Phaeoxantha (Phaeoxantha) nocturna nocturna ( Dejean, 1831 )

Moravec, Jiří & Dheurle, Charles, 2023, Taxonomic and nomenclatorial revision of the Neotropical genus Phaeoxantha Chaudoir (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae), Zootaxa 5386 (1), pp. 1-83 : 10-15

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5386.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5C0CC4-3D86-45BD-97FC-694A4E31A8B5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392280

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A28794-FFEF-FFC5-FF6E-95FF3BD79BC8

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Phaeoxantha (Phaeoxantha) nocturna nocturna ( Dejean, 1831 )
status

 

Phaeoxantha (Phaeoxantha) nocturna nocturna ( Dejean, 1831) View in CoL

( Figs 13–41 View FIGURES 13–17 View FIGURES 18–24 View FIGURES 25–31 View FIGURES 32–35 View FIGURES 36–41 ).

Megacephala nocturna Dejean, 1831: 263 View in CoL .

Phaeoxantha nocturna View in CoL : Chaudoir 1850: 7 (as “ nocturna Klug View in CoL ” and as a synonym of P. limata View in CoL ). Megacephala limata sensu auctorum (partim, see “Remarks” below).

Phaeoxantha limata sensu auctorum (partim, see “Remarks” below).

Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) nocturna View in CoL : Wiesner 1992: 45.

Phaeoxantha nocturna View in CoL : Naviaux 2008: 514 (513, figs 1–5).

Phaeoxantha nocturna View in CoL : Wiesner 2020: 31.

Unavailable names. Megacephala menetriesi : Dejean 1837: 2, in litt.

Megacephala brevicollis : Chaudoir 1865: 42, in litt.

Type locality. Brazil, environs of Pará.

Type material. Lectotype (designated here) ♂ in MHNH, labelled by small, square, plane green label (usually attached to type specimens by Dejean) and: “Muséum Paris / Coll. Chaudoir 1874” [greenish, printed, the date means when the specimens accessioned by MNHN] . Paralectotype. 1 ♂ in MHNH with same labels . Other five specimens with same labels in MNHN are obviously syntypes, thus becoming paralectotypes .

Other material examined. Historical specimens. 1 ♂ in ZSM [wrongly labelled as a holotype of in fact never described Megacephala limata Perty, 1830 ], labelled: “Amazon / F. / Perty” [large square tarnished label with thin green border, handwritten] // “ Holotypus / Megacephala / limata / Perty / 1830 / Staatssamml. München” [red, printed] // “ Phaeoxantha / nocturna ( Dejean, 1831) / R. Naviaux test. 2009 / Phaeoxantha ” [printed] // “SNSB-Zoolo-gische / Staatssammlung München / digital imaging / ZSM-COL–00114” [printed]. 1 ♂ in BMNH: “5302” // “Amazon / Bates” // “Fry Coll. / 1905–100” // NHMUK015009549”. Other data. 1 ♂ in CDCL: “Dr Hahnel/ Amazonas / (Staudinger)” // “ex coll. Bokor” // “ Megacephala / limata Perty’’. 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in CDCL: “Teffe / Amazon”. 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in CDCL: “Amazone” [green, handwritten] // “629/34” [small rounded, handwritten]. 1 ♂ in CDCL: “Amazone” [green, handwritten] // “629/34” [small, rounded, handwritten] // “ Tetracha laminata ” [handwritten]. 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in CDCL: “Brazilia, Amazonia, 120 km /N. of Manaus. Boa Vista road / Prai forest, sept. 20-30.89 / M. Hrabovsky lgt”. 2 ♀♀ in CDCL: “ Brazil, Amazonas / L. bank of Rio Negro / 8 km N. of Manaus/on beach, Oct. 6-89 / M. Hrabovsky col.” // “Meg.( Phaeoxantha ) / limata Perty, 1837 / Werner det. 1996.”. 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ in CCJM: “ Brazil, Amazonas / L. bank of Rio Negro / 8 km N. of Manaus/on white sand beach / 4.X.1989 M. Hrabovsky”. 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ in CCJM, 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ in CJVB: “Brasilia – Amazonia / Manaus – Rio Negro / 20.IX-14.X.1989 / M + P. Hrabovský leg”. 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ in CCJM, 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ in CJWB: “ Brazil – Amazonas, Manaus / Parque das Laranjarias / sandy at night 14.X.1993 / M. Hrabovský lgt.”. 1 ♂ in CJVB: “ Brazil, Amazonas / Parintins rd. to airport / white sand at night / 10.IX.1996, M. Hrabovsky lgt.”. 1 ♀ in CDCL: “ Brazil, Casares Mt / Praia de Carne / 16°05’43” S. 57°43’10’’W / leg Zerm, 22-IX- 998” // Phaeoxantha / limata/ Perty, 1830 / det J. Wiesner, 1998”. 1 ♀ in CDCL: “ Brazil, Rio Cuiaba / beach San Antonio / 15°52’19’’S. 56°05’36W / leg. Zerm. 17-IX-1998 ” // “ Phaeoxantha / limata / Perty, 1830 / det J.Wiesner, 1998”. 1 ♂ in CDCL “Ponta du Arare / Rio Negro, Bras.” // “Ca 50 km oberhalb / Manaus auf Sand -/ banken” // “21-11-62/ leg. Irmler” // “ Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) / limata Perty, 1830 / det J. Probst”. 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ in MHCP, 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in CCJM, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ in COSJ: “ Brasil / R. Preto da I Eva / 20.-25.XI.1994 / Hrdý M. lgt.”. 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in COSJ: “ Brasil /Amazone prov. / Rio Jalapu / I.1995, Gada lgt.”.

Differential diagnosis. Phaeoxantha (Phaeoxantha) nocturna nocturna is one of the four smallest species of the nominotypical subgenus with adults measuring 9.00–10.5 (LT 9.30) mm. It is immediately distinguished from similarly small (9–10 mm long) P. (P.) laminata by its almost subparallel, slightly posteriad attenuated elytra ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURES 13–17 , 18 View FIGURES 18–24 , 27–32, 34 View FIGURES 25–31 View FIGURES 32–35 )) (more notably so in males), in contrast to the ovoid, sexually dimorphic elytra with tuberculate surface in P. (P.) laminata ( Figs 98–100 View FIGURES 98–102 , 103–106, 111–114 View FIGURES 103–105 View FIGURES 106–112 View FIGURES 113–117 , 123–125 View FIGURES 118–126 ); the coloration varies from conspicuously pale, yellow-ochre with ochre to pale brownish, or brownish-darkened, or blackish elytral areas; elytral surface often appearing partly translucent, almost smooth, finely and mostly sparsely punctate, rarely with larger punctures,, appearing almost glabrous as covered with scattered or more dense but very short setae ( Figs 27–31 View FIGURES 25–31 , 34 View FIGURES 32–35 ); epipleura finely serrate; pronotal surface smooth and almost glabrous, or with sparse microsetae (in contrast to conspicuously more coarsely punctate and densely setose elytra and notably setose pronotum in P. (P.) n. crassipunctata ssp. nov.). Rather similar P. (P.) epipleuralis can be distinguished by its subparallel-side elytra with outer margins widest below the middle or slightly dilated posteriad, and by elytral punctures on anterior elytral half surrounded by shallow, fovea-like greyish circle ( Figs 86 View FIGURES 85–88 , 95–97 View FIGURES 95–97 ).

P. (P.) tremolerasi ( Figs 127–141 View FIGURES 127–130 View FIGURES 131–137 View FIGURES 138–141 ) is clearly distinguished by its larger body with notably stout elytra (in contrast to posteriad-attenuated elytra in P. (P.) n. nocturna and P. (P.) n. crassipunctata). Moreover, elytral surface in P. (P.) tremolerasi is distinctly and rather densely punctate in their anterior half ( Figs 130 View FIGURES 127–130 , 139–141 View FIGURES 138–141 ) and outer elytral margins lack any serrulation (which is present in other species of the nominotypical subgenus). P. (P.) cruciata and P. (P.). bifasciata immediately differ in their much larger size.

Remarks. Naviaux (2008) supposed that no type specimen of Megacephala nocturna Dejean, 1831 was preserved. However, seven specimens, obviously syntypes of this taxon, were found in MNHN recently, two males presented here, one of them designated as a lectotype ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13–17 ), the other as a paralectotype ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13–17 ), the remaining five syntypes in MNHN becoming paralectotypes. Because Dejean and Chaudoir did not label type specimens with locality or type labels, Rivalier, who arranged the boxes of the General Collection of MNHN in 1970, failed to recognize the specimens as syntypes of M. nocturna . He shifted the specimens into the newly arranged box and placed them under the label “ limata Perty ”. Fortunately, most of Dejean’s types are recognizable by a specific shape of pins, and particularly by a small, square plain green label ( Figs 15, 17 View FIGURES 13–17 ) attached to the specimens (see also Moravec 2010: 18, 2018, 2020). All these latent syntypes were subsequently (after the Dejean-Chaudoir collection was accessioned as part of the MNHN collection) labelled by curators with large greenish printed labels “Muséum Paris / Coll. Chaudoir 1874”; fortunately, due to these labels, Rivalier arranged them alongside in the first line of the series in the MNHN box.

For a rather detailed description of this species see Dejean (1831) and more specified redescription by Naviaux (2008). Nevertheless, the male ZSM specimen ( Fig 32 View FIGURES 32–35 ), wrongly labelled as a “ holotype of Megacephala limata ” was inappropriately considered by Naviaux (2008) as a juvenile adult. It cannot be true also due to the well-developed aedeagus (obvious in Fig. 32 View FIGURES 32–35 near right protarsus) and elytral black areas of the male, because juvenile adults (also examined) are entirely pale-translucent, with only indicated ochre-brownish darkened posterior area, and their aedeagi are translucent and deformed due to their more or less distinctly collapsed membrane.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae

Tribe

Megacephalini

Genus

Phaeoxantha

SubGenus

Phaeoxantha

Loc

Phaeoxantha (Phaeoxantha) nocturna nocturna ( Dejean, 1831 )

Moravec, Jiří & Dheurle, Charles 2023
2023
Loc

Phaeoxantha nocturna

Wiesner, J. 2020: 31
2020
Loc

Phaeoxantha nocturna

Naviaux, R. 2008: 514
2008
Loc

Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) nocturna

Wiesner, J. 1992: 45
1992
Loc

Megacephala brevicollis

Chaudoir, M. 1865: 42
1865
Loc

Phaeoxantha nocturna

Chaudoir, M. 1850: 7
1850
Loc

Megacephala nocturna

Dejean, P. M. F. A. 1831: 263
1831
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF