Phaeoxantha (Euphaeoxantha) bucephala (W. Horn, 1909)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5386.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5C0CC4-3D86-45BD-97FC-694A4E31A8B5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392302 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A28794-FFD9-FFF4-FF6E-95FF3D8D9A45 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phaeoxantha (Euphaeoxantha) bucephala (W. Horn, 1909) |
status |
|
Phaeoxantha (Euphaeoxantha) bucephala (W. Horn, 1909) View in CoL
( Figs 270–282 View FIGURES 270–273 View FIGURES 274–282 )
Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) bucephala W. Horn, 1909b: 284–286 View in CoL , pl. 9, fig. 12.
Phaeoxantha bucephala View in CoL : Horn 1921: 149–150.
Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) bucephala View in CoL : Wiesner 1992: 45
Phaeoxantha bucephala View in CoL : Cassola & Pearson 2001: 11.
Phaeoxantha bucephala View in CoL : Wiesner 2020: 30.
Type locality. Argentina: Santiago del Estero .
Type material. Lectotype (designated here) ♂ in SDEI labelled: “ Argentinien ” [printed] / “ Santiago del Estero ” [handwritten] // “Steinbach / Moser” [handwritten] // “Dtsch. Entomol. / Institut Berlin” [printed] // “ Megacephala / bucephala W. H. ” [handwritten] // “Type! / coll. W. Horn ” [printed] // “ Syntypus ” [red, printed] // “ Coll. W. Horn / DEI Eberswalde” [printed] // “bucephala / mihi” [large, greenish collection label with black frame] // “ SDEI coleoptera / # 302350” [printed] . Paralectotype. 1 ♀ in SDEI with same label data except for: “ SDEI coleoptera / # 302351” .
Other material examined. 1 ♂ in CCJM (ex JWCW): “ Paraguay Est. Agropil / dep. Boqueron / Rio Pilcomayo / 21.X.1990, U. Drechsel leg.” . 1 ♂, 1 ♀ in COSJ , 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ in CCJM (ex COSJ): “ Bolivia – Santa Cruz depart./ N. Camiri, dry river ground / 18°59´43´´S, 63°31´50´´W / 20.I. 2020, 500 m / O Šafránek et M. Amaya lgt.” GoogleMaps
Differential diagnosis. Adults of Phaeoxantha (P.) bucephala are 20–25.3 (LT 25.2) mm long, 8.00–10.3 (LT 10.2) mm wide. The species is immediately recognizable due to its elytra ( Figs 270–271 View FIGURES 270–273 , 281, 282 View FIGURES 274–282 ), which are almost uniformly oval-shaped in both sexes yet wider and notably stout in male (widest below middle), but never distinctly dilated posteriad as in males of the following three species. First three protarsomeres in male ( Fig. 278 View FIGURES 274–282 ) only slightly dilated (unique character within the genus). Male mandibles ( Figs 273–274 View FIGURES 270–273 View FIGURES 274–282 ) distinctly aberrant-shaped, usually with only three teeth (and basal molar) with terminal teeth notably short, wide and abruptly pointed (in most examined males the teeth are more or less worn or broken); second tooth in right mandible tightly appressed to the terminal tooth, third tooth notably distant from second, fourth tooth missing (in LT developed but anomalously placed inward the mandible – Fig. 273 View FIGURES 270–273 ); female mandibles ( Fig. 275 View FIGURES 274–282 ) normally shaped and with four teeth (fourth tooth tiny), yet distinctly asymmetrical: third tooth in right mandible acute and notably longer than second tooth. Pronotum ( Fig. 279 View FIGURES 274–282 ) distinctly trapezoid, posterior lobe markedly narrower than anterior lobe and disc; discal surface indistinctly coriaceous wrinkled in middle, appearing glabrous. Aedeagus ( Fig. 280 View FIGURES 274–282 ) comparatively short, length 5.30 mm, widest in middle, width 1.00– 1.05 mm).
Distribution. Obviously occurring in a large area of the Rio de la Plata Basin, known from Argentina and Paraguay, but also from southern Bolivia, as summarized by Wiesner (2020), who listed it also from south-western Brazil, and from Argentinean provinces of Chaco, Formosa, Jujuy, Salta, Santiago del Estero (type locality) and Tucumán (previously by Wiesner & Bandinelli 2014). Examined specimens from the Bolivian department of Santa Cruz were taken on bed of a dry river; other Bolivian records are from rather smaller river beds in semi-humid Tucuman forest near the town of Camiri (Ondřej Šafránek, pers. com.). Person et al. (1999a) listed a number of records from the Bolivian departments of Santa Cruz and Tarija (Gran Chaco). For the ecology and biology, including developmental stages, see Zerm & Adis (2001a, b, c).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Megacephalini |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Phaeoxantha |
Phaeoxantha (Euphaeoxantha) bucephala (W. Horn, 1909)
Moravec, Jiří & Dheurle, Charles 2023 |
Phaeoxantha bucephala
Wiesner, J. 2020: 30 |
Phaeoxantha bucephala
Cassola, F. & Pearson, D. 2001: 11 |
Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) bucephala
Wiesner, J. 1992: 45 |
Phaeoxantha bucephala
Horn, W. 1921: 149 |
Megacephala (Phaeoxantha) bucephala W. Horn, 1909b: 284–286
Horn, W. 1909: 286 |