Microlaqueus, Andrew Hamilton, K. G., 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4169.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B8B067BF-F6E6-4122-B884-AA385FF04421 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5613290 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A5742D-FFDF-AE00-FF76-A8A0CC8BFC2E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2016-09-20 06:10:31, last updated 2024-11-28 20:39:42) |
scientific name |
Microlaqueus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Microlaqueus gen.nov.
Type-species: Microlaqueus isolatus sp.nov., the only included species.
Etymology. micro- small, laqueus (m) snare, referring to the oval apical cells of the tegmen.
Distribution. Jamaica.
Diagnosis. Antenna with small postpedicel bearing 7 coeloconic sensillum pits of 2 distinct sizes with prominent double rims ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24 E) around the base of a short, broad basiconic sensillum ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24 D). Eye longer than lateral margins of pronotum. Tegmina each with venation irregular, not contrastingly pale, costal margin with 3–4 perpendicular crossveins, outer anteapical cell very slender, tegminal tip with small, round preapical cell edged with 4–5 still smaller apical cells, inner 2 apical cells distinctly larger ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 A).
Remarks. The numerous small cells around the pointed tegminal tips are unique, and the large coeloconic sensilla tightly grouped around the basiconic sensillum are distinctive within the Microsarganini, resembling the sensilla of some old-world Cercopinae ( Liang & Fletcher 2002).
Only one species is known.
Liang, A. - P. & Fletcher, M. J. (2002) Morphology of the antennal sensilla in four Australian spittlebug species (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) with implications for phylogeny. Australian Journal of Entomology, 41, 39 - 44. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1046 / j. 1440 - 6055.2002.00266. x
FIGURES 24. Antennal characters of Microsarganini: A, Microsargane vittata, antenna in situ, scale line 200 µm; B, same, detail of pedicel and postpedicel, scale line 100 µm; C, Microlaqueus isolatus, antenna in situ; D, same, detail of pedicel and postpedicel, scale line 100 µm; E, same, closeup of antennal pits; F, Microclimax luteosignatus, detail of postpedicel, scale line 50 µm; G, same, closeup of antennal pits; H, Microrhaphe martialis, detail of pedicel and postpedicel, scale line 100 µm; J, Liparonotum praenitidum; antenna in situ; K, same, detail of pedicel and postpedicel, scale line 50 µm; L, same, details of sensilla, larger scale than others; M, Microtholia karykroua, antenna in situ, scale line 100 µm.
FIGURES 1 – 8. Examples of Microsarganini (1 – 3), Neaenini (4 – 5) and genera related to Phymatostetha (6 – 8) in dorsolateral aspect (A), dorsal aspect (B), lateral or ventrolateral aspect of head and thorax (C) and hind wing characters including detail of costal margin (D): 1, Microsargane sp.; 2, Microclimax luteosignatus; 3, Microlaqueus isolatus; 4, Helioptera gilvum; 5, Tomaspisinella lucifer sp. nov.; 6, Olcotomaspis laterinotata (Fowler), comb. nov.; 7, Hyalotomaspis clarissa (Jacobi); 8, Tomaspisina frontalis (Walker).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
1 (by plazi, 2016-09-20 06:10:31)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-01-29 06:00:19)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-01-29 06:02:33)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 08:14:09)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 00:44:49)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 06:39:34)
7 (by plazi, 2023-10-27 05:59:35)