Stenopelmatus erythromelas Walker
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4917.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D89148CE-EE8A-46B8-8D8B-8F5790063FC4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4467609 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A4C420-8A56-FB64-9B84-21A61B5CFE4E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stenopelmatus erythromelas Walker |
status |
|
Stenopelmatus erythromelas Walker View in CoL
Red-Black Jerusalem Cricket
Figs. 45–47 View FIGURE 45 View FIGURE 46 View FIGURE 47
1869. Stenopelmatus erythromelas . Lectotype adult female ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ) here chosen. Catalogue of the specimens of Dermaptera Saltatoria in the collection of the British Museum 1:193. (1) Red label holotype. (2) One of Walkers series so named erythromelas. (3) Stenopelmatus erythromelas Walker. From Mexico. Although label says one of Walkers series, according to Hubbell (1960) this is the only specimen now in the collection at NHMUK, and original description only lists one female “14 lines” (one line equals 1/12 of an inch, so 14 lines equals about 33 mm) in body length. Plus, Judith Marshall confirms (pers. comm. DBW 1/2020) that label #2 was placed before Walker’s types were properly checked for status, and that NHMUK prefers to leave such erroneous labels even after confirmation of uniqueness. Measurements in mm: Body length 30, hind femur length 14.1, hind femur width 5.0. The rear leg tibial spines ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 ) and ovipositor ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 ), indicate that this specimen probably belongs in Stenopelmatus . Face ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ) with furrow. New status: Nomen dubium, given the absence of more specific locality data and any distinguishing physical features.
Derivation of name. “erythros” is Greek for red; “melas” is black according to Judith Marshall, apparently in reference to the reddish (orange) head, pronotum, and legs contrasting with the black abdomen, the latter the probable result of discoloration upon drying.
Discussion. The original description says “There are traces of wings.” As this is an adult female, such wings, or pads, should be readily visible, and they are not. Judith Marshall, who examined this specimen in 1998, wrote that one might erroneously think the trochantin is a small wing pad. Additionally, Hubbell (1960) made no note of seeing any wing pads and we also didn’t see any pads when we examined the type in 1998.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |