Heleodromia (Heleodromia) immaculata Haliday
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3746.3.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:30BA4C3A-314E-4DB1-8118-9315A4EFD204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6146704 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A087F1-7966-9D3F-E1D3-D7C3FE48FB5E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Heleodromia (Heleodromia) immaculata Haliday |
status |
|
Heleodromia (Heleodromia) immaculata Haliday View in CoL
Heleodromia immaculata Haliday, 1833: 159 . Type-locality: Ireland: Holywood, Downshire.
Microcera rostrata Zetterstedt, 1838: 572 . Type-locality: “in Scandinavia präsertum borealis”. Hemerodromia fuscipennis Roser, 1840: 53 . Type-locality: not given [ Germany: Württemberg].
Diagnosis. Epandrial lobe bifurcated with short thick anterior process and long finger-like posterior process; surstylus strongly curved forward. Legs black except extreme tips of all femora brownish. Fore femur with distinct av shorter than femur thickness.
Material examined. CHINA. Tibet: 1 ♂, Linzhi, Sejilashankouxi (N29°33′65′′, E94°33′81′′), 3789 m, 2012. VIII.15–18 (Malaise trap, Zeqing Niu, Huanxi Cao & Qingtao Wu, leg.).
Distribution. China (Neimenggu, Tibet); Europe, Russia (Sinclair et al. 2011).
Remarks. For descriptions and illustrations of this species, see Engel (1939), Collin (1961), Wagner (1985), and Liu et al. (2012).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |