Munidopsis villosa Faxon, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4021.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F12128F6-C542-4FBE-9ACF-414C96D93C6F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5030601 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B3B0C-FFF5-FF86-FF48-FBDAE1729AED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Munidopsis villosa Faxon, 1893 |
status |
|
Munidopsis villosa Faxon, 1893
( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 )
Restricted synonymy:
Munidopsis villosa Faxon, 1893: 182 .— Luke, 1977: 28 (list).— Wicksten, 1989: 316.— Baba, 2005: 197 –197, 299, fig. 93. Munidopsis villosa chilensis Bahamonde, 1964: 162 , pl. 1, fig. C, D.
Type locality. Gulf of Panama (07°21.00'N, 79°35.00'W, 935 m).
Other records. Arica ( Luke 1977) off Algarrobo (32°20’S – 71°40’W), Chile ( Bahamonde 1964; as M. villosa chilensis ).
Distributional range. Gulf of Panama and off Arica, Chile ( Luke 1977); Off Algarrobo ( Bahamonde 1964).
Bathymetric range. 800–1773 m.
Material examined. Paratype ( MNHNS 10064).
Description. Rostrum triangular ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 a), 3–4 times carapace length. Carapace subrectangular, covered with scale-like tubercles; antennal spine short, not reaching base of antennular peduncle; anterolateral spine robust but short, barely projecting ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 a); gastric region with 2 spines and 2 minor pairs near to margin of region ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 a); dorsal surface flat, no prominent regions; cervical groove shallow; posterior margin unarmed ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 b). Second to fifth abdominal somites with acute, short median spine; pleura unarmed ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 b). Cheliped short, covered by tubercles, without spines; palm longer than wide; fixed finger almost as long as palm; dactyl unarmed ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 c). Walking legs short, almost one and one quarter carapace length ( Fig 10 View FIGURE 10 d). Telson divided in ten plates ( Fig 10 View FIGURE 10 e).
Remarks. We compared the paratype in the MNHNS from Santiago with M. villosa from the collection of the Marine Biology Department of the Panama University (Catalog number 670), and no differences between both specimens were observed.
As was noted by Baba (2005) the figure in Retamal (1981) is not M. villosa chilensis , because of the absence of epigastric and other dorsal spines, and the presence of dorsal marginal spines on the merus of P2–4. No specimens of this species were found in the collections of the MZUC. The figure in Retamal (1981) was probably drawn from the plate of Bahamonde’s paper. No other records of material are known apart from the original descriptions.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Munidopsis villosa Faxon, 1893
Guzman, Guillermo L. & Sellanes, Javier 2015 |
Munidopsis villosa
Baba 2005: 197 |
Wicksten 1989: 316 |
Luke 1977: 28 |
Bahamonde 1964: 162 |
Faxon 1893: 182 |