. Each anal valve with a microchaeta (av, Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Sternum with 7 + 7 chaetae ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Genital plate. Female with maybe 1 + 1 microchaetae (unclear on material). Male unknown.
Abd. IV sternum. With 3 + 3 chaetae and 1 + 1 strong neosminthuroid chaetae ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Neosminthuroid chaetae covered with small spicules on whole length ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Abdominal appendages. Manubrium with 4 + 4 posterior chaetae, arranged in two rows of two chaetae parallel with the axis of symmetry, the axial row with shorter chaetae than the external row ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 I). Proximal part of dens with one postero-median chaeta. Distal part of dens with five posterior, strong chaetae and three antero-distal spine-like chaetae, each with a basal ring at the possible exception of A1 ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 I, J). Mucro elliptical with large, waved, lamellae and a round apex ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 I, J). Tenaculum with two medians lobes without chaeta, with 4 + 4 apical teeth ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Ventral tube without posterior lobe and with 2 + 2 apical mesochaetae ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Discussion. The genus is monotypic. It has various affinities with other genera of Neelipleona : labrum morphology, claw morphology and presence of s-chaetae s5 are similar to Neelides ; general chaetotaxic pattern of the body and secondary granulation are similar to Megalothorax ; a unique pair of neosminthuroid chaetae is similar to Neelus . The integumentary channels on Th. II/Th. III are comparable to those of M. perspicillum . It also shares some characteristics with Megalothorax of the incertus -group sensu Schneider & D’Haese (2013): 4 + 4 teeth on the tenaculum, globular inner chaetae of sensory fields, presence of s-chaetae s3 and 3 + 3 chaetae on Abd. IV sternum. The presence of only one inner chaeta in sf5 is similar to the juvenile of Megalothorax . A. pratensis was described with four large and blunt teeth on the external, posterior lamella of mucro ( Bretfeld and Griegel 1999). I was not able to distinguish those teeth from the waves of the lamella.
SMC |
Sedgwick Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |