EUCTENIZINAE
Homostola Simon, 1892a
Raven (1985: 182) suggested that his placement of
Homostola
in the
Cyrtaucheniidae
View in CoL
was questionable and considered inclusion in the
Nemesiidae
View in CoL
to be a plausible alternative. In his intrafamilial phylogeny ( Raven, 1985: fig. 8)
Homostola
is at the base of the Cyrtaucheniinae as part of an unresolved trichotomy. We have examined many putative
Homostola zebrina Purcell, 1902
and other
Homostola spp.
from South Africa. Although most
H. zebrina
specimens are unassociated males and females, their coloration, spination, and general somatic morphology indicate that individuals from neighbouring localities are conspecific. Female
H. zebrina
specimens appear to be congenerics of the type
H. vulpecula Simon, 1892a
based on spination pattern (preening combs on tarsus III and IV), spermathecal morphology (single tall unbranched receptacle with light, even sclerotization), palpal endite and labial cuspule patterns (almost identical to that of
Aptostichus simus
View in CoL
), and abdominal coloration. However, the male mating clasper morphology is like that illustrated by Raven (1985) for the nemesiid genus
Spiroctenus Simon, 1889b
. Although Raven (1985) considered it likely that
H. zebrina
was a
Spiroctenus
, he made no nomenclatural changes. We likewise have examined the
Spiroctenus
holotype
S. personatus Simon, 1889b
, and agree that its mating clasper is similar in structure to that of
H. zebrina
. Thus,
Spiroctenus
is probably a junior synonym of
Homostola
, a change first suggested by Hewitt (1915). Consequently its position within the
Nemesiidae
View in CoL
, or the placement of
H. zebrina
in
Homostola
, is questionable. Since this study does not examine nemesiid phylogeny we do not propose any nomenclatural changes that would affect these two genera.
We have scored
Homostola
character states on the basis of the female holotype
Homostola vulpecula (USMN)
. We have also examined over 30 male and female specimens (many of these previously determined as
H. zebrina
from South Africa (PPRI)). Based on the lack of differences between the type specimen
Homostola vulpecula
and
H. zebrina
specimens, both male and female, we think the more likely of the aforementioned alternatives is
Spiroctenus
as a junior synonym of
Homostola
. There are five described species of
Homostola
.
Exemplars:
Homostola vulpecula
♀: South Africa, HOLOTYPE ( MNHN).
Homostola sp.
♀: South Africa, Transvaal, Drakensberg Mtns,
Blyde
River
Canyon
, 23–25 December 1990, V. & B. Roth ( CAS).
Homostola sp.
♀: South Africa, Kwazulu-Natal, Pongola, S 27∞28¢, E 32∞7¢, N. Genis (84/755, PPRI).
H. zebrina
♂: South Africa, Kwazulu-Natal,
Ngome State Forest
, S 27∞49¢, E 31∞26, March 1992, M.van der Merwe (93/543, PPRI).
Myrmekiaphila Atkinson, 1886
View in CoL
Myrmekiaphila species
from Virginia, Florida and Texas were examined. There are four nominal species of
Myrmekiaphila
View in CoL
.
Exemplar:
Myrmekiaphila comstocki Bishop & Crosby, 1926
♂: USA, Texas, Travis Co., Austin, 12 February 1969, B. Vogel (AMNH).
Myrmekiaphila torreya Gertsch & Wallace, 1936
♀: USA, Florida, Liberty Co., 4 November 1938 (AMNH).
Aptostichus Simon, 1891a
View in CoL
Over 300
Aptostichus
View in CoL
specimens were examined. Due to the presence of polymorphic characters we have included two terminals for
Aptostichus
View in CoL
in this analysis. Both unpublished molecular studies and variations in morphology (e.g. the serrated embolus tip
A. simus Chamberlin, 1917
View in CoL
shares with
Myrmekiaphila
View in CoL
) potentially bring into question
Aptostichus
View in CoL
monophyly. There are five described and approximately 30 undescribed species of
Aptostichus ( Bond, 1999)
View in CoL
.
Exemplars:
Aptostichus atomarius Simon, 1891a
female HOLOTYPE (MNHN);
Aptostichus atomarius
♀ ♂: USA, California, Los Angeles Co., Baldwin Hills, December 1994, G. Morris (AMNH).
Aptostichus simus Chamberlin, 1917
♂: USA, California, Los Angeles Co., Playa Del Rey Beach, 6 November 1982 (AMNH).
Aptostichus simus
♀: USA, California, San Diego Co., Silver Strand State Beach, 4 November 1982, M.G. Ramirez (AMNH).
For the remaining euctenizine genera, generic descriptions provide details regarding types and additional material examined.
Exemplars:
Eucteniza Ausserer, 1875
:
Astrosoga rex Chamberlin, 1940
male HOLOTYPE: USA, Texas, Kingsville, J. Cross (AMNH);
Astrosoga stolida Gertsch & Mulaik, 1940
female HOLOTYPE: USA, Texas, Austin, 1903;
Eucteniza sp.
♂: Mexico, Baja California Del Sur, La Paz, El Sombrero Trailer Park, 15 July 1968, Bentzien; ♀: Baja California Del Sur, La Paz, 8 miles south-east, 18 October 1968, Sleeper & Moore (AMNH).
Promyrmekiaphila Schenkel, 1950
:
Promyrmekiaphila sp.
♀ ♂: USA, California, Santa Cruz Co., Ben Lomond, 23 September 1961, Ivie & Gertsch (AMNH).
Entychides Simon, 1888
:
Entychides (Eutychides) arizonicus Gertsch & Wallace, 1936
♀ ♂: USA, Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal, AMNH south-western Research Station, 3 August 1976, S. Johnson (AMNH).
Neoapachella
gen. nov.:
Neoapachella rothi
sp. nov.: male HOLOTYPE, female paratype: USA, Apache Co., Greer, 1 mile south on west fork of the Little Colorado River, 29 August 1967, F. Coyle.
Apomastus
gen. nov.:
Apomastus schlingeri
sp. nov.: male HOLOTYPE, female paratype: USA, California, Los Angeles, Topanga Canyon, 18 September 1985, C.P. Kristensen (CAS).