Metopia fofo, Carvalho-Filho & Gorayeb & Soares & Souza, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4504.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4F4A4FC-2AD0-4438-91D4-BB690C91A5A2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5968090 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A5520-B33B-DB28-4EA0-F8DD2BB1F83F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metopia fofo |
status |
sp. nov. |
Metopia fofo View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 22–26 View FIGURES 22–26 )
Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ ( MPEG), labeled as follows: BRASIL-PARÁ, BR-422 / Km 11, sul de Cametá [=
south of Cametá City], Campina [= white-sand vegetation] / 2°15’12”S 49°36’12”W / Arm. Suspensa [= suspended trap], 0 5 a [= to] 20.vii.2015 [printed on white label] // BRASIL-PARÁ, Cametá/ Cols: [= collectors] F.S. Carvalho Fh., B.F. dos Anjos, L./ A. Quaresma, D.R. Guimarães/ 0 5 a [= to] 20.xi.2015 [printed on white label; holotype with left fore leg and right mid leg missing, and with segment 5 of abdomen and terminalia cleared and placed in glycerin in a microvial pinned beneath the specimen].
Diagnosis. Palpus black and reduced to stubs. Male fore tarsomeres 3–5 with elongate hair-like setae dorsally ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Veins R 1 and CuA 1 bare. Pregonite elongate and narrow, with pointed apex ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Phallus elongate and gently curved ventrally ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Acrophallus elongate and without spines ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ).
Description. Male. Body length: 4.6 mm (n = 1).
Head. Frons distinctly protruding giving the head a trapezoidal profile. Fronto-orbital and parafacial plates covered with silver microtrichia. Fronto-orbital plate with some small scattered setulae in addition to 9 frontal setae continuing on to parafacial plate to below level of aristal insertion in lateral view. Frontal vitta black, narrowing towards lunule. Inner vertical setae differentiated, outer vertical setae developed [but both broken]. Ocellar setae of about the same length as frontal setae; 2 reclinate and 2 proclinate fronto-orbital setae arranged in partly overlapping rows with anterior reclinate orbital seta positioned anterior to posterior proclinate seta (see Pape & Dahlem 2010: fig. 6). Antenna dark brown, first flagellomere with gray microtrichia; arista thickened in proximal half and as long as first flagellomere. Palpus black, reduced to a rudimentary stub.
Thorax. Black, with silvery microtrichia. Chaetotaxy: acrostichals 0+1, dorsocentrals 2+3, intra-alars 1+2, supra-alars 2+3, postpronotals 2, postalars 2, notopleurals 2, anepisternals 4–5, katepisternals 3, merals 10, scutellum with 1 pair of basal setae, 1 pair of lateral setae, 1 pair of apical setae and no discal setae. Legs. Fore femur with row of setae on posterodorsal and posteroventral surfaces. Fore tarsomere 3 with two long, hair-like setae dorsally ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Fore tarsomere 4 with one long, hair-like seta dorsally ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Fore tarsomere 5 with one long dorsally seta ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Mid tibia without anterodorsal and anteroventral setae. Hind femur with row of setae on posterodorsal and posteroventral surfaces. Wing. Hyaline. Tegula dark brown. Basicosta yellowish. Vein R 1 bare. Vein R 4+5 with setae dorsally. Vein CuA 1 bare. Costal spine not differentiated. Third costal section without ventral setae.
Abdomen. Black with silvery-gray microtrichia in about anterior half of each tergite. Microtrichia on tergites 3 and 4 interrupted by a median black stripe. Syntergite 1+2 without marginal setae. Tergites 3 and 4 with a pair of median marginal setae. Tergite 5 with a row of marginal setae. Terminalia. Tergite 6, syntergosternite 7+8 and epandrium brown. Cercus dark brown, shorter than epandrium in lateral view, with distal portion abruptly narrowing towards apex in lateral view ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Basal portion of cercus covered with many long setae ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Ventral margin of cercal prong slightly curved; cercal apex rounded ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Cercal prongs, in dorsal view, narrow and parallel ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Surstylus dark brown, about half the length of cercus, with distal half narrowing toward apex and curved dorsally; with microtrichia restricted to basal half ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Pregonite elongate, longer than postgonite, narrowed and curved ventrally ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Postgonite longer than wide, with a long pre-apical seta and a row of small setae along ventral margin ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Phallus elongate, gently curved ventrally, with ventral and dorsal plates well developed ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Distiphallus with a distinct ventral swelling, with many membranous cuticular spines ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ). Acrophallus elongate and rounded apically, with some wrinkles and without cuticular spines ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ).
Female. Unknown.
Remarks. Metopia fofo sp. nov. runs to Metopia krombeini Sabrosky in the most recent key to the American species of Metopia Meigen ( Pape 1987a), but differs from this species in having phallus gently curved ventrally ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ), acrophallus without spines and rounded apically ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–26 ), and cercal prong narrowed in dorsal view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–26 ). In M. krombeini the phallus is almost straight, the acrophallus has small cuticular spines and is subrectangular apically, and the cercal prong has an enlarged base and narrow tip ( Pape 1987a: figs 27, 30, 33). The phallus of M. fofo sp. nov. is very similar to that of M. lateropili Allen , since both share a distinct ventral swelling with many membranous cuticular spines. Metopia lateropili differs from M. fofo sp. nov. in having palpus elongate, not reduced to a stub.
Distribution. NEOTROPICAL—Brazil (Pará).
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the word “fofó”, which is a famous popular festival that takes place before the carnival in the streets of Cametá (the type-locality).
MPEG |
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |