Sparianthina rufescens ( Mello-Leitão, 1940 ), Jaeger & Rheims & Labarque, 2009

Jaeger, Peter, Rheims, Cristina & Labarque, Facundo, 2009, On the huntsman spider genera Sparianthina Banks, 1929 and Anaptomecus Simon, 1903 from South and Central America (Araneae, Sparassidae), ZooKeys 16 (16), pp. 115-147 : 125-127

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.16.236

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1DBBDBA2-6036-4675-984F-E640BC2A1575

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3791896

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787A5-FFE5-730D-6ED0-2F63FE34FA05

treatment provided by

Plazi (2020-04-27 07:55:01, last updated 2024-11-29 15:58:40)

scientific name

Sparianthina rufescens ( Mello-Leitão, 1940 )
status

comb. nov.

Sparianthina rufescens ( Mello-Leitão, 1940) View in CoL comb. n.

Figs 34-49 View Figures 34-45 View Figures 46-49

Anaptomecus rufescens Mello-Leitão, 1940: 180 , fig. 8-9 (description ♀; holotype ♀ [PJ 1662], Guyana, Essequibo River [6°21’53.25”N, 58°37’52.36”W], 1930.1164, No. 3491, A.W. Richards (c.), Oxford University Expedition K.B.G., NHM, examined). Roewer 1954: 712. Platnick 2009.

Notes. Mello-Leitão (1940: 181) listed “type no. 2491”. Although the label shows “3941” it is considered the holotype female according to the match of other data. A juvenile (PJ 1663) apparently of the same species was in the same vial, as well as one male Salticidae View in CoL . The juvenile is not considered to be a syntype, as Mello-Leitão wrote “type” in singular.

Further material examined. GUYANA. 1 ♁ ( PJ 1665 ), Guest , Maraballi River , Essequibo River , 15 miles above Bartica, Bottle I, No. 68, 1.II.[19]29, R.W.G. Hingston, Mello-Leitão det. ( NHM 1930.4.15.48) ; 1 ♀ ( PJ 1664 ), Guest , Maraballi River , Essequibo River , 15 miles above Bartica, Bottle I, No. 65, 29.X.[19]29, R.W.G. Hingston, Mello-Leitão det. ( NHM 1930.4.15.45) ; 2 ♀♀, Essequibo River , opposite Twasinki Mts. 25.IX.1937, W.G. Hassler ( AMNH) ; 1 ♀, Parish , 1913 ( AMNH) ; 1 ♀, Kangarooma , 13.VI.1911, F.E. Lutz ( AMNH). 1 ♀ ( PJ 1878 ), Bovallius leg. ( NHRS) .

Diagnosis. Males: embolus widened; DTA pointing retrolaterally in ventral view; RTA with three appendages, dorsal one stiletto-like and slightly bent, median one finger-shaped and ventral one roughly triangular ( Figs 34-37 View Figures 34-45 ). Females: epigynal furrows present in the posterior part of epigyne, running diagonally from median to antero-laterally, bent at their anterior end ( Figs 40-41 View Figures 34-45 , 46 View Figures 46-49 ). Fertilisation ducts situated in the centre of the internal duct system; glandular appendages long and conspicuous, pointing in an anterior direction, diverging ( Figs 42 View Figures 34-45 , 48-49 View Figures 46-49 ).

Description. Male (NHM). Total length 5.9. Prosoma: 3.2 long. Opisthosoma: 2.7 long. Chelicerae with 3 anterior and 4 posterior teeth, and with ca. 20 denticles in a row ( Fig. 38 View Figures 34-45 ).

Palp as in diagnosis. Embolus and conductor arising from tegulum at 9- to 9:30-o’clock-position ( Fig. 35 View Figures 34-45 ).

Redescription. Female (AMNH). Total length 8.5. Prosoma: 3.5 long, 3.3 wide. Opisthosoma: 4.8 long, 3.0 wide. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.18, ALE 0.24, PME 0.18, PLE 0.24, AME–AME 0.12, AME–ALE 0.06, PME–PME 0.24, PME–PLE 0.26, AME–PME 0.26, ALE–PLE 0.22. Legs: I: femur 4.0, patella 1.6, tibia 3.7, metatarsus 3.6, tarsus 1.4, total 14.3; II: 4.5, 1.7, 4.3, 4.0, 1.6, 16.1; III: 3.9, 1.5, 3.2, 3.4, 1.0, 13.0; IV: 3.8, 1.3, 3.2, 3.8, 1.5, 13.6. Spination: femur I–III: p1-1-1; d0-1-1; r1-1-1; femur IV: p1-1-1; d0-1-1; r0-0-1; tibia I–II: p1-0-0; r1-0-0;

v2-2-2-0; tibia III–IV: p1-0-1; r1-0-1; v2-2-0; metatarsus I–II: p1-0-0; r1-0-0; v2-2-0; metatarsus III: p1-1-0; r1-1-0; v2-2-0; metatarsus IV: p1-1-2; r1-1-2; v2-2-0. Chelicerae with 3 anterior and 4 posterior teeth, and with ca. 20 denticles in a row ( Fig. 43 View Figures 34-45 ).

Copulatory organ as in diagnosis. Epigynal field rounded, without anterior bands; slit sense organs separated by about one of their lengths from epigynal field. Internal duct system with reticulate pattern in large oval parts ( Fig. 49 View Figures 46-49 ), apparently representing narrow ducts.

Colouration. Prosoma, chelicerae, legs and pedipalps brownish-orange. Sternum pale orange with darker margins. Gnathocoxae pale orange, labium pale orange with brown base. Opisthosoma cream coloured with faint brown pattern of transverse chevrons.

Variation. Total length: 6.3-6.7. Prosoma length: 3.1-3.3.

Distribution. Guyana.

Mello-Leitao CF de (1940) Spiders of the Guiana forest collected by O. W. Richards. Arquivos de Zoologia do Estatdo de Sao Paulo 2: 175 - 197.

Platnick NI (2009) The world spider catalog, version 9.5. American Museum of Natural History, New York. http: // research. amnh. org / entomology / spiders / catalog / (accessed: 15. I. 2009)

Roewer CF (1954) Katalog der Araneen von 1758 bis 1940, bzw. 1954. Bruxelles 2: 1 - 1751.

Gallery Image

Figures 34-45. Sparianthina rufescens (Mello-Leitão, 1940) comb. n. from Guyana (34-39 ♁ NHM 1930.4.15.48 40 ♀ holotype 41-45 ♀ NHM 1930.4.15.45). 34-37 Left ♁ palp (34 prolateral 35 ventral 36-37 retrolateral) 38, 43 Chelicerae, ventral 39, 44 Eyes, dorsal 40-41 Epigyne, ventral 42 Internal duct system, dorsal. 45 Labium and left gnathocoxa, ventral.

Gallery Image

Figures 46-49. Sparianthina rufescens (Mello-Leitão, 1940) comb. n. from Guyana (♀ NHRS, PJ 1878). 46-47 Epigyne (46 ventral 47 posterior) 48-49 Internal duct system (48 dorsal 49 detail of right half). EF – epigynal furrow (explanation see diagnosis for Sparianthina).

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

NHRS

Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Collections

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Sparassidae

Genus

Sparianthina