Unionicola (Hexatax) nearctica Crowell & Davids, 1979
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F11C5EFE-8B45-4F58-B7E9-741D27EB47B6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5733730 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039E1C1E-FFAE-FF9B-FF62-B33EFE383661 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Unionicola (Hexatax) nearctica Crowell & Davids, 1979 |
status |
|
Unionicola (Hexatax) nearctica Crowell & Davids, 1979
Report associated with sponges: This species was reported as sponge-associated mite in the Laurentian Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basins, North America ( Crowell & Davids 1979). This species was mentioned by Crowell (1990) as developmentally associated with freshwater sponges in the Northern Hemisphere. This species was also mentioned under possible ‘sponge-mite’ species in North America ( Vidrine 1996; Edwards & Vidrine 2013).
Remarks: This species belongs to ‘ U. crassipes —complex’. It needs further study (emphasizing on developmental study) of this mite to get better idea about association with freshwater sponges. Crowell & Davids (1979) stated “The distinctiveness of the North American U. crassipes- like mites makes it necessary to re-evaluate the records of those mites. The mites reported by Conroy (1974) were undoubtedly U. nearctica ”. [The paper presented by Conroy (1974) in IV International congress of Acarologie,Saalfelden, Austria, 1974 was published as Proceedings in 1979 and referred as Conroy, J.C. (1979)]. Crowell & Davids (1979) also commented: “The records of Wolcott (1899) and materials in the Ruth Marshall Collection appear to be a mixture of U. laurentiana and U. nearctica ”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |