Sunius tectus, Assing, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5324126 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A63875-AF06-F46F-0DF5-FAA2ABE0FAEE |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Sunius tectus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sunius tectus View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 18-27 View Figs 18-27 )
T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype: " Oman, Dhofar - NV, 24.VIII.1994, leg. A. Rihane / Holotypus Sunius tectus sp. n. det. V. Assing 2010 " (cAss). Paratype [slightly teneral]: " Oman, Dhofar - AL, 6.IX.1994, leg. A. Rihane" (cAss).
D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length 3.4-3.6 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 18 View Figs 18-27 . Coloration: head and pronotum reddish; elytra dark-yellowish; abdomen blackish-brown, with the posterior 1/3 of segments VII and VIII reddish; legs reddish-yellow; antennae reddish.
Head approximately 1.05 times as wide as long ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18-27 ); punctation coarse and dense; interstices without microsculpture, distinctly narrower than diameter of punctures ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18-27 ). Eyes distinctly projecting from lateral contours of head, approximately 0.8 times as long as postocular region in dorsal view. Labrum with long process on either side of median excision.
Pronotum approximately as long as wide and 0.90-0.95 times as wide as head ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18-27 ); punctation dense, somewhat less coarse than that of head; midline impunctate only in posterior half ( Fig. 21 View Figs 18-27 ).
Elytra broad and long, approximately 1.2 times as long as pronotum; humeral angles marked ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18-27 ); punctation very dense, finer than that of pronotum, more pronounced and more defined near scutellum than elsewhere; interstices without microsculpture, narrower than diameter of punctures. Hind wings fully developed.
Abdomen slightly narrower than elytra; punctation fine and dense; interstices with microsculpture primarily composed of isodiametric meshes; posterior margin of tergite VII with palisade fringe.
: sternite VII with dense, but not distinctly modified pubescence, posterior margin not distinctly concave ( Fig. 22 View Figs 18-27 ); sternite VIII approximately as long as broad, with moderately sparse pubescence, posterior excision of broadly triangular shape, its depth approximately 1/5 the length of sternite ( Fig. 23 View Figs 18-27 ); aedeagus 0.68 mm long, ventral process extremely long and slender ( Figs 24-26 View Figs 18-27 ); internal sac with sclerotized spine-like internal structures of characteristic shapes and arrangement ( Fig. 27 View Figs 18-27 ).
E t y m o l o g y: The specific epithet (Latin, adjective: secret, hidden) refers to the fact that it was previously confounded with S. sinaicus .
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Based on the male sexual characters, as well as the external characters (habitus, punctation, shape of labrum), this species undoubtedly belongs to the S. sinaicus group, which is characterized particularly by the morphology of the aedeagus (long ventral process, numerous sclerotized spines of various sizes in internal sac) and which comprises three species in the Middle East ( S. sinaicus , S. extensissimus , S. tectus ). Sunius tectus is reliably distinguished from the similarly coloured S. sinaicus only by the broader head, the much longer ventral process of the aedeagus, and the internal structures of the aedeagus. It is separated from S. extensissimus by the paler coloration of the head and pronotum, the uniformly reddish-yellow elytra, the shallower and less dense punctation of the elytra, the shapes and chaetotaxy of the male sternites VII and VIII, as well as by the morphology of the aedeagus, particularly by the shape of the ventral process. For illustrations of the aedeagus of S. sinaicus see COIFFAIT (1984).
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d n a t u r a l h i s t o r y: Thespecimenswerecollected in two localities in Dhofar province, southern Oman, in August and September. The paratype is slightly teneral.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |