Martensiellus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.174076 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6260944 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A5879D-7538-FF9B-FE98-5FE5DE332DC4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Martensiellus |
status |
|
? Martensiellus View in CoL n. g. spp.
Figs 18–22 View FIGURES 18 – 22
Two females from other parts of Borneo possess the same characteristics in somatic morphology (tarsal formula 1122, leg tarsi/tarsomeres fairly large, a tarsal pore present on legs I and II) that place M. tenuipalpus n. sp. apart from all other described oncopodid species. I assume that these females also belong to Martensiellus n. g. and represent two undescribed species distinct from M. tenuipalpus n. sp. However, generic placement without conspecific males is uncertain and I therefore refrain from formally describing and naming them.
1. female (MHNG): Eastern Malaysia, Sarawak, Mulu National Park, near headquarters (4°00’N, 114°49’E), 200 m, collected on 19–24 August 2003 from rain forest leaf litter by A. Schulz. Different from the males of M. tenuipalpus n. sp. by: Body distinctly smaller (2.75 mm long); eye tubercle more conical ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); legs more slender and palpal tibia thicker; carapaceopisthosoma bridge present, divided; tiny process on palpal trochanter; distinct ventral process on proximal article of chelicera ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); tarsus of leg II relatively longer ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ).
2. female (collection of C. DeelemanReinhold; mentioned in Martens & Schwendinger 1998: 548): Indonesia, Central Kalimantan Province, Kaharian (2°02’S, 113°40’E), collected from the leaf litter of a swampy primary forest on 2–16 October 1985 by S. Djojosudharmo. Different from males of M. tenuipalpus n. sp. by: Body much larger (5.19 mm long); eye tubercle broadly rounded; carapaceopisthosoma bridge present, undivided ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); legs more slender and papal tibia thicker; process on palpal trochanter large, bifid ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); chelicera more robust, with distaddirected dorsodistal process on proximal article and ventrodistal process on second article ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ). Tarsus of leg II ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ) similar to that of M. tenuipalpus n. sp. ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 4 – 10 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |