Chilocoris alienus Horváth
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.206103 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6182562 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039CCB09-FFEE-9D2A-439A-7050902AE9B0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chilocoris alienus Horváth |
status |
|
( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11–14 View FIGURES 11 – 14 , 31–33 View FIGURES 31 – 42 )
Chilocoris piceus non Signoret: Horváth, 1889: 327. Chilocoris alienus Horváth, 1919: 255 .
Diagnosis. Total length 3.7–3.8; total width 2.0–2.2. Coloration brownish. Body dorsum almost uniformly covered with dense punctures, except calli and posterior border of pronotum with weakened punctuation ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ) with long pegs submarginally; arrangement of paraclypeal secondary setae, in order from mesalmost to lateralmost: 3 pegs - 1 hair - 2 pegs - 1 hair - 2 peg. Ocular index 4.0–4.5. Antennal segment III 2.0–2.3× as long as II. Pronotum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ) ca. 2.0× as wide as long, with 6–8 setae on lateral submargin and 1 seta on lateral part of anterior submarginal line, in each side. Peritreme bulbously enlarged apically, and median furrow not invading this enlargement ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ).
This species resembles C. brunneus Lis , C. minor Hsiao , or C. nepalensis Lis in general appearance. However, it can be distinguished from these species by body size and chaetotaxy (see Lis 1994). In addition, descriptions and detailed illustrations of the structures of the male terminalia showed obvious differences from the three species mentioned above.
3 terminalia —Pygophore simple, without prominent ventro-posterior margin; posterior surface moderately covered with thin hairs; lateral infoldings of opening curved and produced toward pygophoral lumen; median projection rounded apically. Phallus ( Figs. 11–14 View FIGURES 11 – 14 ) relatively large; endosoma peaked apically, with curved, gradually tapered sclerotized band on each side distal to conjunctival appendage ( Figs. 13–14 View FIGURES 11 – 14 ); conjunctival appendage 3- lobed, more or less reflect in inflated position, and ventral 2 lobes slightly sclerotized; endophallic duct relatively thin, weakly sclerotized, coiled 4 times from its turning point, and protruding from dorsum ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11 – 14 ). Paramere ( Figs. 31–33 View FIGURES 31 – 42 ) distinctly broadened around distal 1/3; hypophysis well hooked and sharpened.
Specimens examined. 231Ƥ—RUSSIA: “Sibiria or. Wladiwostok”: 13, “ LECTOTYPE Chilocoris alienus Horv. labeled by Froeschner ’59” (HNHM); 1Ƥ, Paralectotype (HNHM). CHINA: “[S. Manchuria] Antô” (=Dandong, Liaoning): 13, 15.iii.1933, R. Kikuchi leg. ( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11–14 View FIGURES 11 – 14 , 31–33 View FIGURES 31 – 42 ) (ELKU).
Distribution. Russia: Far East; China: Liaoning.
New to China; the first representative of the genus from the northern China.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chilocoris alienus Horváth
Imura, Jimpei 2011 |
Chilocoris piceus
Horvath 1919: 255 |
Horvath 1889: 327 |