Euidothrips Ananthakrishnan
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.200097 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6200698 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039E87FF-5501-7B29-D9D9-FF12CCCCFBD6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euidothrips Ananthakrishnan |
status |
|
Genus Euidothrips Ananthakrishnan View in CoL
Euidothrips Ananthakrishnan, 1967: 118 View in CoL ; Wilson, 1975: 115. Type species: E. apsarus Ananthakrishnan View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy.
Diagnosis. Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) strongly reticulate, with raised reticulation between compound eyes, cheeks slightly rounded, constricted just behind compound eyes and at base; mouth-cone slightly pointed at apex, with 2- segmented maxillary palpi. Antennae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B, C) 8-segmented, segments III to VI weakly annulated but without microtrichia, III flared at base and narrowed near base, and more or less asymmetric, III and IV each with a Ushaped sensorium much elongate beneath the next segment.
Pronotum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) reticulate, without major setae. Mesonotum ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D) with median longitudinal division incomplete. Metascutum ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D) with median raised large triangular area reticulate; median pair of setae behind middle. Fore wing narrowed in distal two-thirds, veinal setae minute, microtrichia scattered and rough. Tarsi 1- or 2-segmented.
Abdominal tergites ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E, D) at least lateral to median setae with posteromarginal craspedum, median pair of setae closer to each other than their length; distinctly reticulate except submedian area on tergites I to V (or VII); tergite IX with pair of fimbriate S1 setae, each arising from a tubercle; tergite X with median longitudinal slit complete; sternites ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F) reticulate, sternites II to VII with two to four (or five) pairs of posteromarginal setae, with or without discal setae. Ovipositor developed.
Comments. Mound et al. (2001) indicated relationships among 31 genera of the Panchaetothripinae based on cladistic analysis using morphological characters, although the relationships were weakly supported. This analysis indicated that Euidothrips was sister to Moundothrips + Phibalothrips and this small clade was sister-group to Parthenothrips + Arachisothrips within a large clade including Heliothrips , Retithrips , Australothrips and Rhipipholothrips.
Euidothrips is most similar to Phibalothrips , but in the latter genus the body is more slender and antennal segments III and IV have simple sensoria, also the fore wing has no anteromarginal fringes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Panchaetothripinae |
Euidothrips Ananthakrishnan
Masumoto, Masami & Okajima, Shûji 2010 |
Euidothrips
Wilson 1975: 115 |
Ananthakrishnan 1967: 118 |