Securiops, : Kluge, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5343.3.2 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB852CA9-6C6E-4016-9972-AAF2C378E41F |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8335763 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487CE-FFE0-FFCD-85A5-562C6EE1FC38 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Securiops |
| status |
|
Status of Securiops View in CoL View at ENA .
Kaltenbach et al. (2023) treated Securiops as a genus but not as a subgenus, reporting the following its characters as generic ones: ́(1) labium with strongly reduced glossae, enlarged paraglossae, and very broad, hatchet-like palps; (2) tergalii I–IV with two lamellae; (3) legs elongate, with relatively few short setae on dorsal and ventral margins; (4) claws very elongate, without denticles; and (5) lateral margins of posterior abdominal segments with sharp spines». Actually, only the first of these characters constitutes autapomorphy of the subgenus Securiops , while the characters (2)–(5) are diagnostic for the taxon Cloeon /fg1, to which the subgenus Securiops belongs. The regular lateral row of greatly enlarged spines on distal part of cercus ( Figs 71–72 View FIGURES 70–76 , 105 View FIGURES 98–105 , 124–125 View FIGURES 120–125 ) is the most important diagnostic character of Procloeon s. l., to which the subgenus Securiops belongs.
Distribution. Paleotropical (Afrotropical and Oriental Regions).
Species composition. Afrotropical species: Procloeon ( Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947) comb. n.; P. ( S.) macafertiorum (Lugo-Ortiz in Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty 1996); P. ( S.) mandrare ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.; P. ( S.) megapalpus ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.; P. ( S.) mutadens ( Jacobus, McCafferty & Gattolliat 2006) comb. n.. Oriental species: Procloeon ( Securiops) primasia ( Kaltenbach et al. 2023) comb. n.
Key to larvae (the number in parentheses refers to the antithesis)
1(4) Hind protoptera present ( Figs 29 View FIGURES 25–30 , 67 View FIGURES 66–69 ) (can be poorly visible, since cuticle of hind protopteron is colorless)............... 2
2(3) Abdominal terga IV–X with numerous scales ( Figs 55–56 View FIGURES 53–58 ); terga IV and VII without medial longitudinal stripe ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–30 )........................................................................................... P. ( S.) falcatum
3(2) All abdominal terga without scales, with numerous denticles ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 70–76 ); terga IV–V and VII–IX with contrasting medial longitudinal stripe on light background ( Figs 66, 69 View FIGURES 66–69 )........................................ P. ( S.) macafertiorum
4(1) Hind protoptera absent ( Fig. 108, 111 View FIGURES 106–115 ) or represented by short vestiges ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 98–105 ).
5(6) Spines on lateral side of cercus sharply differentiated: in proximal portion of cercus all spines stout, conic and not longer than next cercomere; in distal portion of cercus all spines delicate, widened from base, as long as 2–3 next cercomeres ( Figs 124–125 View FIGURES 120–125 ). Tergalii with apex stretched and pointed, resembling linden leaf ( Figs 18–24 View FIGURES 1–24 )................. P. ( S.) primasia
6(5) Spines on lateral side of cercus gradually change from shorter in proximal part of cercus to longer in its distal part ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 98–105 ). Tergalii with apex rounded ( Gillies 1988: figs 14–19)..................................................................................................... P. ( S.) mutadens ; possibly, also ( S.) mandrare View in CoL and P. ( S.) megapalpus View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubGenus |
Securiops |
