Pitarinae (Keen, 1951)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac047 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:73CBB6F1-25E1-42FD-9411-AB8FE69BEFA5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7036997 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A0DE60-FFA7-FF9B-73CB-6977DCC3FA67 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pitarinae |
status |
|
Pelecyora Dall, 1902 has always been placed in Dosiniinae ( Jukes-Browne, 1908; Fischer-Piette & Delmas, 1967; Zhuang, 2001; Huber, 2010), but Xu et al. (2008) included it in Pitarinae . We examined the shells and found three conchological distinctions between Pelecyora [represented by Pelecyora trigona (Reeve, 1850) ], Pitarinae [represented by Pitar striatum (Gray, 1838) ] and Dosiniinae [represented by Dosinia biscocta (Reeve, 1850) ]: the type of the anterior lateral tooth in the LV, the height of the umbo and inflation of the lunule ( Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ). Both Pelecyora trigona and Pitar striatum have an anterior lateral tooth that is not aligned with the anterior cardinal tooth ( Fig. 10E, F View Figure 10 ), in addition to a higher umbo ( Fig. 10E, F View Figure 10 ) and a lunule that is flush with the main body of the shell ( Fig. 10H, I View Figure 10 ). In Dosinia biscocta , the anterior lateral tooth is aligned with the anterior cardinal tooth ( Fig. 10D View Figure 10 ), while the umbo is lower ( Fig. 10D View Figure 10 ) and the lunule is impressed below the level of the main body of the shell ( Fig. 10G View Figure 10 ). Nevertheless, the phylogenetic results based on multigene fragments show that Pelecyora is basal in clade B1, Pitarinae is in clade B1 and Dosiniinae is clustered in clade A ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ). Consequently, we suggest placing Pelecyora in Pitarinae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.