Anthelephila antennalis, Kejval, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0015 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B538C51C-71A3-467A-9423-54B69A204CF4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5062458 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039DB067-FFD4-FFD8-FE87-55C4FD79FBBD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anthelephila antennalis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anthelephila antennalis sp. nov.
( Figs 1–4 View Figs 1–4 )
Formicomus dubius View in CoL (misidentification): UHMANN (1994): 668 (specimens from Malaysia: Perak)
Type locality. Malaysia, Pahang, 15 km E of Kampung Dong, 3°53′N 102°01′E, Benom Mountains, altitude 700 m.
Type material. HOLOTYPE: ♂, ‘ MALAYSIA, Benom Mts., 15 km E Kampong Dong, 3.53N 102.01E, 700 m, 1.iv.1998, D. Hauck lgt. [p]’ ( NMPC). GoogleMaps PARATYPES: 6♂♂ 5♀♀, same data as holotype ( ZKDC, NMPC); GoogleMaps 96 ♂♂ 58♀♀, ‘ MALAYSIA; Benom Mts. , 15 km E Kampong Dong; 700 m 3,53N 102,01E; 1.iv.1998; Dembický & Pacholátko leg. [p]’ ( NHMB, ZKDC, DCDC); GoogleMaps 1 ♂, ‘W MALAYSIA – Pahang Banjaran Bnom Mts . 20 km S of Kampong Ulu Dong, 17-23.iv.1997, 1500-1900 m, P. Čechovský leg. [p; sic!]’ ( ZKDC); 6 ♂♂ 1 ♀, ‘ MALAYSIA W Cameron Highlands , RINGLET env., 15.iv.2000, M. Snížek leg. [p]’ ( ZKDC); 2 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀, ‘ Malaysia: Perak Bukit Baring Gerik, 800–900 m 8.2.1991 P. Schwendinge [p; P. Schwendinger lgt.] // Formicomus dubius Krekich det. G. Uhmann 1993 [p+h]’ ( MHNG, ZSMC).
Additional material examined. MALAYSIA: KELANTAN: 1 ♀, Kampong Raja env. , 10.–16.iv.1999, V. Kabourek lgt. ( ZKDC). PAHANG: 1♀, Cameron Highlands, Tanah Rata env. , 1600 m, 23.–31.vii.1993, R. Schuh lgt. ( ZKDC). PERAK: 1 ♀, W Perak , Cameron Highlands , Ringlet , 800–1000 m, P. Pacholátko lgt. ( ZKDC).
Description. Male (holotype). Body length 4.5 mm. Body black, unicolorous; antennae and legs brownish-black.
Head 1.2 times as long as wide, somewhat angled postero-medially (widely parabolic), distinctly differentiated from short neck; tempora strongly narrowing posteriad, posterior angles absent. Eyes medium-sized, rather convex. Dorsal surface glossy, distinctly unevenly punctate; punctures coarser, umbiliform anteriorly, delicate and sparser basally, distinctly separated. Setation subdecumbent; scattered longer tactile setae. Antennae only moderately enlarged in terminal third; antennomere I 2.2 times, X twice, XI 4.6 times as long as wide.
Pronotum 1.5 times as long as wide, distinctly narrower than head including eyes, nearly evenly rounded anteriorly, strongly narrowed and impressed (constricted) postero-laterally in dorsal view; pronotal disc somewhat flattened medially, nearly evenly moderately convex in lateral view. Surface smooth and glossy; disc punctate, similarly as head, with some transverse wrinkles in front of smooth antebasal area; lateral sides largely impunctate, postero-lateral impressions wrinkled and adjacent dorso- lateral surface rugose. Setation as on head.
Mesoventrite with slight indication of simple, moderately wide, median longitudinal bulge, at most slightly convex in lateral view, narrowed and with several long, coarse setae in median line posteriorly; metaventrite simple.
Elytra 1.7 times as long as wide, conjointly rounded apically; humeri distinct, postscutellar impression at most very slightly indicated. Surface glossy, distinctly punctate; punctation double, evenly developed, setiferous punctures widely separated. Setation uniform, longer and more raised than on head, decumbent; numerous erect tactile setae.
Metathoracic wings developed.
Fore legs modified ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ); profemoral process weakly developed; protibiae distinctly angled on inner side at about mid-length; all tibiae with two terminal spurs; penultimate tarsomere widened/flattened distally, with terminal tarsomere articulated dorsally near base for all tarsi.
Abdominal sternum VII ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–4 ) widely emarginate and somewhat sinuous postero-medially. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–4 ); paired prongs elongate, slender, with several lobules on dorsal side, and conspicuously long and coarse setae laterally in basal half. Tergum VII narrowly rounded and slightly emarginate apically. Tergite VIII forming a pair of sclerites, narrowly connected medially, narrowly rounded apically. Apical sclerite of segment IX inconspicuous. Aedeagus ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–4 ); apical portion of tegmen 0.3 times as long as basal-piece, bilobed apically.
Female. Externally differing from male as follows: fore legs quite simple; shorter antennae (XI 3.3 times as long as wide); abdominal sternum VII simple, moderately angled apically; tergum VII subtriangular, with slightly produced, narrowly rounded apex.
Variation. Body length (♂ ♀) 3.3–4.5 mm.
Differential diagnosis. Anthelephila antennalis sp. nov. is close to A. utara sp. nov., but differs in many details of male characters, e.g. more elongate terminal antennomere, slight profemoral process, more prominent protrusion of metatibiae (situated at mid-length), emarginate posterior margin of sternum VII, scantily setose apical portion of paired prongs, and longer and slender apical lobes of tegmen.
Remarks. Some paratypes were previously identified as Formicomus dubius Krekich-Strassoldo, 1929 and recorded as such by UHMANN (1994).
Etymology. Named in reference to the extremely elongate terminal antennomeres in males; adjective.
Distribution. Malaysia (Kelantan, Pahang, Perak).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anthelephila antennalis
Kejval, Zbyněk 2019 |
Formicomus dubius
UHMANN G. 1994: 668 |