Dictyonema cf. delicatulum Lapworth, 1881
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1387 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039E87A3-F934-FFA3-735B-44A399D4E407 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dictyonema cf. delicatulum Lapworth, 1881 |
status |
|
Dictyonema cf. delicatulum Lapworth, 1881
Figs. 5G, 6C View Fig
cf. 1881. Dictyonema delicatulum Lapworth ; Lapworth, p. 172, pl.
7, fig. 2a,b. cf. 1928. Dictyonema delicatulum, Lapworth , emend.; Bulman, p.
51–52, pl. 6, figs. 7–11.
Material. AM F114648a, AM F114749 and AM F114769– 71, all from F14, Bridge Creek.
Description. The best-preserved rectangular fragment of rhabdosome embraces eight stipes with several branching points, and measures 4× 8 mm. Stipe spacing is about 20 in 10 mm, dissepiments (which are conspicuous) 14–18 in 10 mm, and the autothecal spacing 20–25 in 10 mm.
Dissepiments vary from quite thread-like to a width of 0.10 mm, and are mostly disposed at right angle to the stipes. The lateral stipe width is 0.20–0.30 mm, but the dorsoventral stipe width cannot be measured in the absence of profile stipe views. There is, however, a suggestion of the autothecae, enabling a rough measurement, but the exact nature of the autothecal apertures cannot be ascertained, although one specimen ( AM F114769 ) does show thecae with a long ventral denticle or spine .
Remarks. The material closely matches Bulman’s (1928) redescription of the species, differing only in the dissepimental spacing (14–18 in 10 mm in the Australian specimens, compared with 10–12 in 10 mm in European specimens). We are, however, unsure of the exact nature of the autothecal apparatuses in our material, having established only that they are denticulate.
AM |
Australian Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.