Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5276.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:92300500-BB24-45B0-8ADD-977C3220A069 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7907320 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A4878E-EE5A-3853-BEE1-FA1FF046FAE3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-05-01 08:31:03, last updated 2024-11-26 23:29:51) |
scientific name |
Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958 |
status |
|
Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958 View in CoL comb. rev.
( Figs 14–15 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 , 45 View FIGURE 45 )
Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958: 321 View in CoL ; Hull, 1962 (2): 481, 482, figs. 349, 394, 786, 1545, 1554, 2201, 2205 (synopsis of world fauna).
Ctenodontina carrerai View in CoL ; Martin & Papavero, 1970: 70 (catalogue, combination); Lamas, 1972: 313 (catalogue); Lamas, 1973: 275 (synonym of Ctenodontina maya Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953 View in CoL ); Artigas & Papavero, 1995: 36, figs. 17–26 (status revalidated); Papavero, 2009: 30 (catalogue, synonym of Ctenodontina maya Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953 View in CoL ); Sánchez & Camargo, 2021: 273 View Cited Treatment , 274, 278, fig. 4 (status revalidated, key).
Ctenodontina maya View in CoL ; Lamas, 1973: 275, 276, figs. 1–3 (key); Fisher, 1985: 34 (species list); Artigas & Papavero, 1995: 36, figs. 12, 27, 29–34 ( Lecania View in CoL -group catalogue); Papavero, 2009: 30 (catalogue); Vieira, 2012: 2, fig. 1 (key); Vieira, 2014: 314 (comments); Vieira, Ayala-Landa & Rafael, 2017: 290, figs. 1, 3 (key); Sánchez & Camargo, 2021: 275 View Cited Treatment , 276, 278, fig. 5 (comments, key).
Diagnosis. Face greyish white pruinose; ocellar tubercle with two pairs of proclinated black setae; mystical mystacal white, with a few black macrosetae dorsally; fore and mid femora sharply marked with black stripe on anterodorsal surface ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ); hind femur wholly black ( Fig. 14C View FIGURE 14 ); fore and mid tibiae wholly pale, except for a short discal black spot on anterior surface; hind tibia blackish or dark brown on outer fifth ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ); hind femur with a cluster of 15 or more short, stout, sub-tuberculate, black and yellow macrosetae closely set and appressed ( Fig. 14C View FIGURE 14 ); terminalia black ( Fig. 14D View FIGURE 14 ); dorsal epandrial margin without an indentation, gently concave on its mid-length ( Fig. 15A–B, F View FIGURE 15 ); apex of epandrium with a short projection pointed downwards ( Fig. 15A–B, F View FIGURE 15 ); apex of gonocoxite almost sickle-like shape apically ( Fig. 15G–H View FIGURE 15 ). This diagnosis is based on the original description of Hull (1958) and the description of the male terminalia provided in an addendum by Sánchez & Camargo (2021).
Taxonomic discussion. The type of this species was deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de S„o Paulo (MZUSP) ( Papavero 2009), however in two recent visits by the senior author to the collection (2015 and 2017), the type was not located and it is considered lost (see Sánchez & Camargo 2021).
Lamas (1973) synonymized this species with Ctenodontina maya Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953 . Back in that time, only three species were known: Ctenodontina carrerai , Ctenodontina maya and Ctenodontina pectinatipes Enderlein, 1914 . Lamas (1973) described the fourth species, Ctenodontina mochica Lamas, 1973 , and as pointed out by Sánchez & Camargo (2021), the discrepancy between Ctenodontina pectinatipes and Ctenodontina mochica , may have led Lamas (1973) to recognize Ctenodontina carrerai as a synonym of Ctenodontina maya , since they are much more similar when compared with Ctenodontina mochica and Ctenodontina pectinatipes .
Recently, Sánchez & Camargo (2021) revalidated the status of this species and described the male terminalia in an addendum to the original description, including new distribution records for Peru. This revalidation was based mainly on characters of the male terminalia. The femoral swelling in Catostola carrerai comb. rev., is shallower and almost inconspicuous ( Fig. 14C View FIGURE 14 ); the dorsal epandrial margin lacks an indentation (gently concave) on its mid-length ( Fig. 15A–B, F View FIGURE 15 ); the epandrial apex possesses a short projection pointed downwards ( Fig. 15A–B, F View FIGURE 15 ) and the gonocoxal apex is sickle-like shaped ( Fig. 15G–H View FIGURE 15 ). In the other hand Catostola maya comb. rev. has a conspicuous femoral swelling ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ); the dorsal epandrial margin has an indentation on its mid-length ( Fig. 24E View FIGURE 24 ); the epandrial apex is rounded and pointed posteriorly ( Fig. 24E View FIGURE 24 ) and the gonocoxal apex is enlarged, spatulated and rounded ( Fig. 25E View FIGURE 25 ).
Contrastingly, Catostola carrerai comb. rev., is more similar to Catostola sagta ( Vieira, Ayala-Landa & Rafael, 2017) comb. nov., which also possesses an almost inconspicuous femoral swelling on the male hind femora ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ). The main differences are again in the male terminalia. In Catostola sagta comb. nov., the dorsal epandrial margin possesses a gentle indentation on its mid-length and a very conspicuous dorsal apical projection only slightly downwards curved apically, its proximal part much more enlarged ( Fig. 34E View FIGURE 34 ) and the apex of the gonocoxite is pointed ( Fig. 35E View FIGURE 35 ).
It is interesting to mention that in the description of Catostola stat. rev., Hull (1958) describes the S8 and in the description of the species, he calls the same structure as hypandrium. With the revalidation of Catostola carrerai comb. rev., by Sánchez & Camargo (2021) and with the current revalidation of the status of Catostola stat. rev., in the present work this species becomes a valid species of Catostola stat. rev.
Only additional specimens collected in Peru were available for our study through images, which were kindly sent to us by Pável Sánchez (MUSM). Thus, we decided to provide only a brief diagnosis for this species, since redescription based on images should be avoided because some important characters like pruinosity and chaetotaxy would not be properly seen or described.
Distribution ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ). Peru, (Junín, Valle Chanchamayo and Madre de Dios, Tambopata) ( Hull 1958; Lamas 1973; Sánchez & Camargo 2021).
Artigas, J. N. & Papavero, N. (1995) The American genera of Asilidae (Diptera): Keys for identification with an atlas of female spermathecae and other morphological details. IX. 10. Subfamily Asilinae Leach - Lecania - Group, with a catalogue of Neotropical species. Theoria, 4, 33 - 56.
Carrera, M & d'Andretta, M. A. V. (1953) Asilideos do Peru (Diptera). Papeis Avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia, 11 (9), 63 - 78.
Enderlein, G. (1914) Dipterologische Studien. XI. Zur Kenntnis tropisher Asiliden. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 44 (6), 241 - 263.
Fisher, E. M. (1985) A preliminary list of robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) of the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios, Peru. Revista Peruana de Entomologia, 27, 25 - 36.
Hull, F. M. (1958) New genera of robber flies (Diptera, Asilidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 18 (3), 317 - 324.
Hull, F. M. (1962) Robber flies of the world. The genera of the family Asilidae. Smithsonian Institution Bulletin, 294 (1 & 2), 1 - 432 & 433 - 907. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.224
Lamas, G. M. (1972) A catalogue of Peruvian Asilidae (Diptera), with keys to the identification and descriptions of two new species. Revista Peruana de Entomologia, 15 (2), 304 - 316.
Lamas, G. M. (1973) Some comments on the genus Ctenodontina Enderlein (Diptera, Asilidae), with the description of a new species from coastal Peru. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 26 (23), 275 - 280.
Martin, C. H. & Papavero, N. (1970) Family Asilidae. In: Papavero, N. (Ed.), A Catalogue of the Diptera of the Americas South of the United States 35 b. Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de S o Paulo, S o Paulo, pp 1 - 139.
Papavero, N. (2009) Catalogue of Neotropical Diptera. Asilidae. Neotropical Diptera, 17, 1 - 178.
Sanchez, P. & Camargo, A. (2021) Description of the female of Ctenodontina mochica Lamas, revalidation of Ctenodontina carrerai (Hull) stat. rev., and comments on the taxonomy and distribution of Peruvian species of Ctenodontina Enderlein (Diptera: Asilidae: Asilinae). Zootaxa, 5027 (2), 269 - 281. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 5027.2.7
Vieira, R. (2012) Ctenodontina Enderlein, 1914 (Diptera, Asilidae, Asilinae): First record for Brazil and description of a new species. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012, 1 - 6. https: // doi. org / 10.5402 / 2012 / 517410
Vieira, R. (2014) Description of the female of Ctenodontina nairae Vieira (Diptera, Asilidae, Asilinae), with new distribution records. Revista Brasileira de Entmologia, 58 (4), 313 - 315. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0085 - 56262014005000005
Vieira, R., Ayala-Landa, J. M. & Rafael, J. A. (2017) Ctenodontina Enderlein, 1914 (Diptera, Asilidae, Asilinae): new combinations, synonyms, new species and new records for Argentina. Zootaxa, 4216 (3), 279 - 291. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4216.3.5
FIGURE 14. Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958 comb. rev., male. A. Habitus, lateral; B. Postpedicel and stylus, anterior; C. Hind femur, anterior (yellow arrow indicates cluster of macrosetae); D. Terminalia, lateral. Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; epand: epandrium; goncx: gonocoxite; gonst: gonostylus; hypd: hypandrium; st: sternite; tg: tergite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 15. Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958 comb. rev., male. A. Terminalia, lateral; B. Terminalia dissected, lateral; C. Sternite 8, ventral; D. Terminalia, dorsal; E. Same, ventral; F. Epandrium, lateral; G. Gonocoxite, lateral, external; H. Same, internal; I. Phallus, lateral; J. Same, lateral. Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; ej apod: ejaculatory apodeme; goncx: gonocoxite; goncx apod: gonocoxal apodeme; gonst: gonostylus; ph: phallus; subepand scl: subepandrial sclerite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 24. Catostola maya (Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953) comb. rev., male. A. Terminalia, dorsal; B. Same, ventral; C. Same, lateral; D. Sternite 8, ventral; E. Epandrium, lateral (holotype); F. Tergite 8, dorsal (holotype); G. Hypandrium, ventral (holotype). Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; epand: epandrium; goncx: gonocoxite; gonst: gonostylus; hypd: hypandrium; ph: phallus; st: sternite; subepand scl: subepandrial sclerite; tg: tergite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 25. Catostola maya (Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953) comb. rev., holotype (D–F, H–I), additional male (A–C, G). A. Gonopods + phallus, lateral; B. Same, dorsal; C. Same, ventral; D. Gonopods, lateral; E. Gonocoxite, lateral; F. Gonostylus, lateral; G. Phallus, lateral; H. Cercus and subepandrial sclerite, lateral; I. Same, ventral. Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; ej apod: ejaculatory apodeme; goncx: gonocoxite; goncx apod: gonocoxal apodeme; gonst: gonostylus; ph: phallus; subepand scl: subepandrial sclerite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 26. Catostola maya (Carrera & d’Andretta, 1953) comb. rev., male. A. Hind femur and tibia, anterior (holotype); B. Same, detail, anterior (holotype); C. Hind femur and tibia, anterior; D. Same, detail, anterior. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 34. Catostola sagta (Vieira, Ayala-Landa & Rafael, 2017) comb. nov., holotype male (A–C, G: additional male). A. Terminalia, dorsal; B. Same, ventral; C. Same, lateral; D. Sternite 8, ventral; E. Epandrium, lateral; F. Tergite 8, dorsal; G. Hypandrium, ventral. Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; epand: epandrium; goncx: gonocoxite; hypd: hypandrium; ph: phallus; st: sternite; subepand scl: subepandrial sclerite; tg: tergite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 35. Catostola sagta (Vieira, Ayala-Landa & Rafael, 2017) comb. nov., holotype male (A–C: additional male). A. Gonopods + phallus, lateral; B. Same, dorsal; C. Same, ventral; D. Gonopods, lateral; E. Gonocoxite, lateral; F. Gonostylus, lateral; G. Phallus, lateral; H. Cercus and subepandrial sclerite, lateral; I. Same, ventral. Abbreviations: cerc: cercus; ej apod: ejaculatory apodeme; goncx: gonocoxite; goncx apod: gonocoxal apodeme; gonst: gonostylus; ph: phallus; subepand scl: subepandrial sclerite. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIGURE 37. Catostola sagta (Vieira, Ayala-Landa & Rafael, 2017) comb. nov., holotype male. A. Right hind femur and tibia, lateral; B. Left hind femur, detail, anterior; C. Left hind femur and tibia, anterior; D. Left hind femur, detail of ventral swelling. Scale bar 1 mm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Asilinae |
Genus |
Catostola carrerai Hull, 1958
Camargo, Alexssandro, Vieira, Rodrigo & Rafael, José Albertino 2023 |
Ctenodontina maya
Sanchez, P. & Camargo, A. 2021: 275 |
Vieira, R. & Ayala-Landa, J. M. & Rafael, J. A. 2017: 290 |
Vieira, R. 2014: 314 |
Vieira, R. 2012: 2 |
Papavero, N. 2009: 30 |
Artigas, J. N. & Papavero, N. 1995: 36 |
Fisher, E. M. 1985: 34 |
Lamas, G. M. 1973: 275 |
Ctenodontina carrerai
Sanchez, P. & Camargo, A. 2021: 273 |
Papavero, N. 2009: 30 |
Artigas, J. N. & Papavero, N. 1995: 36 |
Lamas, G. M. 1973: 275 |
Lamas, G. M. 1972: 313 |
Martin, C. H. & Papavero, N. 1970: 70 |
Catostola carrerai
Hull, F. M. 1958: 321 |